Wildlife World Zoo & Aquarium SwampDonkey's Wildlife World trip reports

SwampDonkey

In the Swamp
Premium Member
5+ year member
I had been looking forward to visiting Wildlife World (henceforth shortened to WW) since I was a child in the 1990s and I read about it in a book. I finally made it and I think it was good that it took so long. Broadly the zoo is a study in contrasts.

Remembering that this is a private zoo goes a long way. It is not AZA accredited, but it is ZAA accredited and hosting their conference next month. They have a fair amount of "extra" items you can buy or do, including several amusement park type rides, a train, tram, feeding (giraffe, sealion, stingray, koi, ducks, petting zoo), etc.

It seems that the new areas are really nice, and broadly the collection of animals is staggering. We were there at about 9:30AM and stayed until about 4:30, without lingering anywhere, and we were still unable to see the entire place. The staggering number of animals and species makes it hard to really see everything and note what is where, as can be evidenced by my photo title edits.

Zoo wide the hoofstock yards are very large, have cover or grass, and one cannot really ask for much more. The reeves muntjac yard was massive, I am not sure how one ever sees them in it. Primates and carnivores are varied from OK to nice. The new aviaries such as the king vulture, condor, and main aviary are great, some of the older parrot and macaw cages are lacking size and activities. Reptile husbandry is adequate, although some of the small tortoise habitats were too small as were some of the crocodile enclosures. Signage is decent, on par with most AZA facilities.

This post has 10 photos to give you an idea, but I uploaded a bunch to the gallery.

Different areas of the zoo:

Original Zoo: The "Original Zoo" is a work in progress, animals have been moved out and others are getting renovated or new enclosures. Recent new habitats for jaguar and tiger will or have replaced the older and smaller habitats. This section is also where the Tropics of the World (reptile and insect house), Small Mammal House, lorikeet aviary, and Kangaroo Walkabout are located. Most of the reptile and insect enclosures are adequate, similar to other zoos I have been to. Amusingly there were two tanks that were (hopefully) newly occupied and had had written legal pad signs for the type of animal in the enclosure. The Kangaroo Walkabout was pretty cool as they had grey and red kangaroos, not just smaller wallabies as it seems are more common.

The jaguar enclosure seemed new and was on par with AZA habitats I have seen, larger than some like Phoenix zoo. The tiger and lion enclosures are OK, nothing bad or good, just OK. They are building a new tiger enclosure now, so expect them to move there soon. There are two white tigers, one that was with the orange tiger looked good, the other looked really badly inbred as some white tigers seem to. There are two lion enclosures, one here and one in the "Safari Park' this one is OK, but the Safari Park enclosure is easily twice as large and has climbing structure that this one lacked. This enclosure also had a white lioness.

This area also holds the petting zoo, which has habitats for sulcata, water snake, ducks, and other small animals. The water snake habitat was absolutely palatial, almost laughably so.

A separate part of the Original Zoo is the new Dragon World where various monitors and crocodilians are located. I should have made a list but I neglected to do so. Most of the enclosures were a fine size, except for the salt water crocodile - that was much to small for the size of the animal.

Rounding out the "Original Zoo" is the main aviary and a train ride that takes one through several savannah paddocks with African hoofstock and ostrich. These were all really nice, on par with any other savannah yard. The main aviary is a nice medium sized walk through aviary, nothing outstanding but pretty nice.

Train ride in African Train Ride (Old zoo):
full

Kangaroo walkabout:
full

"Bengal" Tigers:
full


Safari Park:
The Safari park is massive, easily the size of most zoos and every bit as nice as most AZA zoos that I have been to. This is one of the newest parts of the zoo, and it shows. All of the habitats are large and well designed. The lion habitat is great, the hyena habitats are nice and the monkey islands (5 of them) are well done with palm trees and climbing structure. Oddly they are all South American monkeys (spider and capuchin) as the African monkeys (vervet, hamadryas, olive, etc.) are all in enclosures other than ring-tailed lemur which have an island. The entire area consists of essentially three loops, they offer a tram ride, but it can all be seen on foot. Interesting is that there is no barrier between the walking path and the island moats, which gave the whole thing a much more immersive feeling:
Spider Monkey Islands:
full

White Rhino:
full

African Lion:
full


Aquarium:
I am not going to spend a lot of time on this. The aquarium is nice, it could stand alone as its own facility. Oddly they chose to have it occupy 5 different buildings, I am sure there is a reason, but it is a bit strange. The shark tank is a good size and all of the other exhibits are nice, the sealion stadium is a fun pirate ship design. African penguins (as are the most common in the ZAA) round out the animals nicely, and their habitat is well done. There is (of course) a stingray touch/feed tank as well.
Amazon tank:
full

Penguins:
full


Adventureland:
Adventureland is South and North American in theme, and they do a better job of keeping it that than they do in the Safari Park. The bear enclosure is OK, too much sun and not enough plantings. As usual the hoofstock yards are all large and include sika, axis, fallow, and mule deer along with bison (including some white bison), tapir, rhea and capybara - plus mountain lion and a host of small animals in the two small animal houses. Of course there are also islands (6!) for spider and capuchin monkey.

Speaking of the rhea and capybara habitat - it is MASSIVE. Honestly, I have no idea why it is so huge, but it is impressive.

The small animal houses were fine, if forgettable. The red footed tortoise cage was too small for the 4 animals in it, but otherwise most of the enclosures were OK. They have a tayra, which is unique to be on display (ironically the second tayra I have seen this month).

Rhea and Capybara:
full

American Black Bear:
full



In conclusion this zoo is amazing, the collection of animals is astounding. I can see where it used to be pretty bad in places, but over the last 10-15 years they have made great strides in their enclosures. There are definitely some habitats that are in dire need of renovation, and there are some animals in cages much too small. The macaws really need more stimulation and larger cages. However, on balance I would chose to go back here before the Phoenix Zoo, which I went to just two days prior to the visit here.
 
Last edited:
You've accidentally used the prefix for Wildwood Wildlife Park instead of Wildlife World. They have annoyingly similar names.
Thanks, I fixed it now :)
That rhea/capybara exhibit is insane, but I really don't like that they are maintaining such a large lawn in Phoenix - people need to be careful with their use of water in the Colorado watershed right now!
I am not sure how much they use, they keep two large water storage ponds on site...but I am sure they still use plenty from the normal supply. It might not normally be that green, it just rained some the day before we went, but it did look like it was irrigated.
 
Thanks for posting a detailed review. Wildlife World Zoo is a place that is extremely divisive, which is why @Tim Brown and I debated about its inclusion in our Top 100 USA book. In the end we included it. The staggering quantity of species there is amazing, and it was neat for us to shine a light on a privately-owned, non-AZA institution. Many of the exhibits are outdated, but the facility has changed so much since my solitary visit (2011) that I'd love to go back again one day. As you point out, some individuals would choose it over nearby Phoenix Zoo and I know that a few years ago Wildlife World regularly had more than 500,000 annual visitors and it is a zoo of considerable size.
 
Thank you so much for doing this review. It is high on my list of facilities I'll be visiting by the end of November (more so than SDZ). Any kind of species list would be appreciated and, at least, knowing if grison are still on display.
 
Aquarium:
I am not going to spend a lot of time on this. The aquarium is nice, it could stand alone as its own facility. Oddly they chose to have it occupy 5 different buildings, I am sure there is a reason, but it is a bit strange. The shark tank is a good size and all of the other exhibits are nice, the sealion stadium is a fun pirate ship design. African penguins (as are the most common in the ZAA) round out the animals nicely, and their habitat is well done. There is (of course) a stingray touch/feed tank as well.
I thought there was 4 aquarium buildings? Anyways, I think they split up the aquarium like that because the original plan for it was this...
wildlife+world+plan.jpg

Manatees? Marlin???? What kind of Zoo Tycoon 2 Marine Mania crap is this?! This is hilarious, they actually thought they could get all of this to work in a desert!
Anyways, good review! Very forgiving for a place like this one. I actually used to prefer Wildlife World to Phoenix back when I hated Phoenix for being "stagnant" (in reality, I was getting fatigue from visiting the same place in the same way every time), but now that Phoenix has acquired Chutti the Indian Rhinoceros and broke ground on Predator Passage, the flaws for Wildlife World have become more noticeable.
There are multiple instances of the same animals in different parts of the zoo (from cape barren geese to white rhinos), the boardwalk is showing its age, and Adventure Land is almost as ridiculous and tacky as Adventure Cove in Columbus (seriously, who puts a rollercoaster in a llama exhibit?!). Still, I owe Wildlife World a lot of "firsts" for the life list:
  • Tayra
  • Grison
  • Saltwater Crocodile
  • Olive Baboon
  • Southern Cassowary
  • Vervet Monkey
  • Wobbegong
  • Black-backed Jackal
  • Sitatunga
  • Wildebeest
  • And many more, I'm sure!
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the Wildlife World Zoo, Aquarium, & Safari Park is pretty fly for a roadside.
 
Last edited:
I actually used to prefer Wildlife World to Phoenix back when I hated Phoenix for being "stagnant" (in reality, I was getting fatigue from visiting the same place in the same way every time), but now that Phoenix has acquired Chutti and broke ground on Predator Passage, the flaws for Wildlife World have become more noticeable.

Who is Chutti?
 
I thought there was 4 aquarium buildings? Anyways, I think they split up the aquarium like that because the original plan for it was this...
wildlife+world+plan.jpg

Manatees? Marlin???? What kind of Zoo Tycoon 2 Marine Mania crap is this?! This is hilarious, they actually thought they could get all of this to work in a desert!

Haha, yeah that master plan is really something. Give them some leeway as often those animal ideas are drawn up from people that have no clue. That said, it is pretty audacious.

There are 5 buildings, but some do "double duty". However, it is not like the restaurant or flume ride take up massive parts of the aquarium buildings, those are still fully separate aquarium buildings.
  • Predators (also Dillon's BBQ restaurant)
  • Diversity of Life (also part of the log flume ride)
  • The Wild & the Wonderful
  • River Monsters
Anyways, good review! Very forgiving for a place like this one. I actually used to prefer Wildlife World to Phoenix back when I hated Phoenix for being "stagnant" (in reality, I was getting fatigue from visiting the same place in the same way every time), but now that Phoenix has acquired Chutti the Indian Rhinoceros and broke ground on Predator Passage, the flaws for Wildlife World have become more noticeable.
Honestly, Phoenix is a very nice zoo, it has some issues, but overall it is a nice (if standard) AZA zoo. But it is also only worth about 5-6 hours of time where WW is easy 7-8 if you really move through it. Predator Passage will be a good improvement and nice addition, that is for sure.
There are multiple instances of the same animals in different parts of the zoo (from cape barren geese to white rhinos), the boardwalk is showing its age, and Adventure Land is almost as ridiculous and tacky as Adventure Cove in Columbus (seriously, who puts a rollercoaster in a llama exhibit?!).
Oh man, Adventure Cove in Columbus is really something. At least it (largely) is separated from the main zoo. Adventure Land is a bit tacky, it does have 4 amusement rides, but it also has WAY more animals than Adventure Cove - but the comparison is apt.

As for the same animals, it is strange, but I would imagine it relates to their sales/breeding programs. There are many islands (19, I think) throughout the zoo, but they are all occupied by spider monkeys (13 islands), capuchin monkey (4 islands) and two island for lemurs.

The monkey repeats were the most glaring, otherwise white rhino, Thomson's gazelle, springbok, dama gazelle, axis deer, king vulture, cape barren geese, Asian small clawed otter, llama, South American tapir, African lions, tiger, crowned crane, Stanley crane, crested screamer, and a number of parrots repeat once (or more for the parrots).

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the Wildlife World Zoo, Aquarium, & Safari Park is pretty fly for a roadside.
I hedge on even calling it roadside at this point. The sheer size of the place, ZAA accreditation (for what that is worth), collection size and species, along with the quality of most of the exhibits puts it in a class of it's own almost. It is not a recently and aspiring AZA zoo like Pittsburg or Columbus, but it far out classes basically every other roadside place. It's also not a drive through safari like Wild Florida (which is similarly private and done really well). The scale of the aquarium alone is large enough to be a normal small/medium stand alone aquarium.
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much for doing this review. It is high on my list of facilities I'll be visiting by the end of November (more so than SDZ).
Thanks! It is hard to compare it to SDZ, which I last went to in 2015. SDZ is in a class at the top of global zoos, probably standing alone for US zoos other than maybe Omaha, Bronx, and maybe Columbus. WW stands as king of the private zoos, and I really enjoyed it. My personal list would have SDZ at the top of public zoos and WW at the top of private zoos. On my combined list I think WW would take the 4th spot after SDZ, Columbus Zoo and NC Zoo (I have not been to Bronx).
Any kind of species list would be appreciated and, at least, knowing if grison are still on display.
I am not much for making complete lists overall, I should try harder in the future for places that don't get many reviews. Generally making these trips with a 5 year old and a wife that is incredibly generous to my love of zoos/aquariums but not nearly as interested as I....limits my time to a degree. I tend to focus more on the "big" view of a place than individual species, unless it is something I really want to see. I am honestly not sure about the grison, we missed the North American animal house and if they were in the "South American Critter" house then I missed them or they were not out.
 
On my list of zoos this month, SDZ is the odd man out compared to what I'm looking for species wise (if I have time I will include it). It's the small mammal collection at WWZ that has me more intrigued than anything at SDZ albeit the two BOParadise species. I also have a soft spot for private facilities considering I spent half my zoological career working at them.
 
A few additional comments:

One major negative with Wildlife World Zoo is the price. An adult ticket is $45.50 plus tax, while for children it is $25.50 plus tax. If my wife and 4 kids went with me it would be around $200 U.S. just to get inside the entrance! Although, it would be a very long day...

When I extensively reviewed this zoo back in 2011, I toured 3 aquarium buildings but the 4th (River Monsters) had not yet opened to the public. I counted approximately 80 exhibits just in those 3 buildings, so with the addition of the 4th building and the new-ish California Sea Lion area, I'm sure that one could spend a couple of hours just touring the aquatic section of the zoo and I wouldn't be surprised if there was close to 100 exhibits. Wow!

My visit took 5 hours then, and with the addition of the extra aquatic exhibits, Dragon World, the Safari Park and Adventureland, I can easily understand why Wildlife World Zoo is one of the biggest zoos in the United States. In terms of quantity of species and time spent at a facility, it's right near the top of North American zoos. However, I found many of the primate and bird exhibits to be mediocre at best and instead of constantly expanding it would have been nice to see the zoo improve the quality of many of the enclosures. Are there still tiny aviaries all over the place? They are relics from when the zoo used to have nothing but birds in its early days before it was even a proper zoo.
 
A few additional comments:

One major negative with Wildlife World Zoo is the price. An adult ticket is $45.50 plus tax, while for children it is $25.50 plus tax. If my wife and 4 kids went with me it would be around $200 U.S. just to get inside the entrance! Although, it would be a very long day...
Yeah, unfortunately zoos keep costing more and more to get into, at least one can say that this place is private. For comparison the Phoenix Zoo is $39 for adults and $29 for kids. I think a lot of us (hopefully) take full advantage of the AZA reciprocal program, so for me (as a ZooTampa member) I can get into the Phoenix Zoo at 50% off, whereas WW is not AZA so there is no discount.

Of note is that WW is nearly always on Groupon which brings the price to $31 for adults and $17 for kids - that is where I bought my tickets ahead of time.
When I extensively reviewed this zoo back in 2011, I toured 3 aquarium buildings but the 4th (River Monsters) had not yet opened to the public. I counted approximately 80 exhibits just in those 3 buildings, so with the addition of the 4th building and the new-ish California Sea Lion area, I'm sure that one could spend a couple of hours just touring the aquatic section of the zoo and I wouldn't be surprised if there was close to 100 exhibits. Wow!

My visit took 5 hours then, and with the addition of the extra aquatic exhibits, Dragon World, the Safari Park and Adventureland, I can easily understand why Wildlife World Zoo is one of the biggest zoos in the United States. In terms of quantity of species and time spent at a facility, it's right near the top of North American zoos.
Yes, and it should be taken account into the price. Admission to a separate zoo and aquarium in the same city would be around $100 for both, usually. While not the size of say, Odysea, it is a considerable aquarium.
However, I found many of the primate and bird exhibits to be mediocre at best and instead of constantly expanding it would have been nice to see the zoo improve the quality of many of the enclosures. Are there still tiny aviaries all over the place? They are relics from when the zoo used to have nothing but birds in its early days before it was even a proper zoo.
I think they are improving them over time. The new or upgraded lemur and colobus cages in the Original Zoo and new primate cages in the Safari Park are adequate and comparable to many AZA zoos, but there are still some primate cages in the Original Zoo that are too small and would not pass muster in an AZA zoo.

There are a LOT of birds around, but the main place they are consolidated is the front part of the Original Zoo and the main aviary (along with large birds in the giant hoofstock paddocks). I will be honest, I pretty much skipped the Original Zoo bird part. Birds are not my main concern to see and we were running short on time when we made it down there as we did all the newer sections first. The main aviary is nice, I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Newish parts to the "Original Zoo" include Dragon World, the jaguar habitat (the old tiny one was unoccupied), a new tiger habitat under construction now (it looks like maybe a couple of months of construction left at most), the king vulture and condor aviaries, and some of the reptile tanks were being worked on when I was there.

Also, I would expect that once the tigers move out to the new habitat they will expand the lions into that space, giving them plenty of room and nearly doubling their current space.
 
Last edited:
Wildlife World Aquarium:

This aquarium is interesting as it spans 5 individual buildings, one outside koi pod, three outside aviaries, three outdoor animal habitats (American flamingo, California sealion and Asiatic small clawed otter), and also is part of the zoo that holds a restaurant and log flume ride. Overall it is a pretty decent aquarium, the tanks are large enough and the animals are varied I would prefer that it had been one larger building, but it is what it is.

The 5 buildings are:
  • Predators (also Dillon's BBQ restaurant)
  • Diversity of Life (also part of the log flume ride)
  • The Wild & the Wonderful
  • River Monsters
Predators:
This building holds a circular tank for lookdown, the large shark tank which has black tip reef, white tip reef, and zebra sharks. It also has a fairly unique eel tank that has a walk through part where eels can be (and were) above your head. Other features were a large stingray touch/feeding tank with southern and cownose rays. Opposite this were a few small tanks along with a larger tank for wobbegon and a white American alligator. The wobbegon we really cool, I have never seen them in person before.

Outside of the restaurant is a habitat for American flamingo and koi fish.

Eels and lookdown tanks:
full


Large shark tank:
full


Large Shark Tank and stingray touch tank
full


Wobbegon:
full

full



Diversity of Life:

This building holds a small coral tank, several tanks for different turtles:
  • Mata mata
  • Common snapping
  • Red eared slider
  • Fly river
Near the turtles are a small touch tank with sea urchin and different starfish. Lastly there is a large tank with different bass and sunfish, and a separate tank with a red tailed hawk and trout. On the outside of this building are also a aviary for a red tailed hawk, a hut with macaw, and two monkey islands with spider monkeys.
full

full



The Wild & the Wonderful

This is one of the larger buildings and has the largest mammals in this part of the zoo - sealions. The other major exhibit here is a fairly sizable African penguin habitat. I found this to be one of the better indoor African penguin habitats I have seen recently. Also found in this building are a variety of salt water tanks holding small fish. Beside the indoor area for the sealions is a circular tank for cownose rays and puffer fish.

The indoor space for the sealions is small, but they seem to have access to the outdoor pool most of the time (or always) as well. The sealion stadium is nice, the pirate ship design was fun and fit the area well. The show lasted about 15-20 minutes and was both educational and fun - the sealions come out of the water and really close. After the show you can pay to feed them or take a picture with one.
full

full

full


River Monsters
This part of the aquarium focuses on Amazon fish, although piranha are absent. Entering the building you encounter a nice habitat for turtles (giant amazon and yellow spot), but the real show is around a small bend where the large Amazon river fish are at. There is another smaller Amazon tank and lastly a salt water tank with various fish and a sea turtle as well as a smaller tank with garden eels. Right outside are two cages with barraband and crimson wing parakeets. Lastly, outside is a large enclosure for Asian small clawed otters.
full

full
 
I visited this facility just a few weeks back and was thoroughly impressed. Not only is the animal collection massive, they have quite a few rarities as well. The exhibitry is basic but, unlike previous reviews, only found a couple to be on the smaller side for its inhabitants. I also understand now about species being repeated but not exactly the species you would expect. I've never seen more King vultures (one of my favorite birds) at one facility ever! Must have been a dozen or so scattered through the park. The restaurant attached was also quite good and very reasonably priced. Anyone planning a visit should also check Groupon which allowed me into the zoo/aquarium for $35, which is very reasonable considering I spent almost 7 hours there just to see everything.
 
I visited this facility just a few weeks back and was thoroughly impressed. Not only is the animal collection massive, they have quite a few rarities as well. The exhibitry is basic but, unlike previous reviews, only found a couple to be on the smaller side for its inhabitants. I also understand now about species being repeated but not exactly the species you would expect. I've never seen more King vultures (one of my favorite birds) at one facility ever! Must have been a dozen or so scattered through the park. The restaurant attached was also quite good and very reasonably priced. Anyone planning a visit should also check Groupon which allowed me into the zoo/aquarium for $35, which is very reasonable considering I spent almost 7 hours there just to see everything.
Thanks for the update! I should also mention that I used the groupon as well, it is definitely the way to go here as there is no AZA discount (since they are not AZA).
 
Back
Top