There are far too many hybrids within the worldwide population to form a sustainable purebred population.
That generalised assumption is not supported by facts on the ground.
The European verus population was around 200-250 individuals in 1994 and at the outset it was found that a majority of the chimpanzees in European zoos (and elsewhere given the illegal animal trade) had been imported from West Africa and Sierra Leone. The program in Europe is an EEP and cooperation with other regions like AZA, JAZA, ZAA, ALPZA, PAAZA and SEAZA is encouraged.
The status of the 2014 population was like this:
P. t. verus population 233 (86.145.2) individuals potentially available for breeding
(excluding neutered animals [10.6.0] and 0.1 STLV positive)
P. t. troglodytes
P.t. troglodytes 40 (15.25.0) in the EEP plus 6 (4.2.0) in the Europe outside the EEP
effectively 35 (11.24.0) (with 4.1.0 sterile)
Hybrid/unknowns/ not yet managed and all monitored
184.293.1 (478) presently managed as non-breeding individuals in mixed groups preferably with breeding animals. The population consists of identified hybrids, individuals which have not yet been assigned to a subspecies and those belonging to P.t. schweinfurthii or P.t. ellioti.
The break down is like this:
P. t. schweinfurhtii 6 (0.6.0)
P. t. ellioti 1 (1.0)
P. t. schweinfurthii or P. t. troglodytes 6 (2.4, tested by new method)
Subspecific hybrids 228 (91.136.1)
Undetermined subspecies 237 (90.147.0, test as necessary)
The managed population stood at P.t. verus population (31,03%) and P.t. troglodytes (5,33%) overall 36,35% and adding on those identified but not yet part of the breeding program at 38,08$. Those yet to be assigned to subspecies at 31,56% ...
The monitored population of subspecific hybrids was substantial at another third (30,36%), yet those yet to be assigned to subspecies or hybrid status the last third (31,56%).
CONCLUSION:
The number of pure-bred P.t. verus in Europe was a third of the entire population and so is in fact quite substantial and the number of chimpanzees yet to be assigned was also substantial at over 30%.
The hybrid population is managed to extinction and phase out (most are contracepted or neutered). This population will die out over time as most are now in the older age classes or most of the last hybrids pre-date 2009.
Now with a third of the entire population in 2014 not yet assigned any status and a third identified as pure-bred P.t. verus it makes absolute sense given its critical status that assurance colonies of the subspecies are managed and maintained ex situ. Now the situation in Europe has seen much effort in trying to assign genetic status to its entire population.
It is something that other reasons may be well advised to follow with a tradition of chimpanzee breeding of old with a mix of known locale chimpanzees and those bred in captivity with paternity known and research tools in place to determine subspecific or hybrid status.
From all regions Africa has the biggest potential as huge numbers of confiscated chimpanzees are maintained in rehabilitation centers with chimpanzees with known origins that could be easily identified to subspecies level and are already part of the well run ex situ husbandry and rehabilitation PASA network allover the Continent. It would be not too difficult to do research the subspecies genetics for the PASA network.
For other regions: I know the Australian zoos pretty much remain unconcerned with subspecific status and happily add to the hybrid issue. What the current policy is like in the US is anybody's guess, yet it would be helpful. Indications are that in Japan an effort is being made (and where I believe recently Tokyo Tama Zoo confirmed their chimpanzees were in fact P.t. verus too and would probably be part of the managed population with EAZA/EEP.