Your posts always read like you can't separate individuals from concepts, like you think that a person who is interested in X and thinks Y about it therefore means that everybody else interested in X thinks the exact same
See also the claim that:
"a pretty good-sized chunk of those on paleontology or those into paleontology is in favor of pleistocene rewilding. You'll hear them say it could work. I think the reason they're in favor of it is that deep down, they wish they could live with the ice age giant"
...with a subsequent clarification that he did include professional palaeontologists in this judgement. The phrasing of "on palaeontology" and "into palaeontology" gives massive vibes of dismissing the whole field too, as if it were some recreational drug