Corangurilla
Well-Known Member
Both are equally bad, I’d say.I would be more worried about the giraffes breaking their legs on the Meerkat burrows.
Both are equally bad, I’d say.I would be more worried about the giraffes breaking their legs on the Meerkat burrows.
No clue if this thread is dead or not, but while I cannot identify the zoo in question (due to the film’s age and it being focused on comedy), the final sequence in this comedy short from the 40s shows footage of three different types of bear in the same enclosure (Asiatic Black, Sloth and Sun, all given cartoon mouths), which raises an eyebrow (it appears several zoos have done such combos). Skip to 6:23 if you wish to see the bears. A warning though, the narrator uses some cringeworthy language to describe the bears.
It would be helpful if someone could identify the zoo that was used for this sequence.
Are walkthrough exhibits technically mixed-species, with visiting humans being one of the species that is temporarily there?
Toronto has a successful mix of Marabou storks, white-headed vultures and giant elands so there's an example of a successful mixing of hoofstock and cranes/storksIt is common, Marabous are also regularly seen mixed with hoofstock. Cranes in particular have the reputation of being aggressive, but they're no match for most hoofstock they get mixed with. If either party gets hurt it's almost always the birds. The AZA does now recommend not mixing cranes, storks, and vultures with large hoofstock, but many facilities still do with varying levels of success.
Do they breedToronto has a successful mix of Marabou storks, white-headed vultures and giant elands so there's an example of a successful mixing of hoofstock and cranes/storks
None of them breed except for a couple hornbills in the kudu exhibit. The elands are all males and the marabou storks are quite old, as well the white+headed vulture is the only one of its species in Canada, maybe even North America but I’m not 100% sure.Do they breed
Zebra, ostriches, and giraffes are a pretty standard mix. I can't imagine a pygmy hippo causing too much trouble on top of that mix.Montgomery Zoo has a mixed savanna with pigmy hippo, grants zebra, ostrich, and maybe giraffe (I can't confirm the last animal).
It just… doesn’t fit. You’ve got three standard savanna animals, and then a rainforest species? It feels wrong.Zebra, ostriches, and giraffes are a pretty standard mix. I can't imagine a pygmy hippo causing too much trouble on top of that mix.
How is this one of the worst mixed-species combinations?
Well, worst is wildly subjective. IMO it is terrible due to it being so strange. It just is odd, the other animals are all general savanna species and then you have this one off rainforest creature that just doesn't fit at all.Zebra, ostriches, and giraffes are a pretty standard mix. I can't imagine a pygmy hippo causing too much trouble on top of that mix.
How is this one of the worst mixed-species combinations?
I really am not sure. I can only think that the reason is space, they breed them a lot and have been looking for places to put them from what I have been told.It just… doesn’t fit. You’ve got three standard savanna animals, and then a rainforest species? It feels wrong.
@SwampDonkey Do the zebras and hippos interact much? Out of the three “normal” animals, I think they’d be the most problematic around the hippos.
(Also Montgomery has like 2 other Pygmy hippo exhibits, so why mix them here?)
Well, worst is wildly subjective. IMO it is terrible due to it being so strange. It just is odd, the other animals are all general savanna species and then you have this one off rainforest creature that just doesn't fit at all.
I really am not sure. I can only think that the reason is space, they breed them a lot and have been looking for places to put them from what I have been told.
It just… doesn’t fit. You’ve got three standard savanna animals, and then a rainforest species? It feels wrong.
I can’t think of any examples of that off the top of my head (or even any places that keep Gemsbok, for that matter).Really not a problem - Gemsbok are put in savanna exhibits on a regular basis, but they're desert dwellers.
I agree, that seems more off. That being said, I've seen scimitar oryx in savanna exhibits and they aren't in the same environment with giraffes or zebras. Those mixings are a bit odd as are bongos in mixed exhibits.I can’t think of any examples of that off the top of my head (or even any places that keep Gemsbok, for that matter).
I think that one’s more excusable since Gemsbok do live alongside zebras, giraffes, and the like in the Kalahari. Meanwhile, Pygmy Hippos and Zebras don’t even live on the same side of Africa.
As I understand Egyptian geese are pretty aggressive.Though IIRC, this had been changed the last time I visited, for a long time the Saint Louis Zoo had red river hogs sharing an exhibit with bat-eared foxes, and while I never saw any actual conflict between the species, you hardly ever caught so much as a glimpse of the foxes due to them spending almost all the time behind the scenes, and I suspect that this was because the larger more boisterous red river hogs made them nervous. Also, Egyptian geese were added to the mix for a time, and while again I never saw any conflict myself, based on the fact the geese were removed from that exhibit within like a year, I think it probably ended badly.
I think that one’s more excusable since Gemsbok do live alongside zebras, giraffes, and the like in the Kalahari. Meanwhile, Pygmy Hippos and Zebras don’t even live on the same side of Africa.
Yeah, that’s fair. So long as the hippo babies are in a different exhibit (and I’m pretty sure they are), then the zebras shouldn’t be a problem.I really don't see the problem here. If the species are compatible and all needs can be met then why not. Now obviously zoogeographically correct exhibits are nice, but zoos have limited space. If a mix works and is acceptable for all species involved, I'm not going to criticize them for it. Especially if it means more holders for species as the AZA increasingly moves to phase out numerous species.