How to Make a Good "Australasian" themed zoo exhibit?

BenFoxster

Well-Known Member
With so many zoos modernizing and creating brand new exhibits, plus the trend to distribute species throughout the zoo via the categorical theming of continents, it makes sense for some zoos to start combining separate continents or regions to create broader exhibits, such as combining Asia and Australia to make an "Australasian" themed exhibit.

I would like to know Zoo Chat's thoughts on such a theme, as well as have some advice on how such a theme could be well executed. I would also like to know which zoos already have such a theme. I know Columbus has more of an "islands" or "Indonesian" themed exhibit with koalas, tassie devils, kangaroos, orangutans, Asian Otters, siamangs, Komodos, etc. I also know that in the most recent iteration of Elk Grove Zoo's master plan, they recently combined their previously proposed separate Asian and Australian themed exhibits to make one large "Australasian" exhibit.

How would you make a good Australasian themed exhibit, and which species would you include? Would you limit it to species found near the border between Asia and Australia, or also include species from up in Northern Asia, or down under in Southern Australia? Assuming you want the best of both worlds, I assume you would have to include a good variety.

I am currently trying to make a medium sized spec zoo that is more economical/realistic, so I am trying to make one large Australasian exhibit as opposed to two smaller Asian and Australian ones (I am also trying to make a single "Americas" exhibit as opposed to separate North and South America exhibits, which I will post a second question on). For my exhibit, I was considering including:
- Asian Elephant
- Indian Rhino
- Malayan Tiger
- Malayan Tapir
- Clouded Leopard
- Orangutan
- Siamang
- Cassowary
- Wallaby
- Tree Kangaroo
- Little Blue Penguin
- Australasian Aviary

The only other issue I foresee is that as far as making the exhibits, visitor pathway, and surrounding areas as immersive as possible, it would be far more difficult to blend the two continents together as both Asia and Australia's landscapes and architecture vary so greatly (at least based on what I've seen in movies, pictures, documentaries, etc.) that it would be difficult to create an entire exhibit that blends as one area. You could, for example, decorate the Australian exhibits differently (different foliage, Australian wooden architecture, etc.) but at that point then why not separate Australia into its own exhibit?


Considering that many zoos may not be able to afford having separate continents to
 
With so many zoos modernizing and creating brand new exhibits, plus the trend to distribute species throughout the zoo via the categorical theming of continents, it makes sense for some zoos to start combining separate continents or regions to create broader exhibits, such as combining Asia and Australia to make an "Australasian" themed exhibit.

I would like to know Zoo Chat's thoughts on such a theme, as well as have some advice on how such a theme could be well executed. I would also like to know which zoos already have such a theme. I know Columbus has more of an "islands" or "Indonesian" themed exhibit with koalas, tassie devils, kangaroos, orangutans, Asian Otters, siamangs, Komodos, etc. I also know that in the most recent iteration of Elk Grove Zoo's master plan, they recently combined their previously proposed separate Asian and Australian themed exhibits to make one large "Australasian" exhibit.

How would you make a good Australasian themed exhibit, and which species would you include? Would you limit it to species found near the border between Asia and Australia, or also include species from up in Northern Asia, or down under in Southern Australia? Assuming you want the best of both worlds, I assume you would have to include a good variety.

I am currently trying to make a medium sized spec zoo that is more economical/realistic, so I am trying to make one large Australasian exhibit as opposed to two smaller Asian and Australian ones (I am also trying to make a single "Americas" exhibit as opposed to separate North and South America exhibits, which I will post a second question on). For my exhibit, I was considering including:
- Asian Elephant
- Indian Rhino
- Malayan Tiger
- Malayan Tapir
- Clouded Leopard
- Orangutan
- Siamang
- Cassowary
- Wallaby
- Tree Kangaroo
- Little Blue Penguin
- Australasian Aviary

The only other issue I foresee is that as far as making the exhibits, visitor pathway, and surrounding areas as immersive as possible, it would be far more difficult to blend the two continents together as both Asia and Australia's landscapes and architecture vary so greatly (at least based on what I've seen in movies, pictures, documentaries, etc.) that it would be difficult to create an entire exhibit that blends as one area. You could, for example, decorate the Australian exhibits differently (different foliage, Australian wooden architecture, etc.) but at that point then why not separate Australia into its own exhibit?


Considering that many zoos may not be able to afford having separate continents to

@Chlidonias is right here. There is no greater division in the natural world than that between the fauna of Asia and Australasia, and on your list the division sits between siamang and cassowary. With respect your list is just a lumping of a number of species that have no ecological, geographical or taxonomic relationship, simply because they occur in the same quarter of the globe. It seems you have taken your lead from the likes of Columbus Zoo, which seem to have the same arrangement. I'd suggest you check out the Wallace Line.

Given the way zoos abuse zoogeographic groupings, I have increasingly become in favour of ecological habitat groupings, rainforest, temperate forest etc, although I have seen some awful examples of this as well.
 
@Chlidonias is right here. There is no greater division in the natural world than that between the fauna of Asia and Australasia, and on your list the division sits between siamang and cassowary. With respect your list is just a lumping of a number of species that have no ecological, geographical or taxonomic relationship, simply because they occur in the same quarter of the globe. It seems you have taken your lead from the likes of Columbus Zoo, which seem to have the same arrangement. I'd suggest you check out the Wallace Line.

Given the way zoos abuse zoogeographic groupings, I have increasingly become in favour of ecological habitat groupings, rainforest, temperate forest etc, although I have seen some awful examples of this as well.

Thanks, makes a lot of sense. Admittedly I'm not a fan of ecological habitat groupings since as a kid it used to confuse me into believing certain species shared the same environment (e.g., gorillas, mandrills, and okapis sharing the same regional habitat as tigers, tapir, and sloths). For years I actually believed mandrills, Malayan Tapir, and okapis were South American species, lol.
 
Thanks, makes a lot of sense. Admittedly I'm not a fan of ecological habitat groupings since as a kid it used to confuse me into believing certain species shared the same environment (e.g., gorillas, mandrills, and okapis sharing the same regional habitat as tigers, tapir, and sloths). For years I actually believed mandrills, Malayan Tapir, and okapis were South American species, lol.
That is a very interesting comment. There is little point in engaging in theming if it only leads to this sort of misunderstanding. It shows that a great deal of care and research is required to put together such groupings, and a recognition that often they will only include two or three species. For instance, from your list, an Australian tropical zone with cassowary and tree kangaroo, and an Australian woodlands aviary with wallabies.
 
That is a very interesting comment. There is little point in engaging in theming if it only leads to this sort of misunderstanding. It shows that a great deal of care and research is required to put together such groupings, and a recognition that often they will only include two or three species. For instance, from your list, an Australian tropical zone with cassowary and tree kangaroo, and an Australian woodlands aviary with wallabies.

That's actually a really great idea for a simple Australasian zone!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MRJ
Back
Top