I don't know, but Semangka tends to be kept inside on the really sunny days, which might be why you don't see her. I too use the Railway entrance, but always go past the Tapirs and Peccaries at the end, and usually see both. I tend to visit in the afternoon too; and I often find Semangka active.
To clarify, I was not meaning I don't often see Semangka being active, I was meaning I almost never see anyone, or any numbers at all down where they are housed. I am sure more would see them (if MZ suddenly about turned and saw some intrest in importing any) if they were placed more prominently, but they will never be a drawcard. People when they see them and particularly when they see them being active are fascinated, but majority even after seeing them would not remember what they are called.
Your ideas are welcomed, and some are very ingenious. We just try to keep things as realistic as possible.
Thank you, I always find your contributions well thought out and useful. My issue on this thread is that when I or others offer a slightly more out of the box idea they are almost immediately jumped upon by certain members shouting them down, saying they don't like that, they much prefer Malayan tapir. I've shrugged it off so far, but it is utterly tiresome and the antithesis of an interesting thread.
Alright. We get it. The poster likes tapir. We understood that 20-50 pages ago in this thread. We haven't forgotten. A thread where only 1 or 2 ideas are allowed to be entertained, and must always immediately be reverted to is not really a thread worth having.
Whilst this is a speculation thread, we don't dream up a Melbourne Zoo with Giant Pandas and Jaguar, when in reality, neither are realistic. Some people reading this thread that aren't familiar with the zoo would think those might be realistic and on the cards. It can be quite misleading, and if we were completely speculative, this thread would be stacked with an array of ideas, that quite frankly would never come true.
Like Tapir in the elephant barn?
Panda may be expensive, but though I don't think they are the likely outcome, I do not subscribe to the it could never happen so lets talk about tapir again train of thought. Especially considering the close ties and working relationship the Victorian government has previously had with the Chinese government.
Your Nocturnal House idea is wonderful, I just think *realistically* it would fit better at Werribee.
It might be better fit in some eyes to Werribee, but it is not as big a facility as some have suggested. As stated before it would probably only be as big as the back paddock with out the barn included. This would still leave plenty of space in the remaining two paddocks for a megafauna species. The idea was born from the behind the scenes conversation I had with the mentioned LHISI keeper who explained that to display the LHISI would require a nocturnal house. My original thought was something the size of the Butterfly House or a bit smaller would suffice and could fit in that corner beside the BH's exit, and potentially tucked behind the toilet. But then researching other facilities around the world opened my eyes to the huge possibilities a larger facility could hold.
I also remember listening to Jenny Grey discussing the reason they focus on mammals and birds in their priority species program was due to they know and understand those areas of the animal kingdom, and they do not currently have the expertise to try to help save the many many insect species that are going extinct in Victoria and Australia. Starting a small to medium sized insectarium would allow ZV to start building that expertise in order to help more in the fight against the high extinction rate in that broad part of the animal kingdom.
A Nocturnal house could hold many of other species that have been discussed for other parts of the zoo. Night Hunters itself features a variety of cats, which have been discussed here for other parts of the zoo, and other amazing animals like
- the clouded leopard,
- Fishing Cats
- Pallas’ cats,
- sand cat,
- black-footed cat,
- Ocelot
- large spottet genet
- binturong
- aardvark
- aardwolf
- potto,
- vampire bats,
- fennec fox
Some of these species have been discussed for other parts of the zoo where they've been peviously held, or could be speculatively held. The beauty of a Nocturnal house, is that unlike the other locations, in this one they would be far more likely to be active giving a higher chance of customer satisfaction than when many times animals cannot be seen in their enclosure due to camouflaging, or many times they are resting as it is not the time of day/night they would usually be active. An example there Fishing Cats was mentioned as being interesting but not usually a particularly active species. At night (or in a simulated night) they are far more active.
At the end of the day, what I am excited for about elephants leaving for Werribee, other than they get a far better quality of life, is that in all likelihood the three paddocks will finally be able to be planted out. I know that it has been necessary to leave the paddocks bare, but will be so glad to not see such large swathes of bare dirt.
I was unsold on the prospect of a bear species returning to MZ due to skepticism, BUT the picture you posted of the old exhibit of the old enclosure hit me like a tonne of bricks with nostalgia and the longing to see the zoo as I remember it in the 90s. I appreciate Lion Gorge for what it is, but Lion Park, and the loss of the bears (which I realise was a little bit earlier that the reconfiguration).
I had a period where I hadn't been in years in the mid 2000s and when I did go back had a real wish to see the Seal enclosure, and had fond memories of playing on the statues at the bottom of the stairs that lead up to the viewing area. By the time I returned (and started my regular visiting) that was when Wild Seas was under construction and that will forever be a hazier growing memory. Ah memory lane.
A bear mountain as suggested before would be amazing.
Indian rhino would be great but part of me feels that if they were to move to Werribee in 10 years, why not just start them at Werribee and be done with.
The main reason I point out that Indrah and Hutan will not be housed together is because Indrah is well known as the least social of the three tigers they had (back when Binjai was alive) and that Hutan and Binjai were housed near each other with the on-display enclosure Hutan is seen in today, and a sizeable off-display enclosure that is adjacent.
The two tigers would not be put in an enclosure together, and there isn't the same space to have the two over at Lion Gorge. If they were consolidated it would be more likely that Indrah would be moved over to the off-display enclosure in TOTE (probably with the two rotating enclosures) but again I'd highly doubt that, as from the way a keeper put it recently they have found it beneficial to have the two further away from each other in order to keep them both happier. Binjai and Hutan were happy in proximity together (though not in the same enclosure) where as Indrah was found to be less than happy in the proximity to the other two.
I think we are stuck with having them in two enclosures.
Although there is no current plans or talks to import any new tiger to breed, when Indrah and Hutan (or both) pass on, I feel MZ will at that stage import a new breeding pair, and would keep the two current on-display enclosures in order to still have the space for the species.