It's important to note when discussing any new exhibit nowadays the extremely high cost for many new exhibits. Not every zoo has the luxury to spend over $40 million on a single species, like Lincoln Park Zoo and its new lion exhibit, and sometimes zoos, either by choice or by necessity, need to make the fiscally responsible choice and build a functional exhibit that promotes good welfare, but is not as visually impressive and world-class as a more expensive exhibit would be. I don't think anyone would call the Kodiak Ridge exhibit "world-class", but I don't think the intention was to build a "world-class" exhibit either. Instead, the goal was to build a feasible, fiscally responsible exhibit to provide a better home for the zoo's bears, which is something I can certainly respect. Even bigger and well-known zoos can't always spend what it takes to make a world-class exhibit, and that doesn't always need to be the goal either, especially in a world where even a fairly basic exhibit for a large carnivore is a multimillion dollar project. If this exhibit improves the quality of life for the bears, and provides strong welfare and educational goals, then I don't see much worth criticizing, even if with an unlimited budget a better exhibit could theoretically be built.