Jackson Zoo Jackson Zoo trip report - April 2023

SwampDonkey

In the Swamp
Premium Member
5+ year member
I had a business trip to Jackson that enabled me to stop by here for a while on a Tuesday afternoon. Jackson is a zoo that is truly struggling in all facets of the word. After closing in September 2019 they lost their USDA license and did not open again until August 2020.

They are ZAA and USDA accredited, but they voluntarily gave up their AZA accreditation in 2016, which frankly is shocking that the AZA allowed them to be accredited up to that point given that they had some truly terrible cages at that point.

This place needs help. I am not sure what can be done, but they really need to work on aligning with local businesses, perhaps a out of state zoo partnership, and local resources that can assist with general maintenance and upkeep. Visitor paths are falling apart, animal signage is loose and in some places laying on the ground, the bird walk aviaries are in bad condition, parts of the zoo are chained closed, and there are far to many vacant exhibits. I have some ideas on how to remedy some of these issues, but that is outside the scope of this thread.

Driving into the zoo is a challenge....the roads are full of holes and the surrounding area is really not a good part of town. To be honest I did not feel safe leaving my bags in the car, but I also did not really have a choice.

Entry:
The entry is nicely designed and parking is easy along the park and in front of the zoo. Entry on Tuesdays is $2, other days it is $8. $2 is fair for the zoo.....$8 would feel a little expensive. $5 would be a good medium price. Oh, and cash only. They do not accept credit cards - make sure you bring cash as there is also not an ATM locally. When I was there only a few other cars were parked and I think there was 5 or 6 other people in the zoo....
full

Asian Gardens:
Immediately after entering you have the giraffe yard on your right, which is now empty as the lone giraffe died in December 2022. Beside that is another empty exhibit that has been empty since at least 2012 according to old photos here. Next in line is the former orangutan grotto, which saw the apes removed in 2017 and replaced with an Asiatic black bear. It's an OK grotto for a bear, it would have been abysmal for orangutans, so at least that is an improvement.

Empty giraffe yard:
full


Empty exhibit:
full


Asiatic Black bear exhibit:
full


Next after the bear is a rather nice exhibit for Sumatran tiger, which is a surprise at a non-AZA zoo, but seeing as they were AZA until 2016 I can see why. This is one of the newer habitats, and it shows. On balance it is better than some AZA tiger enclosures, I am particularly thinking ZooTampa for comparison.
full


Opposite the tigers are two cages for gibbons and fishing cats. Both are OK, but not great. But I don't really have any complaints. I think the gibbons are in what was at one time the Amur leopard enclosure. A recent news report stated the fishing cat exhibit was empty, but I saw one, so that is still inhabited.

Gibbon:
full


Fishing cat:
full


Flamingo, Upper and Lower Ponds:
That rounds out "Asian Garden" and takes us to the Flamingo pond, which is now vacant. It previously held American flamingo, nene, and crested screamer. The screamers were moved to the "Lower Pond", but I don't know about the nene.....the flamingo were killed in a "predation event" last year. Even though it is vacant, the pond is nicely done and the surrounding yard is green. The "Upper Pond" has black necked swan and is kind of hidden. "Lower Pond" has black necked swan, crested screamer, and supposedly other water birds, but none were to be seen. All three ponds are very pleasant and nicely designed spaces.

Wilderness Mississippi:
Next to Asian Garden and the pond is Wilderness Mississippi, what is supposedly the premier and newest area of the zoo. I say supposedly as both the main "Water Creatures" and "Backyard Creatures" buildings were chained shut. I cannot say if they still hold the otter, beaver, and snakes in those buildings. I can say the only viewable inhabitants are American alligators and cougars, both are in modern and nice looking enclosures. There is also another vacant habitat that I believe held American black bear most recently. Supposedly they have a rescued black bear, but I did not see it anywhere.

Cougars:
full


Chained shut "Water Creatures" building:
full


Bird Walk:
Behind Wilderness Mississippi is the Bird Walk area which holds red-ruffed lemur and various birds. Sadly, this area is the most dilapidated part of the zoo. The walk ways are in such disrepair that parts are taped off with caution tape and you cannot get close enough to the aviaries that are occupied to look into the dark interiors. The enclosures themselves seem to be held together with mostly hope and prayers. The Birds of Australia sign was on the ground leaning against the exhibit, which was caution taped off due to the wood walkway coming apart.

One exhibit had all the screen removed and was being used for storage, several others were empty. The blue and gold macaw and black hornbill were encased in plastic, but you could still see the macaw, but not the hornbill. I kind of doubt they were in there.

The kookaburra enclosure was OK, apparently it held prarie dogs at one time. The red-ruffed lemur was adequate if basic.

Birds of Oceania:
full


Birds of Australia:
full


Bird Walk:
full


African Savanna:
Leaving the sad Bird Walk takes you to the African Savanna, also one of the newer parts of the zoo. There are two main savanna yards and one large yard for southern white rhino. The rhino yard was previously for elephants, so it is spacious and fine. The other savanna yards have plenty of space for the few inhabitants. Zebra and klipspringer in one and sabal antelope and ostrich in the other. Unfortunately both are surrounded by large black fences, making viewing and pictures difficult.

Zebra yard:
full


White rhino:
full


African Forest:
The last main area is the African Forest, which is probably the most complete and nice area of the zoo at this point. No exhibit was empty and all were adequate to nice. The first inhabitant is a pygmy hippo in a massive yard with a natural pool. The amount of land space given them is pretty incredible compared to many zoos. Across from the hippo are common chimpanzee on their own island, which was decently designed. Again, comparing it to ZooTampa's former chimp habitat this is better.

Following the chimps are two large cages for colobus/guenon and diana monkey as well as another cage for colobus. All three monkey exhibits were nicely designed and while not large were spacious enough. Between the monkeys is a very large yard for red river hogs.
full


Hippo pond:
full


Chimp island:
full


Colobus/Guenon:
full


Diana Monkey:
full


Leaving the African Forest takes you to the last yard....an empty enclosure that most recently held red wolf.
Empty (former red wolf):
full


In conclusion, this zoo is in a sad state. It desperately needs basic maintenance for both the animals and the visitor areas. The concessions, gift shop, and main buildings are all closed. I am glad that I went, but something really must be done here. The highlights are African Forest and the Sumatran tigers, most everything else is closed or disappointing or empty. There are at least 7 major exhibits that are empty as well as quite a few smaller exhibits.
 
Last edited:
Here is an article from a month ago that details the zoo's issues pretty extensively: A Zoo Endangered: Jackson Zoo struggles with attendance, staffing, lack of animals

Overall it seems like many of the zoo's financial and safety issues tie in with the city's same problems; Jackson struggles from low incomes, high crime, poor road conditions, poor water quality, and significant population loss. Not sure if there is an easy solution, unfortunately. The article does make it sound like things have stabilized somewhat, which is a silver lining if there is any.
 
Here is an article from a month ago that details the zoo's issues pretty extensively: A Zoo Endangered: Jackson Zoo struggles with attendance, staffing, lack of animals

Overall it seems like many of the zoo's financial and safety issues tie in with the city's same problems; Jackson struggles from low incomes, high crime, poor road conditions, poor water quality, and significant population loss. Not sure if there is an easy solution, unfortunately. The article does make it sound like things have stabilized somewhat, which is a silver lining if there is any.

Thanks for the link! I saw that article before I went, and it is largely very accurate. Unfortunately some things are not correct, such as them not having fishing cats any longer. Overall it helps give a good picture, and you are right, there are no easy solutions here.

The zoo's proposition of moving to a new facility does not seem like a great fix either though, at least now they have a base to work off of, and some pretty decent habitats in places. About 60% of the zoo needs a complete overhaul, but moving is not a better solution. Simply marshaling some human power to do some basic maintenance would go a long way.

Jackson as a city is struggling very much, outside the city limits it is actually a quite pleasant area, but the city is suffering from many issues, none of which are simple or quick to fix.
 
When I was there in November they still had the black hornbill.

@SwampDonkey my feelings were exactly the same when I visited. And it does seem to be more of a city issue than the zoo itself (the roads, as you mentioned, are very rough). However there is some decent parts to the zoo (Africa Forest, Red wolf, tiger) and the admission was almost free, $2?
 
When I was there in November they still had the black hornbill.
Good to know, thanks!
@SwampDonkey my feelings were exactly the same when I visited. And it does seem to be more of a city issue than the zoo itself (the roads, as you mentioned, are very rough). However there is some decent parts to the zoo (Africa Forest, Red wolf, tiger) and the admission was almost free, $2?
Ha, yeah, $2 is a good deal and it is $2 every Tuesday. Normally $8, which is not bad if everything is open, but if the main buildings are closed it is a bit high, IMO. The red wolf looked nice, but is also empty now, unfortunately (or at least it was un-signed and appeared empty). Africa Forest was my favorite area.
 
That makes sense it was special $2 day. Wow, in a short time (since I visited) they went out of the wolves and giraffe. The wilderness Mississippi was also closed when I went but looked fairly nice
 
The article states:
"Records obtained by WLBT earlier this year show keepers earn just under $32,000 a year. The highest-paid person on staff earns around $69,900 annually, records show.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics show the median salary for zoologists and wildlife biologists with just a bachelor’s degree is $64,650 a year, or $31.08 an hour."

Huge difference between a zookeeper and a zoologist... no zookeeper in the country is going to be making $64k a year lol. $32k a year (unfortunately) isn't half bad for a zookeeper salary honestly.
 
Thank you @SwampDonkey for providing an overview of the state of this zoo. It especially bothers me that Eko the Sumatran tiger will apparently never get a chance to breed since the female there is his mother and he was his father's only offspring, but at least it sounds like he has a nice space there.
 
Thank you for all these reviews @SwampDonkey, as well as all the new photos uploaded! Zoos in the Southeast region (outside FL and maybe North Carolina) remain relatively obscure, so I especially appreciate updates from there. Unfortunately Mississippi is a state with major financial issues across the board, so its not such a surprise that the zoos suffer. I do wonder how the two AZA facilities are holding up? There are no recent photos of Hattiesburg Zoo and none of Mississippi Aquarium. I do hope to one day visit even these facilities.
 
Thanks for the excellent review of a struggling zoo. I posted a long, detailed review on my Snowleopard's 2012 Road Trip thread (on page 12) that mentions "an overall apathy", how the zoo "is in dire need of refurbishment in many areas", has many empty enclosures, and "there is a long list of other exhibits that badly need to be renovated or even razed to the ground".

I really enjoyed the Mississippi Wilderness section, which opened in 2006 and is the best section of the zoo in my opinion, and my 3 paragraphs on that area show that the zoo had a fine collection of native species in 2012. African Forest and the tiger enclosure were highlights then, but so much of the zoo was awful and that hasn't changed in the ensuing years.

It's an embarrassment that the capitol city of the state of Mississippi has such a terrible zoo and I agree that it's in a really dodgy part of town. In recent years, the homicide rate in Jackson has broken records for all the wrong reasons and it seems that eventually the zoo will close down for good.
 
I dug out a zoo map from 2000 and it's interesting to note what mammals Jackson Zoo had back then that are no longer around. African Elephants, Malayan Tapirs, Nile Lechwe, Orangutans, Amur Leopards, Snow Leopards, Cheetahs, American Black Bears, Red Pandas, etc. I guess that all those species, and plenty of others, have now permanently left the collection.
 
They replied to a comment on Facebook stating that the staff have discretion to close buildings due to maintenance, etc. but that Water Creatures is "usually open". I kind of doubt that being as it was closed when both I and @PSO visited several months separately.

I really hope that this zoo can turn it around. They don't have to do any grand expansions or remodeling, some simple maintenance and improvements would go a long way.
 
I knew the zoo was struggling, but wow :( With fixing vs starting fresh, it can often be cheaper to start anew instead of having to dismantle/get rid of problems. They could likely do well with a much smaller footprint and some easier species. The chimps, especially, really need to find a new home, since they require so much attention.

Did you see a klipspringer?
 
I knew the zoo was struggling, but wow :( With fixing vs starting fresh, it can often be cheaper to start anew instead of having to dismantle/get rid of problems. They could likely do well with a much smaller footprint and some easier species. The chimps, especially, really need to find a new home, since they require so much attention.

Did you see a klipspringer?
I'm not sure how much smaller of a footprint they would want, it is already a rather small zoo. The biggest drawback from their location is the surrounding part of the city, it is really rough.

I agree though, if I were in charge I would swap the chimps and tigers out for less intensive and expensive to maintain animals. Even just changing the two Sumatran tigers for one generic would be a good option, then the genetics of Eko would be available and they would only have to keep one tiger. Honestly, since they are non-AZA and are not aspiring to be AZA it gives them a lot of options for acquiring animals that might not be available to AZA zoos.

I did not see the klipspringer, unfortunately. They are in one of the largest yards with the zebra, so they have a lot of space to hide out. But I have seen recent pictures of them on social media, so they are still there.
 
I dug out a zoo map from 2000 and it's interesting to note what mammals Jackson Zoo had back then that are no longer around. African Elephants, Malayan Tapirs, Nile Lechwe, Orangutans, Amur Leopards, Snow Leopards, Cheetahs, American Black Bears, Red Pandas, etc. I guess that all those species, and plenty of others, have now permanently left the collection.

You wouldn't happen to have a scan of it would you?
 
The thing about this place is that you can see where they were making the right decisions up until around 2018 or so. They shuffled some animals out while also renovating some of the more depressing spots. It really would not take that much effort to get it into a position where it is a pretty decent non-AZA city zoo.

Even back in 2012 when they were still AZA you can see where they needed to improve - and they did. Moving the gibbons from the awful cage they were in at that time to the previous Amur leopard enclosure where they are now was right to do and an upgrade. Moving out the orangutans (in 2017), snow leopards, and elephants (in 2010) was right. Loosing the red panda since then was a downgrade for sure.

Some of the animals moving out was related to voluntarily giving up their AZA accreditation in 2016; for example, the orangutans were, and maybe the red panda?

The recent loss of the red wolves could be replaced by coyotes from local rescues. The giraffe could be replaced by another hoofstock, maybe blackbuck or water buffalo (it is in the Asian area). There are creative and relativly inexpensive options that could be employed with the right management and leadership.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how much smaller of a footprint they would want, it is already a rather small zoo. The biggest drawback from their location is the surrounding part of the city, it is really rough.

I agree though, if I were in charge I would swap the chimps and tigers out for less intensive and expensive to maintain animals. Even just changing the two Sumatran tigers for one generic would be a good option, then the genetics of Eko would be available and they would only have to keep one tiger. Honestly, since they are non-AZA and are not aspiring to be AZA it gives them a lot of options for acquiring animals that might not be available to AZA zoos.

I did not see the klipspringer, unfortunately. They are in one of the largest yards with the zebra, so they have a lot of space to hide out. But I have seen recent pictures of them on social media, so they are still there.

You still have to be a decent sized place to have chimps, multiple large carnivores, rhinos, etc. If they relocated they could start smaller and build up as they were able to, vs barely managing to hold on as they are. Things have only continued to get worse, any further and you're into the territory of neglect (which I'm sure the few employees are trying so hard to keep from happening!)

Klipspringer has been missing from multiple USDA inspections now. Occasionally a species might accidentally get left off, but that usually fixes itself by the next inspection. Very odd.
 
You still have to be a decent sized place to have chimps, multiple large carnivores, rhinos, etc. If they relocated they could start smaller and build up as they were able to, vs barely managing to hold on as they are. Things have only continued to get worse, any further and you're into the territory of neglect (which I'm sure the few employees are trying so hard to keep from happening!)
Valid points :)
Klipspringer has been missing from multiple USDA inspections now. Occasionally a species might accidentally get left off, but that usually fixes itself by the next inspection. Very odd.
Strange. Here is a link to an Instagram post they made last week about them:
https://www.instagram.com/p/Cqf1OQNPlSC/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
 
Back
Top