Frankie_number_1_fan
Well-Known Member
Oh definitely its not 100% the SSP's fault. Its a team effort and several zoos have not been being great team players...I think it's important to note that they are labelled as 'recommendations' for a reason. Zoos aren't always bound to follow the recommendations and I know of many instances when zoos have sat on recommendations or even gone against them. Unfortunately the SSP cannot do much in that situation. I'm not saying this is the case all the time but certainly has to be taken into consideration. Imo the SSP has made some questionable moves in the last decade but I wouldn't point all of them down to 'mismanagement'.
It still baffles me that the SSP/AZA doesn't have more "power" over these transfers so to speak. Especially in a situation like St Louis. Raja likely has a plethora of breeding reccomendations that the zoo has ignored, if the SSP could intervene and force the zoo's hand then this wouldn't be an issue, but I imagine that kind of power wouldn't always be a good thing for the same reason, as obviously the SSP coordinators don't work with the animals on a daily basis as the keepers do and may make a call less than ideal for am animals' wellbeing.
In terms of "mismanagement" I meant less SSP management and more how the zoos deal with their programs individually. I'd find it hard to call Columbus risking letting their cows lose reproductive viability something OTHER than "mismanagement" of their elephant program. Id call the St Louis decisions the same thing.
Imo there certainly needs to be stricter regulation of the NA breeding program. Letting zoos make such questionable decisions is going to run the program into the ground someday.