Back in the 1960s, London Zoo had an oxpecker exhibit exactly as "Chlidonias" described above.I have seen an old photo, either in one of the IZYs or one of Hediger's books - I can't remember exactly where - of an oxpecker exhibit in a European zoo where they had a hide stretched over an arched frame as a substitute for an ungulate.
Yes the oxpeckers perched on the hide as, in the wild, they would have perched on ungulates.Hi @Tim May
Did you ever see them 'using' the hide as it was intended?
Oregon Zoo had them in the recent past, not sure about other North American zoos. There's none around in North American zoos now.
It’s an interesting idea, I wonder how realistic it would be to have a set up similar to the Hippo aviary at Beauval or the Okapi at Rotterdam, but with a more appropriate species. Would whichever species that may be, still be likely to host ticks or mites in a captive setting though?Curious if oxpeckers are kept in captivity or ever have been. They have such an interesting symbiotic (or possible parasitic) relationship with so many iconic species it seems an interesting display could be made.
Oxpeckers don't just eat parasitic invertebrates, they are also parasitic themselves - they open wounds on animals and keep them open to feed upon the blood. You wouldn't want to be keeping them with ungulates in zoos.It’s an interesting idea, I wonder how realistic it would be to have a set up similar to the Hippo aviary at Beauval or the Okapi at Rotterdam, but with a more appropriate species. Would whichever species that may be, still be likely to host ticks or mites in a captive setting though?
Oxpeckers don't just eat parasitic invertebrates, they are also parasitic themselves - they open wounds on animals and keep them open to feed upon the blood. You wouldn't want to be keeping them with ungulates in zoos.
It's possible they did - I'm just saying it's a bad idea. Also note that direct blood-feeding in oxpeckers is a relatively new discovery (I think), so it probably would also depend on when that zoo did so.I seem to remember hearing one zoo kept them with ungulates in an indoor exhibit?
Zurich Zoo definitely kept red-billed oxpeckers with black rhinos. A paper on the subject was published in "Zoo Biology" (September 2004); the paper is available on line but I couldn't copy the link.I seem to remember hearing one zoo kept them with ungulates in an indoor exhibit?
Edit: This appears to be Zurich, with rhinos? Do they still have this setup?
Here: https://www.researchgate.net/public...illed_oxpeckers_and_black_rhinos_in_captivityZurich Zoo definitely kept red-billed oxpeckers with black rhinos. A paper on the subject was published in "Zoo Biology" (September 2004); the paper is available on line but I couldn't copy the link.
I did not know that, definitely sounds like a bad idea in that case!Oxpeckers don't just eat parasitic invertebrates, they are also parasitic themselves - they open wounds on animals and keep them open to feed upon the blood. You wouldn't want to be keeping them with ungulates in zoos.