The Shore Oceanarium, Melaka review

Zhao yun

Well-Known Member
This afternoon, I went to the Shore Oceanarium with my sister. This facility is the only aquarium in Melaka. However, it is an atrocious excuse for an aquarium. Although it calls itself an oceanarium, that is probably not the case, and it is probably the worst aquarium to ever grace (or disgrace) zoochat. Anyway, before we go on, just want to make a few generalisations.
  1. The signage is not the best, with whole galleries missing their signs. In some cases, the signs were impressively outdated and the whole thing felt incredibly makeshift.
2.The exhibits were decorated by someone with the taste of a child. This is particularly apparent in the exhibit sequence near the exit. Also, most, if not all were too small.

The first exhibit upon entering was a series of 5 touch pools. Interestingly, there was a screen which showed some AR miscellany, such as fireballs and elephant. The first 2 pools housed some echinoderms which were surprisingly unsigned. The next was overstocked with a number of bamboo sharks. Their exhibit was clearly not designed with the sharks, giving them nowhere to hide from visitors. The pools that followed housed horseshoe crabs and a rather large spiny lobster. The exhibits in the same cove were a tall set of pet-store sized fishtanks. They were rather small and housed a group of reef fish. The tanks were too small for their inhabitants, and the fish looked pale from stress. There was a tank for an impressive Australian lobster which was rather bare, and did not provide the reef habitat that this species resides in. Another habitat housed blood parrot cichlids, which had a magic effect which involved water being drawn into cup-like areas via a vacumn.
Interestingly, there was a screen showing a game of fruit ninja, which you could play, I kid you not. However, this further proved to me that this aquarium wanted to be everything, which I found ironic and a little sad. There was a plant growing area which showed off riparian plants. This area had the only decent exhibit, which housed a few shrimp. Next to this admittedly impressive display was an all-concrete abomination that housed a few box turtles and a hinge-backed turtle. The water was a few inches deep, and it was the worst turtle exhibit in any public aquarium that I've seen.
Next was the jungle exhibit. It had one of the worst herp displays, and anything they had was stuffed into a glass cell. I'm not saying this in a PETA way, but literally. It had a seemingly out-of-place display for pinned insects, which were probably glad at the sweet release of death seeing all these horrendous exhibits .Antromorphic, but true.
 
The following tank, however, fared much better. If it didn't, I would have ran out of there. It was an open ocean style display, which was probably the only saving grace of this place. It held a few schooling fish and had a small cavern, presumably where the grouper stalked its prey. On a nearby wall was a series of tiny tanks with some frogs, showing the life cycle of the frog. There was also a multi-media theatre for humans to watch shows about marine life. Well, more weird excuses for documentaries anyway.
The following tunnel had a shallow exhibit for blacktip reef sharks. It was too shallow, and the sharks were stunted. There was also a reef tank for a few miscellaneous fish, which was adorned with a few artificial corals which looked that they were not maintained in years. A shark cage experience, which was really a cheap excuse of a spare corner. It was clearly not designed for accuracy, but it entertains the guests, so why not. At least the shark tunnel had some decent signage, but the reef sharks were not signed.
 
Thanks for your review. One would think that a big city, with a large population, in the year 2023, would be able to maintain a modern, impressive-sized aquarium. Some of the tanks here are embarrassingly tiny and hardly offer up enough room for the inhabitants to even turn around.
 
Thanks for your review. One would think that a big city, with a large population, in the year 2023, would be able to maintain a modern, impressive-sized aquarium. Some of the tanks here are embarrassingly tiny and hardly offer up enough room for the inhabitants to even turn around.
Sorry, said review is not complete yet. I will finish when I get home. Agree with all your points though. By the time I scampered out of the aquarium, I was ready to swallow the management whole.
 
Not to derail my own thread, but in what way is this aquarium infamous?
Because it is sooooo terrible. It's like one of those movies that are so terrible they start to get a following because they are so bad. Apparently no live animals, other than maybe a turtle, some taxidermy animals, and the tanks have been left so long they are black with gunk.
 
Finally, I have found time to continue my review of the Shore Oceanarium. The last time we left off, we covered the shark tunnel tank and went towards the next area, a series of reef tanks housing other miscellaneous fish and a ray tank similar to the shark exhibit. The decent fish tanks restored some of my hope for this crumbling place. Another highlight was a 75-gallon tank that looked like a community tank at home. However, all that was destroyed by the next gallery, which while educating others about aquarium maintenance(rather ironic), had an oversized pufferfish in a columnar exhibit with nothing but the fish itself. It had a jet of bubbles and was too small for the dog-faced puffer to grow.
The next gallery was a psychedelic area with glowing neon lights as its theme, looking like a maze. It had a veritable horde of miscellaneous rift lake cichlids and glowing serpae tetras. Mirrors lined the gallery and it was just a cheap knockoff of the one goldfish museum in Tokyo. However, this display was generally creepy, and the following exhibit was just a lantern area, further reinforcing the notion that this place just wanted to do everything badly instead of doing just one thing well and leaving it at that.
Afterwards, there was this obnoxiously ugly crawl tunnel with rays, and finally, we reached one of the OK galleries. The exhibits housed a few species of freshwater fish, and the main gripe I have is that the lungfish exhibit was about the size of the one at the Bronx Zoo and not in a good way. Also, do you have to use the mind-bending garish pink gravel all the time? The rest are all similar to the average home aquarium but with equally dumb signage. The following exhibit showcased a few miscellaneous tinfoil barbs. From a previous visit as a young kid, I remembered sturgeon, but they probably perished soon after, and they probably could not acquire more as they were either short on funds, or just incapable, which is for the better based on the clumsy(at best) care in the oceanarium. Another row of tanks housed oddball fish in tiny boxes. However, to fill a tank, they just placed a pendant coralfish in the tank. Finally, there were a few Kreisel tanks meant to house jellyfish. As with anything remotely of interest to the average Zoochatter, they were unfortunately dead and replaced with a motley assortment of African cichlids. However, this change was not reflected in the signs, and they will not acquire new jellyfish. Lastly, the ex-hawksbill turtle exhibit was the finale, but it was stocked with freshwater fish, which was for the better as the exhibit was tiny for turtles.
All in all, the shore oceanarium is one of the worst aquariums which you can visit in your life. However, its problems are due to its attempts to mimic everything in the world, which leads to low-budget exhibitry and inadequate housing as it rushes everywhere, imitating everything, and creating more nightmares in its wake. However, if it gets its act together, it would make a great oceanarium.
 
Back
Top