Well, any facility can say they are "working towards AZA", unless they are in one of the AZA programs to work towards that (such as the Pathway Towards Membership program) I feel it is just words that many places claim, including some supremely dodgy zoos. I am not saying the new Georgia Safari is dodgy, just that words are empty without some sort of action (which they may have, I am not familiar with them).
Atlanta Safari is nice, the location near the city is convenient and they offer a pretty standard drive through safari experience. You can read my review about it from this past July here. They don't have fallow deer, unless they have added them since that time. It is a bit strange that they don't have scads of fallow and axis deer about, they are generally really common in these parks.
That's really good to read, thanks for the information!I'll have to go check it out next time I'm down that way.
I can confirm that Georgia Safari Park is taking AZA seriously. This is not a mom-and-pop operation. The Pathway toward Membership is better suited to existing places that need to upgrade for first time accreditation or are trying to get accreditation back (Pittsburgh Zoo, Riverside Discovery center). Georgia Safari Park is still in construction phase and is leaning heavily on AZA expertise from other facilities. They are using known zoo designers. They have the veterinary side covered well, escape policies and procedures being written BEFORE they have most animals, they are going to have Ambassadors but managed in highly professional way. I'm impressed and I suspect they will be ahead of some other AZA institutions when they actually open. Of course there will be a learning curve but we all have those when we open something new. It's a good team inc on the animal side.