My Plan for Smithsonian’s National Zoo

Brayden Delashmutt

Well-Known Member
Made a thread on this a while back, but it didn’t gain much traction, so I’ve basically redone my plan and here it is…

The Smithsonian’s National Zoo is definitely one of the best I’ve been too. Exhibit quality was high, and the collection was full of rarities I had never seen before. For a species list hunter, the national zoo is definitely one of the best institutions to visit. However, I can’t help but feel it’s a bit underwhelming for the national zoo of the United States-after all, the facility doesn’t even keep giraffes, let alone polar bears, hippos, or any other charismatic megafauna. In my speculative plan, I’d like to touch on the outdoor areas of the zoo, and change it up a bit to not only include some rarities, but also some species it’s in dire need of. I’ll be making a series of posts following this on what my plan for the zoo would be, so please check those out!
 
The national zoo is a largely taxonomic collection, and I’d try to keep it that way. The current buildings have an absolutely outstanding collection as is, and to be honest, I don’t think I’d change it up very much. This is probably less speculative and more fantasy, as I don’t anticipate the zoo doing anything like this. Regardless, given large funds, this is what I would do to the zoo.

Small Mammal House

- If the current collection is to be kept, some major renovations need to be done to the actual exhibits. While optimally the current collection could stay in its entirety, space is limited and some of the horribly outdated exhibits (sand cats, fennec foxes) might have to be combined for the animal’s sake.
- While the outside is beautiful, I’d like to see the inside modernized a bit like the bird house. Either the exhibits could be arranged taxonomically, or the exhibits could be set up to show small mammal variety across many different ecosystems (i.e. a desert room with fennecs and naked mole rats, a rainforest room with anteaters and small primates, etc)
- Outside of the building, there used to be a series of larger exhibits. To my knowledge they held anteaters and capybara at one point? These could be reworked to hold kangaroos, and maybe even koalas if the zoo could obtain them
- The outside’s architecture is very cool, but in the same way the bird house was, I’d touch it up a little.

Reptile House

- My comments about the small mammal house work here as well.
- I feel like the current outdoor exhibits could work indoors given proper space. It’d be really cool to see large and small reptiles exhibited alongside each other, to show the extreme diversity of the reptiles
- Since the exhibit follows the theme of the Mesozoic era anyways, I don’t feel like it’d hurt to add a few fossils in the exhibit next to displays of modern reptiles. In addition to the biome theme, a theme of reptile evolution could work very well.
- I wasn’t able to visit the reptile house on my visit (it was too crowded and the buildings really aren’t designed for that) so the building is in need of being reworked to hold large crowds. Even the small mammal house was noisy and packed in the tiny hallways (I had to shove through hordes of children to see the Pygmy slow loris, lol)

Primate House

- IMO, the current ape building is rather disgusting looking. Given the chance I’d give it a total facelift, and turn it in to a primate house.
Large primates like gorillas and orangs would get expanded outdoor areas, and chimps could be added to the collection.
- With limited room left in the small mammal house, the simians from there could be moved here. While only the great apes would get large outdoor areas, the building could feature a few spacious areas for smaller primates indoors. Some rarities like Proboscis Monkeys would be superb
- The building seems so ugly IMO because of the fact that it doesn’t match with the rest of the zoo’s architecture. Use brick or limestone to make the walls, and give it an older, classic primate house feel. And while you’re at it, make the indoor area look less like a prison
- Not sure think tank needs to exist-that can just be incorporated into the current primate house

Bird House

- I’m honestly quite surprised how little people talk about this. On my most recent visit, I was able to see the renovated bird house-and it was EXCELLENT. This should be the standard for bird houses in AZA zoos IMO. I wouldn’t change much at all, except for bringing in more exotic birds.
- I’d absolutely love to see an Antarctic Penguin area in here. If that’s not realistic, then at least throw in some African or Humboldt penguins.

- While the indoor area is excellent, the outdoors…not so much. Most of the exhibits were boring pens for flightless birds or just sloppy looking mesh aviaries. I’d get rid of these, and use this area later in the masterplan.
- I would like to move andean flamingos somewhere near this building, as they’re an increasingly rare species in the AZA and one I have yet to see.
- A few of the raptors could be kept, and moved into San Diego style aviaries near the entrance of the building

Carnivora (Great Cats, Bears, etc)

- I did incorporate this in my previous masterplan, but not to this extent. The majority of the front of the zoo, from where great cats is to where Amazonia is, would be renovated to become a taxonomic and somewhat geographically themed carnivore area featuring cats, dogs, and bears

Phase One: Great Cats

- This area definitely deserves a facelift. The exhibits are functional, but in the same vain as the Great Ape House, they’re boring and ugly.
- I’d add a brick/limestone building known as the Great Cat house to match with the zoo’s other buildings. Indoors, I would feature several small cats (as well as possibly some other feliforms), as well as naturalistic indoor exhibits for leopards, lions, and tigers reminiscent of those at Berlin. What subspecies of leopard I’d exhibit is up in the air-while Amur is of course the most likely, I’d do literally anything to see Persian or Indian leopards.
- The outdoor portions for lions and tigers would be about the same size as the current ones, but more naturalistic. A big cat trail could be created, allowing visitors to see the cats from multiple angles, as well as allowing the cats to rotate through different exhibits
- The leopard exhibit could use wire mesh similar to the exhibit in San Diego’s acacia forest, and also be integrated into the big cat trail.

Phase Two: Bears (and dogs)

- The current Amazonia, Spectacled Bear, and surrounding area would be turned into an area for bears. The Amazonia building IS great and I’d move the collection elsewhere, but I’d turn that area and the current spectacled bear area into one for polar bears. Grizzlies could be added alongside them.
- If pandas ever return to the zoo, I’d add them here, instead of their current exhibit in Asia Trail. I’d still add heavy Asian theming with actual bamboo and several naturalistic habitats.

- The rest of the area here (probably the current children’s zoo) would go to the dogs. An exhibit for Arctic wolves and African wild dogs would be present here, as well as, possibly, some smaller canids (though they could simply be worked into the small mammal house)

“Pachyderm” House

- By far the biggest change in the zoo’s layout would be a large facility for hippos, rhinoceros, giraffes, and elephants. The giraffes and other Savannah animals (zebras, ostrich, etc) could be moved into the current “African Trail”, replacing the current exhibits with a large Savannah.
- While the Asian elephants could be kept, making an exhibit like the one at Dallas, combining African elephants with other Savannah fauna, would be superb. I’d choose that over the current elephant area, but their building is already so good that I’d keep that core structure.
- Hippopotamus and Indian rhinoceros would both end up getting large exhibits nearby, with Indian rhinoceros taking up most of the current Asia Trail and hippos using the area which once held pandas.
- The current Asian Trail mammals could be phased out, but I’d prefer moving them into the small mammal house or into other miscellaneous areas in the zoo

- The bison nearby could be kept. While American bison absolutely need to stay at the zoo, I’d like to see wisents in a corresponding exhibit as well. Just my thoughts.
- Move some of the displaced hoofstock over here as well, as well as some true rarities (maybe some rare antelope or small cervids?). Camels would be nice too.

- While the American trail wouldn’t exist in near the capacity it once did (or maybe not at all), I’d still keep the pinniped exhibits. While I don’t think there will be enough room left for both sea lions and seals, one of the two could be kept (or they could just be combined)

- Overall, I’d like to see more interactive displays in the indoor exhibits. For the cats, for example, I’d love to use games and displays like Berlin’s felid house.

So, with that aside, those are my current plans for the national zoo, as outlandish as they are. Feel free to comment ideas down in the thread below
 
- I would like to move andean flamingos somewhere near this building, as they’re an increasingly rare species in the AZA and one I have yet to see.
Andean flamingos are not a species kept in the AZA, and I'm not aware of if they ever have been.

- I’d absolutely love to see an Antarctic Penguin area in here. If that’s not realistic, then at least throw in some African or Humboldt penguins.
Doesn't this disrupt the theming of the bird house, which is focused on conservation issues related to migration and different habitat types frequented by migratory birds?

- With limited room left in the small mammal house, the simians from there could be moved here. While only the great apes would get large outdoor areas, the building could feature a few spacious areas for smaller primates indoors. Some rarities like Proboscis Monkeys would be superb
Proboscis monkeys are not a primate I'd recommend, even if you treat "rarity status" as an important part of collection planning. They simply are too difficult of a species to care for properly, especially in terms of their diet, to make an import worthwhile. Instead, silvered leaf langurs are an increasingly rare sight in zoos, and one that could use extra support if you are interested, there is a globally managed program for Javan gibbons (based out of Australasia, but three US facilities participate), the AZA-accredited Cali Zoo in Colombia has a breeding program for white-footed tamarins that could potentially be partnered with, or from Europe one could import Sulawesi or lion-tailed macaques, or gelada. These are the sorts of rarities that I'd say warrant consideration for zoos, not something like proboscis monkeys or doucs that simply don't thrive well.
- The current Amazonia, Spectacled Bear, and surrounding area would be turned into an area for bears. The Amazonia building IS great and I’d move the collection elsewhere, but I’d turn that area and the current spectacled bear area into one for polar bears. Grizzlies could be added alongside them.
- Hippopotamus and Indian rhinoceros would both end up getting large exhibits nearby, with Indian rhinoceros taking up most of the current Asia Trail and hippos using the area which once held pandas.
- The current Asian Trail mammals could be phased out, but I’d prefer moving them into the small mammal house or into other miscellaneous areas in the zoo
So your plan is to demolish what two of the zoos newest and best exhibits are? Normally, a good masterplan is targeted and focuses on where the zoo is most in need of improvement, not focusing on replacing large and successful exhibits that are still quite good. Are there ways Amazonia or Asia Trail could be improved? I'm certain. But removing them seems like, quite frankly, a waste of time and money at a zoo that due to bureaucracy has struggled to build new exhibits in a timely fashion.
- While the Asian elephants could be kept, making an exhibit like the one at Dallas, combining African elephants with other Savannah fauna, would be superb. I’d choose that over the current elephant area, but their building is already so good that I’d keep that core structure.
Seeing as the zoo recently imported two Asian elephants, they seem quite dedicated to the species. Perhaps instead of an African savanna area, you could consider a mixed-species set-up with the Asian elephant herd? I know SCBI works with some of the Asian deer species, so it seems like something that could be rather feasible for them to try.
 
- I’m honestly quite surprised how little people talk about this. On my most recent visit, I was able to see the renovated bird house-and it was EXCELLENT. This should be the standard for bird houses in AZA zoos IMO. I wouldn’t change much at all, except for bringing in more exotic birds.

It's been talked about a good deal, for how long it took to get renovations accomplished and the resulting excellent bird house. The focus is supposed to be on native species and not exotics.

- I’d absolutely love to see an Antarctic Penguin area in here. If that’s not realistic, then at least throw in some African or Humboldt penguins.

Completely unnecessary - it is both not the focus and would take too much space. The area literally took multiple years to bring it to where it is now, adding penguins would be a major waste.

- I would like to move andean flamingos somewhere near this building, as they’re an increasingly rare species in the AZA and one I have yet to see.

As Neil stated, Andean Flamingos are not present in the AZA and I'm not sure they ever have been. I assume you're not meaning the American Flamingos?

- A few of the raptors could be kept, and moved into San Diego style aviaries near the entrance of the building

The gigantic raptor aviaries built onto the slope, or different ones?

I’d do literally anything to see Persian or Indian leopards.

Why? Amur needs holders and is readily available.

- The current Amazonia, Spectacled Bear, and surrounding area would be turned into an area for bears. The Amazonia building IS great and I’d move the collection elsewhere, but I’d turn that area and the current spectacled bear area into one for polar bears. Grizzlies could be added alongside them

Terrible idea. Right now Polar Bears aren't very available and demolishing that much area for them is silly. Spectacled Bears and Polar Bears are quite different in exhibit needs at that.

- If pandas ever return to the zoo, I’d add them here, instead of their current exhibit in Asia Trail. I’d still add heavy Asian theming with actual bamboo and several naturalistic habitats.

...what's wrong with actually using the existing dedicated panda facilities?

- Hippopotamus and Indian rhinoceros would both end up getting large exhibits nearby, with Indian rhinoceros taking up most of the current Asia Trail and hippos using the area which once held pandas.
- The current Asian Trail mammals could be phased out, but I’d prefer moving them into the small mammal house or into other miscellaneous areas in the zoo

Most species currently on Asia Trail are far more in need of holders than Hippo or Indian Rhino.

I’d like to see wisents in a corresponding exhibit as well.

Why? They're absent from NA and they'd be taking up space unnecessarily.
 
Doesn't this disrupt the theming of the bird house, which is focused on conservation issues related to migration and different habitat types frequented by migratory birds?

Maybe so. Outside is kinda a free for all tho, as it doesn't have any theming-maybe they'd work there?

Proboscis monkeys are not a primate I'd recommend, even if you treat "rarity status" as an important part of collection planning. They simply are too difficult of a species to care for properly, especially in terms of their diet, to make an import worthwhile. Instead, silvered leaf langurs are an increasingly rare sight in zoos, and one that could use extra support if you are interested, there is a globally managed program for Javan gibbons (based out of Australasia, but three US facilities participate), the AZA-accredited Cali Zoo in Colombia has a breeding program for white-footed tamarins that could potentially be partnered with, or from Europe one could import Sulawesi or lion-tailed macaques, or gelada. These are the sorts of rarities that I'd say warrant consideration for zoos, not something like proboscis monkeys or doucs that simply don't thrive well.

Alright, I'll change it to Geladas or some sort of macaque.

So your plan is to demolish what two of the zoos newest and best exhibits are? Normally, a good masterplan is targeted and focuses on where the zoo is most in need of improvement, not focusing on replacing large and successful exhibits that are still quite good. Are there ways Amazonia or Asia Trail could be improved? I'm certain. But removing them seems like, quite frankly, a waste of time and money at a zoo that due to bureaucracy has struggled to build new exhibits in a timely fashion.

Fair, though maybe I'd keep them around. I'll probably turn them in to something similar to what they are today, though not exactly the same. Not a huge fan of mixing taxonomic and geographic exhibits, tho that's just me.

Seeing as the zoo recently imported two Asian elephants, they seem quite dedicated to the species. Perhaps instead of an African savanna area, you could consider a mixed-species set-up with the Asian elephant herd? I know SCBI works with some of the Asian deer species, so it seems like something that could be rather feasible for them to try.

YES. Chital would be great. Indian rhinos nearby too.
 
It's been talked about a good deal, for how long it took to get renovations accomplished and the resulting excellent bird house. The focus is supposed to be on native species and not exotics

...but a major portion of the exhibit is focused on Central America, not native. I see your point, but at least bring in penguins somewhere...

Completely unnecessary - it is both not the focus and would take too much space. The area literally took multiple years to bring it to where it is now, adding penguins would be a major waste.

How so?

Neil stated, Andean Flamingos are not present in the AZA and I'm not sure they ever have been. I assume you're not meaning the American Flamingos?

I am not. I'm not a Flamingo expert, dyk if they need any holders? I figured they did, sorry

gigantic raptor aviaries built onto the slope, or different ones?

Yes. Those can stay

Why? Amur needs holders and is readily available.

Amur has hundreds of holders, I don't see a problem with adding a few other subspecies.

Terrible idea. Right now Polar Bears aren't very available and demolishing that much area for them is silly. Spectacled Bears and Polar Bears are quite different in exhibit needs at that.

Dang, okay. I never said they didn't have different exhibit needs, I literally stated that the current exhibits would be demolished. But even if Polar bears weren't available, there would still be room for Grizzlies nearby.

..what's wrong with actually using the existing dedicated panda facilities?

They're on the other side of the zoo lol

Most species currently on Asia Trail are far more in need of holders than Hippo or Indian Rhino.

Yeah, but where would you put them?

Why? They're absent from NA and they'd be taking up space unnecessarily.

They're an interesting species, and could help educate the public about rewilding and conservation efforts
 
To address these points:
  • Humboldt or Magellanic penguins could be a decent standalone exhibit, perhaps near Amazonia and the Andean bears since the filtration infrastructure for aquatic animals like the sea lions, harbor seals, beavers and otters is already in place. I do think that the sites surrounding Amazonia are underutilized, and could also make for some stellar jaguar/maned wolf exhibits. Ideally, most if not all SCBI species would be held at the zoo.
  • Take the sheer red tape and bureaucracy the zoo went through to add a *shed* to their lesser kudu habitat, and multiply that 10 times over for the Bird House. Not to mention restoring an older building from the 1900s versus building a new one...
  • Not possible to bring in Andean flamingos, Americans are a good stand-in. (Plus, it's a species the zoo already has.)
  • The zoo does have bald eagles on the American Trail, but more raptors nearby the Bird House could be a decent addition!
  • Amur leopards absolutely need all the holders they can get considering zoos are an ark for their genetic diversity.
  • The reason National Zoo sent their polar bears elsewhere is because of the sheer sweltering heat in DC. So long as Maryland gets polar bears back (apparently they are on a waitlist to get new bears but needed to maximize space for their grizzlies, Nova and Nita) and transit between Maryland and DC is affordable, people will be able to see quite a few bear species if they choose to go between Maryland (grizzly and *ideally* polar) and DC (sloth, Andean, and giant panda after the renovations are complete, but we'll get to that). THAT SAID, American black bears could be a fun addition to the zoo given the zoo's history with Smokey the Bear, if they are able to rejuvenate the old bear grottoes alongside the current Smokey The Bear graphics.
  • That's not enough of a justification for the zoo to suddenly upend their giant panda facilities at all. The zoo's already spending the money to renovate those existing facilities in expectation of new pandas, and those exhibits (alongside Elephant Trails) anchor a pretty stellar Asian section.
  • Apparently new facilities for cranes, Indian rhinos and Bactrian camels were to be included in Asia Trail but were cut due to rising costs of development. I could see National bringing Indian rhinos back further down the line in the land behind the Asian small-clawed otter exhibit and creating a dynamic mixed-species environment with Eld's deer (another SCBI species) and even creating filter gates between the rhino and elephant exhibits that the deer can cross through.
  • Hippos... as cool as it'd be for National to bring those back, increasing AZA requirements plus the sheer cost of filtration systems for their pools would be extremely cost-prohibitive for the zoo. Pygmy hippos on the other hand do need more holders, and would be a much more worthwhile investment!
  • Wisent would just be redundant. Given the zoo's history with saving American bison versus just getting wisent for the sake of it, I think the zoo'll just stick with the more relevant species.
 
To address these points:
  • Humboldt or Magellanic penguins could be a decent standalone exhibit, perhaps near Amazonia and the Andean bears since the filtration infrastructure for aquatic animals like the sea lions, harbor seals, beavers and otters is already in place. I do think that the sites surrounding Amazonia are underutilized, and could also make for some stellar jaguar/maned wolf exhibits. Ideally, most if not all SCBI species would be held at the zoo.
  • Take the sheer red tape and bureaucracy the zoo went through to add a *shed* to their lesser kudu habitat, and multiply that 10 times over for the Bird House. Not to mention restoring an older building from the 1900s versus building a new one...
  • Not possible to bring in Andean flamingos, Americans are a good stand-in. (Plus, it's a species the zoo already has.)
  • The zoo does have bald eagles on the American Trail, but more raptors nearby the Bird House could be a decent addition!
  • Amur leopards absolutely need all the holders they can get considering zoos are an ark for their genetic diversity.
  • The reason National Zoo sent their polar bears elsewhere is because of the sheer sweltering heat in DC. So long as Maryland gets polar bears back (apparently they are on a waitlist to get new bears but needed to maximize space for their grizzlies, Nova and Nita) and transit between Maryland and DC is affordable, people will be able to see quite a few bear species if they choose to go between Maryland (grizzly and *ideally* polar) and DC (sloth, Andean, and giant panda after the renovations are complete, but we'll get to that). THAT SAID, American black bears could be a fun addition to the zoo given the zoo's history with Smokey the Bear, if they are able to rejuvenate the old bear grottoes alongside the current Smokey The Bear graphics.
  • That's not enough of a justification for the zoo to suddenly upend their giant panda facilities at all. The zoo's already spending the money to renovate those existing facilities in expectation of new pandas, and those exhibits (alongside Elephant Trails) anchor a pretty stellar Asian section.
  • Apparently new facilities for cranes, Indian rhinos and Bactrian camels were to be included in Asia Trail but were cut due to rising costs of development. I could see National bringing Indian rhinos back further down the line in the land behind the Asian small-clawed otter exhibit and creating a dynamic mixed-species environment with Eld's deer (another SCBI species) and even creating filter gates between the rhino and elephant exhibits that the deer can cross through.
  • Hippos... as cool as it'd be for National to bring those back, increasing AZA requirements plus the sheer cost of filtration systems for their pools would be extremely cost-prohibitive for the zoo. Pygmy hippos on the other hand do need more holders, and would be a much more worthwhile investment!
  • Wisent would just be redundant. Given the zoo's history with saving American bison versus just getting wisent for the sake of it, I think the zoo'll just stick with the more relevant species.

Thank you for the input, I agree. I'll take these into account. Also, dyk when the zoo last kept polar bears?
 
Thank you for the input, I agree. I'll take these into account. Also, dyk when the zoo last kept polar bears?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...ec6882-4e94-11ea-bf44-f5043eb3918a_story.html
This should be a pretty concise overview of the zoo's history with polar bears.

On a side note, I do have some ideas of my own that National could implement, if you're interested.
  • A new parking garage in order to free up some of the existing parking lots for development.
  • Giraffes returning to the zoo in one of the parking lots (potentially Parking Lot B), perhaps as a bachelor group since those are in order for SSPs to function, as a way of complementing the existing Africa Trail.
  • BATS returning to the zoo. A bat cave in Amazonia for Jamaican fruit bats, Seba's short-tailed bats and greater bulldog bats, maybe a side tank for blind cave fish, and either Rodriguez flying foxes or straw-colored fruit bats in the Small Mammal House.
  • I'd love to see Northern Luzon cloud rats return to the Small Mammal House, maybe a standalone exhibit space for North Island brown kiwi.
  • More free ranging mammal species in Amazonia, maybe a trail embedded into the rockwork for ocelots leading to an outfoor habitat?
  • In general, most, if not all SCBI species should have some level of representation, if not being on display at the zoo. Signage indicating that they are SCBI species and highlighting the SCBI's tangible conservation efforts would absolutely help further the zoo's mission.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...ec6882-4e94-11ea-bf44-f5043eb3918a_story.html
This should be a pretty concise overview of the zoo's history with polar bears.

On a side note, I do have some ideas of my own that National could implement, if you're interested.
  • A new parking garage in order to free up some of the existing parking lots for development.
  • Giraffes returning to the zoo in one of the parking lots (potentially Parking Lot B), perhaps as a bachelor group since those are in order for SSPs to function, as a way of complementing the existing Africa Trail.
  • BATS returning to the zoo. A bat cave in Amazonia for Jamaican fruit bats, Seba's short-tailed bats and greater bulldog bats, maybe a side tank for blind cave fish, and either Rodriguez flying foxes or straw-colored fruit bats in the Small Mammal House.
  • I'd love to see Northern Luzon cloud rats return to the Small Mammal House, maybe a standalone exhibit space for North Island brown kiwi.
  • More free ranging mammal species in Amazonia, maybe a trail embedded into the rockwork for ocelots leading to an outfoor habitat?
  • In general, most, if not all SCBI species should have some level of representation, if not being on display at the zoo. Signage indicating that they are SCBI species and highlighting the SCBI's tangible conservation efforts would absolutely help further the zoo's mission.

Nice! Would you know a way to implement hippos or rhinos?
 
Nice! Would you know a way to implement hippos or rhinos?
Rhinos, there's a parcel of land behind the Asian small-clawed otter exhibit that was originally slated for them. As for hippos, I think pygmy hippos would be more iconic for the zoo - 30th President Calvin Coolidge actually received a pygmy hippopotamus named Billy from Liberia, who is actually one of the ancestors for all pygmy hippos in the US today! I think there's enough room either within the Africa Trail or adjacent to the Africa Trail to comfortably house them.
 
...but a major portion of the exhibit is focused on Central America, not native.

It focuses on Central America yes - but almost all of the species included are native. It's designed to showcase the winter habitat of our native migratory songbirds. It's not intended to be a exotic aviary.

I am not. I'm not a Flamingo expert, dyk if they need any holders? I figured they did, sorry

Andean is not a possible import, as has been stated. A bit of a pity as they are a threatened species, but it is what it is.

Amur has hundreds of holders

Might drop that number a good bit. ;)

They're on the other side of the zoo lol

Right - but as @StoppableSan pointed out, why move a perfectly functional and specially tailored complex? It doesn't make sense, especially for a zoo where any project takes a massive amount of red tape. Any major project such as this idea or several of the others you suggest takes them 2-3 times as long as other facilities. San Diego remodeled their entire Children's Zoo in the period National took to redo the bird house. With National the only reasonable alternative plans are those which build off of what is already in place or the bits of open areas - complete changeovers and shunting complexes around would take a terribly long time to accomplish.
 
It focuses on Central America yes - but almost all of the species included are native. It's designed to showcase the winter habitat of our native migratory songbirds. It's not intended to be a exotic aviary.



Andean is not a possible import, as has been stated. A bit of a pity as they are a threatened species, but it is what it is.



Might drop that number a good bit. ;)



Right - but as @StoppableSan pointed out, why move a perfectly functional and specially tailored complex? It doesn't make sense, especially for a zoo where any project takes a massive amount of red tape. Any major project such as this idea or several of the others you suggest takes them 2-3 times as long as other facilities. San Diego remodeled their entire Children's Zoo in the period National took to redo the bird house. With National the only reasonable alternative plans are those which build off of what is already in place or the bits of open areas - complete changeovers and shunting complexes around would take a terribly long time to accomplish.

All valid criticisms. Will take into account.
 
Agreeing that red tape makes renovations at the zoo really difficult, here are the biggest changes I would personally make to the zoo:

THINGS TO ADD
* Agreed with all those who talked about replacing a parking lot with a parking garage and turning another parking lot into a giraffe exhibit
* Add a cat species into/next to Amazonia
* Add a lot more trees/shade to the Great Apes yards
* Add something to that open area in Asia Trail that was initially supposed to be for rhinos. Maybe rhino, but also perhaps tapir if it's not enough space for rhinos
* Add another species next to Great Cats. There's a clearing near the habitats that's not being used. Maybe even a pygmy hippo if there's room? I can't remember how big that clearing is.

THINGS TO RE-OPEN
* Bat Cave (even if scaled down tremendously)
* Invertebrate Exhibit (even if scaled down tremendously-- maybe just focusing on octopus and cuttlefish)
* Revitalize old Smokey Bear exhibit and add black bears if possible (I don't even know what the existing space looks like)
* Bring back pandas if possible

THINGS TO REPLACE
* If pandas can't return to the zoo, renovate panda habitat into tiger exhibit and let lions take over the whole Great Cats space.
*Keep part of the kids' farm, but cut the rest of it in half to add an extra Amazonia-adjacent outdoor exhibit.
* Change half of Africa Trail into a multi-species savanna and keep the other half as a cheetah exhibit (with some visibility of the savanna)
* Many of the Small Mammals' exhibits are quite small. I think the Think Tank could still keep its focus on primate cognition while rehoming a few monkey species currently in the small mammal house, while the existing small mammals' habitats could be expanded. The Think Tank has a lot of empty space in it.
* Get rid of the little local nature exhibit near the bison exhibit and expand the space and viewing for the bison, as they always look a little cramped in there. The other little local nature exhibit near the reptile house and Great Meadow could be expanded to include more of that info.

And finally, I'd turn the Elevation Burger into a Shake Shack. ;)
 
Could the zoo possibly relocate the lions up there a fresh modern facility? When I went in 2023, they had a mediocre enclosure that looked like a small standard circle fronted by a water moat.

That would be a better fit for renovating the old Bison habitat area. I did hear from somebody that the old Bison exhibit will become the space for the new Arabian Leopard exhibit. I like the idea of changing it to a lion habitat better. That way Great Cats could be modernized into different modern habitats for both Amur and Sumatran Tigers, perhaps call it "Tiger Territory". The moats could be filled in, tall glass encircling it and new foliage and aesthetics filled in to give it a more naturalistic feel.
Moving this conversation here, that bison exhibit would be way too small for lions even if you did everything to maximize their space. The Great Cats exhibit's fine for what it is, from a husbandry/servicing perspective. Could it be better? I'm sure the zoo has plans to improve visibility and expand the animals' space - but regardless, I think the zoo should prioritize the Reptile House renovation and an eventual renovation/reconstruction of the Great Ape House and surrounding primate enclosures beforehand.
 
Back
Top