@Al: There you go (I hope it's not too lengthy):
My overall impression of Himalaya was still more positive than I had expected (and my expectations actually were quite high). In my eyes, the already really charming area has been significantly upgraded. The following impressions contributed to this:
1) A comparatively unobtrusive but at the same time convincing landscape design
Actually, the initially planned design elements have been significantly reduced. This way, the landscaping is kept rather unobtrusive but extremely convincing with a strong focus on plantings and natural stone. There is relatively little artificial rock (except for some large climbing rocks for children you hardly notice much of it). Most of the shelters, bridges and benches, but also fences, are reduced to natural or near-natural materials such as wood and rope with relatively little metal, fabric or paint/colour. All in all, this creates a really convincing, natural look. And where artistic elements such as colourful flags or animal or landscape drawings do appear, I find them unobtrusive and pleasing. The didactics as well as play and movement elements for children (balancing paths, climbing rocks, a swing) have also been integrated quite successfully into the overall picture.
2) Optimised animal facilities with varied immersion effects
Even though many of the exhibits convinced me in the past, they have been noticeably upgraded with a lot of rock and plants. In addition, you feel much closer to the animals but also to the enclosures through various platforms (similar to the bison one at the main entrance), rustic wooden shelters (similar to the ones at Brehm house and monkey house but less exotic), rock or stone wall "windows" with or without glass and, in the case of the panda-deer-exhibit, even a bridge leading into the enclosure. (Almost) Everywhere you feel like you are in the middle of everything and the enclosures not only seem closer, but somehow also much bigger. I really wondered whether the snow leopard enclosure has been enlarged. But like the vulture aviary at the Brehm House, it could simply have something to do with the perspective.
3) Attractive, varied and well-placed species selection
The division of "Takin valley", "summit" and the wide plateau behind it is also coherently conveyed by the animal population.
- The opening is quite impressive with the large, colourful gate and the tall bamboo. The monkeys didn't act like they fully arrived yet (if they don't always sit around so calm), but that's not too bad. Along the same lines, the large bird aviary is not particularly lively either, despite the mixed species. But I think it's quite ok for opening the area and it is still better variety than with only two different birds of prey like before. Of course, I missed the promised pikas and bobaks a bit (unfortunately I didn't see the squirrels, but they could make up for it, even if you can only watch them through narrow slits).
- In Takin Valley, I found the "doubling" with two Takines surprisingly not too much at all. Rather, it seemed concentrated, as if you were in the middle of a large herd. The additional kept a bit in the background, but still enriched the overall picture. In addition, you have the combination of crested deer and lesser panda. During my visit, the latter were unfortunately in a box at the back (3-4 animals close together, tussling a bit - observed by staff). But the small deer also enliven the enclosure - although you do have to look for them a bit first. In tune with the rather quiet impressions, there is the upgraded central area with lots of seating opportunities (stone benches, a large wooden wagon, wooden benches with and without canopies...). Perfect for an early, relaxed break on the ascent - at which you can easily forget about time, though.
- The summit is really a highlight with the snow leopards clearly standing out for me. It seems a bit as if they have finally found their actual place after their time at Brehm House: They climb over the rocks and cliffs, stalk around and suddenly pop up with their head in front of or above you, stand up at the full-size glass window and lightly tap the glass, elegantly roam the rock and plant zones, rest on rock niches and observe the area from the height or drink from the small pond. They also appear quite suddenly at the small viewing window - or they even climb onto inner the half of the wooden shelter, so that you can watch them through the cracks in the wood - and vice versa. Especially when I was alone for a longer time and the big, elegant cats didn't stop moving playfully through the whole enclosure, it was like being in an intense dream without any sense of time and space. Even if it sounds mean, the hoofed animals were something of an accessory in this section of Himalaya. But they are also very attractive in their own right and enrich the overall impression enormously (especially since they are also climbing around on the slope, while you make your way up the hill). For me, the Manul complex on top is now more than ever like an ironic but good joke: When you have finally made the climb, arrived at the very top and are only starting to enjoy the wide view, you just about notice there is this small round and rather barren "aviary" - and with a bit of luck in the middle of it a small compact fur ball with an intense, not quite classifiable look. For me it's just prizeless. It always puts a smile on my face - and in a strange but certainly not bad way it makes me self-aware.
-The extensive circular plateau path around the summit (you could already see it from above) is a long but rewarding road. Not only do you see the tall deer as close as never before (unfortunately through the bars, but this way they come very close as a large group - just as many of pairs of eyes already looked at me intensely from afar and then continued to follow me step by step as I came to the enclosure. Then I was completely overwhelmed, in a positive sense, by the kiangs in their wide, spacious enclosure. They too - always travelling in a large troop of around 10 animals - watched and approached me quite curiously, then briefly retreated, and then return coming even closer and in fact as close as possible. After a short moment, they retreated again and they are very small and far away. Then all of a sudden, they follow an unfathomable impulse - and they gallop across the grounds with powerful kicks. When you experience these impressions, you seriously ask yourself how the park ever got the idea to put (pardon) often somewhat boring moose onto these grounds. Yes, I did love the moose too - but now it feels like the whole complex has been revived living up to its full purpose and potential. Here, at the farthest, remotest tip of the huge Tierpark grounds, you come to realise again what this park actually is all about and what makes it so special and unique. Just like counterpart to the calm yet imposing bison at the main entrance, the kiangs demonstrate that ungulates can be extremely fascinating. As far away from the entrance as possible (and very much unwilling to head there any earlier than necessary if at all), I found myself checking the time and calculating when I'd have to go eventually, if I wanted to leave the park in time for 6:30 p.m. (and of course I overdid it slightly and had to use the revolving gate).
- I did not mention the bird aviaries so far (and they put more birds up here than announced). There are some very attractive birds here, both in terms of colour and pattern, and some nice mixed species exhibits. I am particularly fond of the red-billed kittas. Such beautiful birds and also so lively and loud.
4) Few weak points that don't make much of a difference
In fact, I have hardly anything to complain about and still almost feel shabby for it after this great experience. Except for the somewhat small and barren manul area (but the barrenness certainly fits in somewhere with the simulated vegetation zone), the strengths are actually also the weaknesses of the adventure zone. With the snow leopards as the highlight, it can get jammed there quite quickly. There is only one wide main view and a one one-person-only side view. This means you could be carried or "chased" away by the people - or you need the appropriate patience (or simply wait for a day with rather bad weather). My biggest criticism is actually more of a compliment: somehow the 60,000 square metres are still not enough for me. I would like to see so many more animals and facilities - especially looking at the vast empty space behind the Kiangs. Also, it is regrettable, at least for visitors who aren't strong walkers, that the railway apparently does not go up the hill, contrary to earlier plans (I heard the electric motor or the battery is too weak). Personally, I don't miss it up there at all. But with small or old legs it can be exhausting. Then again, I noticed some very fit pensioners with and without tracksuits and walking sticks, who obviously use this section as part of their fitness routine.
Overall conclusion:
What can I say? You've probably already noticed anyway: I'm completely blown away. It was the best visit to the Tierpark I've had in a long time (and I enjoy virtually every visit there). After being quite impressed with previous projects such as Monkey House and Brehm House, it immediately became my new favourite area, at least for the time being. Thinking about future visits, I can really imagine that I may sometimes more or less leave the whole big park to itself and parrot the Tierpark's most recent PR in my head: The mountain is calling...