Ron Johnson, Tammy Baldwin introduce bill to remove federal protections for the gray wolf

Pantheraman

Well-Known Member
"Wisconsin's two U.S. senators joined forces this week to introduce a bill to remove federal protections for the gray wolf.

Republican Ron Johnson and Democrat Tammy Baldwin are seeking to return management of gray wolf populations to the states.

They're also seeking to delist the gray wolf as an endangered species in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan and Wyoming under the federal Endangered Species Act.

Wyoming's two Republican U.S. senators, Cynthia Lummis and John Barrasso, have joined the effort that comes after a key court ruling."

"Last month, a California federal court judge ordered that federal protections be restored for gray wolves in most of the U.S., including Wisconsin.

The ruling effectively banned any hunting or trapping seasons as well as prohibited lethal control of wolves around ranches or farms. Only nonlethal means can be used to deter wolves."

"In a statement, Johnson said: “Wisconsinites must have a say in the management of gray wolves. In the western Great Lakes region, state wildlife agencies should manage the recovered population so the wolf’s ongoing role in the ecosystem does not come at the expense of farmers, loggers, sportsmen and people who simply live in these areas."


Johnson, Baldwin push bill to remove federal protections for gray wolf

My response: Well of course they would try to remove them from the endangered list. I believe wolves to them represent something they can use to get the people fighting so they can run off with all the money. That and politicians serve themselves by serving special interests.

In a statement, Baldwin said: “I have supported a bipartisan effort to delist the gray wolf in Wisconsin since 2011 because of the scientific conclusion that the population has recovered in the Great Lakes region and that is why we should return management to the State of Wisconsin. This bipartisan legislation is the best solution because it is driven by science and is focused on delisting in the Great Lakes region, including Wisconsin.”
 
I note how you can always tell what angle someone is speaking from in the wolf protections debate by whether they refer to wolf populations as 'recovering' or 'recovered'.

How do present US wolf numbers compare to those at different stages since European colonisation, does anyone know?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVM
I note how you can always tell what angle someone is speaking from in the wolf protections debate by whether they refer to wolf populations as 'recovering' or 'recovered'.

How do present US wolf numbers compare to those at different stages since European colonisation, does anyone know?
In areas where wolves have returned, it’s hard to know their original numbers, so we don’t really know. In Wisconsin specifically at least, numbers actually likely are higher than historically thanks to the overpopulated numbers of deer providing a more reliable food source.

Of course, the vast majority of the US has yet to see their wolves return…
 
"Wisconsin's two U.S. senators joined forces this week to introduce a bill to remove federal protections for the gray wolf.

Republican Ron Johnson and Democrat Tammy Baldwin are seeking to return management of gray wolf populations to the states.

They're also seeking to delist the gray wolf as an endangered species in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan and Wyoming under the federal Endangered Species Act.

Wyoming's two Republican U.S. senators, Cynthia Lummis and John Barrasso, have joined the effort that comes after a key court ruling."

"Last month, a California federal court judge ordered that federal protections be restored for gray wolves in most of the U.S., including Wisconsin.

The ruling effectively banned any hunting or trapping seasons as well as prohibited lethal control of wolves around ranches or farms. Only nonlethal means can be used to deter wolves."

"In a statement, Johnson said: “Wisconsinites must have a say in the management of gray wolves. In the western Great Lakes region, state wildlife agencies should manage the recovered population so the wolf’s ongoing role in the ecosystem does not come at the expense of farmers, loggers, sportsmen and people who simply live in these areas."


Johnson, Baldwin push bill to remove federal protections for gray wolf

My response: Well of course they would try to remove them from the endangered list. I believe wolves to them represent something they can use to get the people fighting so they can run off with all the money. That and politicians serve themselves by serving special interests.

In a statement, Baldwin said: “I have supported a bipartisan effort to delist the gray wolf in Wisconsin since 2011 because of the scientific conclusion that the population has recovered in the Great Lakes region and that is why we should return management to the State of Wisconsin. This bipartisan legislation is the best solution because it is driven by science and is focused on delisting in the Great Lakes region, including Wisconsin.”

I cannot help but to wonder, had former Lieutenant Governor Mandela Barnes beat Ron Johnson in the 2022 United States Senate election in Wisconsin, would a Senator Barnes have supported such a policy?
 
I cannot help but to wonder, had former Lieutenant Governor Mandela Barnes beat Ron Johnson in the 2022 United States Senate election in Wisconsin, would a Senator Barnes have supported such a policy?
Wisconsin residents are split nearly 50/50 for either "let wolves stay" or "eradicate all wolves".
 
I cannot help but to wonder, had former Lieutenant Governor Mandela Barnes beat Ron Johnson in the 2022 United States Senate election in Wisconsin, would a Senator Barnes have supported such a policy?

I also wonder what position former United States Senator from Wisconsin, Russ Feingold would have taken on this specific issue. I know that biodiversity conservation was an important issue for Senator Feingold. Pardon the digression, but he was one of my favorite United States senators and I miss him a lot. I sure as hell liked him a lot better than his successor, Ron Johnson.

On a side note, here is what Russ Feingold had to say about biodiversity, climate change, and the courts;

"Historically, the United States has been the world's biggest carbon emitter. That legacy puts a certain onus on the U.S. to be the world leader in addressing the climate crisis. In order to do that, our elected representatives need to make climate a priority.

Russ Feingold became a household name co-authoring the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, more commonly known as McCain-Feingold. There was a time when climate wasn’t a partisan issue. Feingold reminisces about long-gone bipartisanship: “On so many issues a lot of the Democrats and Republicans were willing to work together and that's how Gaylord Nelson was able to pass as a senator the Clean Water Act… Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency. It’s not like he was an anti-environmentalist, but things sharply changed, at some point in the late 2000s. And I think we both know what it was. It was a direct attempt to take climate out of the sphere of bipartisanship and to turn it into a partisan bloodbath led by some very powerful corporate interests.”

Russ Feingold on Biodiversity, Climate and The Courts

Here is another relevant article written by Russ Feingold.

What US Leadership Can Do for Nature

Although the United States is not a party to the Convention on Biological Diversity, its heavyweight status affords it ample opportunities to contribute to global conservation efforts. One major test will be this month’s COP15 conference, which may be the world’s last best chance to reverse biodiversity loss.

What US Leadership Can Do for Nature | by Russ Feingold - Project Syndicate
 
Last edited:
Back
Top