Of course, following the thread with huge interest. Up until no.6, nothing too controversial. Hard to make a list like this, as there are so many possible factors to weigh.
I saw the Sichuan house in 2005, as one of the first zoo’s I’ve ever visited. As I was more mammal orientated at the time, I was slightly disappointed. I have only realised the uniqueness of the building since, and I bet it would be on many people’s list.
The desert house in Nurnberg was obvious, I didn’t know ROTRA was an improved version of the lauded Apenheul exhibit, but apparantly it is. In which case, logical inclusion.
I have to say, seeing Zurichs bear exhibit in winter was a slightly underwhelming experience. I have to give that another shot in more favourable conditions.
The gorillarium irks me. If inclusion on this list is based on “exhibitry”, then that would be the best possible trade-off between animal wellfare and visitor experience and I’m not convinced about the latter. And the fact the gorilla’s thrived isn’t enough for me. There are too many examples where animals thrived in seemingly poor conditions.
In that respect, I would much rather include Ouwehands Gorilla exhibit because that exhibit really got me thinking. At first sight, I didn’t like it at all, but the more I thought about it, the more I realised I didn’t know why… till the point my opinion tilted. I love the “marmite effect” that exhibit has
No critique though! Love reading about and love discussing zoos, especially subjective things like “best…”.
I need to make a list and see how many match your list. I had a quick go but got stuck on about 20 exhibits sofar
Honorable posthumous note on Emmens’ penguin exhibit
I saw the Sichuan house in 2005, as one of the first zoo’s I’ve ever visited. As I was more mammal orientated at the time, I was slightly disappointed. I have only realised the uniqueness of the building since, and I bet it would be on many people’s list.
The desert house in Nurnberg was obvious, I didn’t know ROTRA was an improved version of the lauded Apenheul exhibit, but apparantly it is. In which case, logical inclusion.
I have to say, seeing Zurichs bear exhibit in winter was a slightly underwhelming experience. I have to give that another shot in more favourable conditions.
The gorillarium irks me. If inclusion on this list is based on “exhibitry”, then that would be the best possible trade-off between animal wellfare and visitor experience and I’m not convinced about the latter. And the fact the gorilla’s thrived isn’t enough for me. There are too many examples where animals thrived in seemingly poor conditions.
In that respect, I would much rather include Ouwehands Gorilla exhibit because that exhibit really got me thinking. At first sight, I didn’t like it at all, but the more I thought about it, the more I realised I didn’t know why… till the point my opinion tilted. I love the “marmite effect” that exhibit has
No critique though! Love reading about and love discussing zoos, especially subjective things like “best…”.
I need to make a list and see how many match your list. I had a quick go but got stuck on about 20 exhibits sofar
Honorable posthumous note on Emmens’ penguin exhibit