What coronavirus restrictions would mean the railway would have to close?it's a sad day and time for everyone as the railway has been at Paignton for many years now and it's a firm favourite with all the visitors but due to Coronavirus Restrictions the railway had to be closed
What coronavirus restrictions would mean the railway would have to close?
Social distancing hasn’t been law since July.One would imagine that having dozens of people cram into miniature trains isn't the most "socially distant" situation![]()
Social distancing hasn’t been law since July.
I’m not interested in your views about Covid. I simply asked which restrictions meant the train had to be closed down, which was stated by Jedd. There aren’t any.Firstly, upkeep and maintenance costs money even when something like that isn't running; the long period of closures and being legally unable to run it will have taken its toll.
Secondly, and more importantly, there's a difference between only doing the responsible and sensible thing because it's legally mandated, and continuing to do so when it is merely advised because it IS the responsible thing to do. See, for instance, zoos continuing to request visitors wear face coverings indoors even after this ceased to be law.... or for that matter, the fact I am continuing to wear a mask in public now. As such, it's reasonable to imagine Paignton kept measures in place because making the train safe for use was infeasible given the current situation.
People thinking that they should only take precautions when legally forced to are part of the reason we're still deep in the mire now, sadly.
Well said.A further reason given for closure was that the train was not accessible to people with disabilities. This matters.
I’m really not interested in your views about Covid. I simply asked which rules meant the train had to be closed down, which was stated by Jedd. There aren’t any and I’m sceptical that was the reason this decision was taken.
Thankfully for you I’ve not stated any opinion on any precautions Paignton has taken, whereas you have gone to great length to make your position clear, despite being unprompted.Jedd said COVID restrictions were a factor, but said nothing about these restrictions solely being the legally mandated ones - Paignton chose (as many collections have) to continue precautions after the long lockdown ended, and as such kept the railway closed after the legal requirement for social distancing ended. To claim there were no rules and restrictions in place which would have impacted the railway (on top of the pressing factor cited by @gentle lemur ) is demonstrably false.
But then, to echo your own words, I'm really not interested in whether you believe they were justified in having taken these precautions![]()
That's an awfully long walk for kids who want to see an animal if they go that way round the zoo, unless they build at least one new exhibit within the Brookside footprint.Brookside update: See below. My personal opinion is that, like Edinburgh, replacing animal exhibits with botanical areas is fine, as long as the balance between zoological & botanical collections are kept in balance (namely animal not plant since it’s predominantly a zoo one is paying to visit).
Tree Works On Site • Paignton Zoo
Is there a ‘hold’ on RR Hog breeding? It would be great to see a larger group at PZ.Doesn't PZ only hold female RR hogs?
I doubt the current pair of cheetahs are ever likely to breed, or they wouldn't have been mixed in the first place.
They used to have a larger group- around six- stemming from when the previous pair bred. Gradually they have died off again. I suspect they don't aim to breed anymore?Is there a ‘hold’ on RR Hog breeding? It would be great to see a larger group at PZ.