This is what I expected you to say mate, this is front page news here in Queensland today.
I'm not disputing that, the proposal has been around for a while.
If they do want them then good on them, So you think the Gold coast might be to warm for them, well the San Diego zoo is a warm place and they seem to be going fine over there and breeding too SO what is your problem?
I'm glad you think I'm so predictable Mark. It's a pity though that you have no idea about me or what my thoughts are.
My concerns are many. For a start, last year, Currumbin Sanctuary was on the verge of closing, as it's finances were reportedly incredibly low, and visitation was also very low. I'm wondering just how they are going to afford to build appropriate facilities for pandas, pay for the importation, and outlay appropriate salaries for some decent researchers? Maybe they made enough from their last sale of koalas, or perhaps there's another sale on the horizon?
Most of the major zoos in the world these days frown upon giant pandas being moved from China to overseas institutions. Almost always (with a few notable exceptions), this is a fund-raising exercise. Granted, it's also an awareness-raising exercise, but as for research? I'm curious about what research on giant pandas Currumbin Sanctuary can offer, that can't be done in the species range country, and that hasn't already been done by San Diego et al? Most zoos would prefer to see research done in the range country, and instead of bringing pandas into a less than ideal situation, opt for sending conservation funds, research staff, and other resources to the range state.
Past experience at Melbourne, Taronga and Auckland Zoos has shown that for short-term loans of pandas, visitation skyrockets during the period the animals are there, and then falls well below average for a period after the visit. Having worked at Melbourne Zoo through the period of the panda visit there, I'm speaking with first-hand knowledge of this. I suspect that if Currumbin is successful in obtaining permits to import the species, their attendance will also jump dramatically, but overall, I doubt that they'll make a fortune out of the animals, especially when you also include the cost of providing suitable facilities and employing additional staff.
OH and Zoopro last I heard they announced here in Queensland Koalas were an Endangered species.
The IUCN 2006 Red List:
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Phascolarctos cinereus
lists koalas as Lower Risk: "
A taxon is Lower Risk when it has been evaluated, does not satisfy the criteria for any of the categories Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable."
and the Australian Government National Koala Conservation Strategy:
National Koala Conservation Strategy
states: "
While it is still relatively abundant and widespread on a national basis and does not meet national criteria for listing as endangered or vulnerable at this time..." and "
In Queensland, they occur throughout most of their range and there are regions where the population is stable, although the overall koala population is probably declining due to continued clearing and fragmentation of woodland and forest."
Your main concerns from your previous posts however, appear to be that whatever species Queensland zoos can get, so they are handy for you to go and see, is a good thing. In my opinion that is a little narrow-minded.
SO what is your problem? or are you just a BORN nit picker?.
Of course you are entitled to your opinion, but I'm afraid that this comment doesn't warrant much of an answer from me. If your take on my contributions to this forum is that I'm a born nit picker, I'm comfortable with that. We can't all agree with each other all the time.