Bengal Tiger
Well-Known Member
My sister's babysitter and her babysitter's grandpa have gotten into an argument about whether sharks are fish. I didn't feel comfortable putting my point of view without some help from you all.
Some people still like an old fashioned 'argument' or heated discussion. My first office job where computers and the internet were available, was with a few young ladies who would refuse to look for the answers online to subjects they couldn't agree on.Don't know why your babysitter and her grandpa (or even yourself) couldn't have just searched that up because it's rather clear that they are fish when you search it up.![]()
Sharks are by definition cartilaginous fish and are a part of the class Chondrichthyes. I've learned from a young age that sharks are fish and I'm actually rather certain most of the general public is aware of this.
Don't know why your babysitter and her grandpa (or even yourself) couldn't have just searched that up because it's rather clear that they are fish when you search it up.![]()
I knew this already, and I DID look it up, I wanted backup, so that the situation would not be "some random 13 year old said yes..."Uh, yes, they are... They're called cartilaginous fish after all... Why couldn't you just look it up, why do you need our input?
She actually does not babysit me, she used to. Now I just do my own thing.So, your babysitter?![]()
Some people still like an old fashioned 'argument' or heated discussion.
I knew this already, and I DID look it up, I wanted backup, so that the situation would not be "some random 13 year old said yes..."
She actually does not babysit me, she used to. Now I just do my own thing.
I think after this is done we can talk about @Dassie rat's questionWell if someone wanted that, we could pivot this thread to answering the "are birds reptiles" questionin my experience that usually starts a heated discussion!
As @littleRedPanda said, some people like to start a bit of a debate, though the intention was not to talk about my reasons for starting this thread.How is random people on a message board better backup than websites for shark organizations, national geographic, NOAA, major aquariums, and hundreds of other reputable places?
As @littleRedPanda said, some people like to start a bit of a debate, though the intention was not to talk about my reasons for starting this thread.
He is doctor, and claims they aren't "true fish" saying that bony fish are "true fish" while cartilaginous fish are not.Yes. Sharks are fish. If it resembles a fish and has gills, it's a fish.
Why exactly is one person arguing they aren't fish?
I suppose that is out of my controlWell you started a debate all right, mostly about how old you are.![]()
If it resembles a fish and has gills, it's a fish.
He is doctor, and claims they aren't "true fish" saying that bony fish are "true fish" while cartilaginous fish are not.
I suppose that is out of my control![]()
As @littleRedPanda said, some people like to start a bit of a debate, though the intention was not to talk about my reasons for starting this thread.
I thought you were asking WHY I started the thread.What does that have to do with what I said?
In term of clades, yes. In term of Reptilia class and Aves class, no. If this did start a heated discussion, blame Carl Linnaeus.Well if someone wanted that, we could pivot this thread to answering the "are birds reptiles" questionin my experience that usually starts a heated discussion!
Of course they aren't fish. They are under Sirenia!Rebuttal A: Greater Siren
![]()