Brookfield Zoo Brookfield Zoo News 2024

As far as lost species goes, I wouldn't be all that worried about the "saltwater fishes". As many have mentioned, the smaller exhibits for smaller species interspersed among the megafauna has always been a strong suit for Brookfield. With the new coastal area for the sealions and seabirds as well as the mangrove greenhouse for dolphins (boy that is an insanely exciting set of words) on the way, I'd be completely shocked if smaller displays for fishes and inverts are not included.

Additionally, I am extremely excited to see that The Living Coast is not only getting a spiritual successor that returns to a more focused biogeographical theme, but that the OG building also appears to be slated for an amazon basin area. With Shedd's Amazon Rising, Chicago is already a destination city for Amazonian fishes nerds like me. If Brookfield ends up with an Amazonian species list that's a third the size of Shedd's, we're all in for a real treat!

Chicago was already a huge powerhouse zoologically, it looks to me that they're heading in the direction of becoming the top city in the states as far as zoos and aquariums goes.
What's most exciting to me about Amazon Waters is that it is a MUCH larger building than Amazon Rising, and that main atrium has a lot of potential. Also, way less glare than Amazon Rising. I can easily see this as being better, and I'm really looking forward to it.
 
What's most exciting to me about Amazon Waters is that it is a MUCH larger building than Amazon Rising, and that main atrium has a lot of potential. Also, way less glare than Amazon Rising. I can easily see this as being better, and I'm really looking forward to it.
Bigger sure, but no way it'll have a higher species count.
Loving all the announced changes. I do find it somewhat humorous that they're already re-theming Great Bear Wilderness, it's not especially old. Definitely needs it though.
As they should, considering (IMO) Great Bear Wilderness is the worst part of the zoo.
 
After reading through the entire master plan I have some comments and questions.

What I like about the plan
First off I think overall the plan is amazing and more bold and ambitious than I was expecting and my expectations were high.

-I love the emphasis on immersive ecoregions and the amount of space dedicated to animals in general. I was hoping for this improvement in the plan and this is certainly achieved. I think moving away from taxonomically themed exhibits and to more natural community or ecology themed exhibits is the way to go. I also think it is great to make visitors feel as if they are immersed in the habitat of the animals they are coming to view instead of feeling like they are passing by separate animal enclosures. I like feeling like I am steeping into the animals home and I am just a small part of it. This also stimulates more natural behaviors and dynamics especially if the animals have plenty of space to roam and gives the visitor a better opportunity to understand the animals in the context of their habitat needs and role in the ecosystem. All of this should spur on more of a conservation focus and ethic in the public.

-I really like how the layout of the zoo is divided into 4 distinct areas:
1. the historic corridor
2. the immersive ecoregions
3. the wildlife discovery and children's area
4. the conservation campus
I was not expecting this nor had I thought of this thematic direction and layout but it makes a ton of sense with the zoo's mission, appealing to various needs and interest groups, and working within the already existent physical environment, exhibits, facilities, and services the zoo has.

There are a lot of other details I like about the plan and I hope it comes to fruition close to the vision described in the plan. For the most part I think the zoo has begun addressing some of its short comings and priority needs in phase 1 of the plan. They are in the process of addressing the vacuum left in animal exhibits in the south central part of the zoo after the conversion of the reptile house to a non animal building and the loss of baboon island to the Hamill Nature Plaza by having the outdoor turtle exhibit and the upcoming prairie aviary. The zoo is also addressing the need for outdoor primate space with the Tropical Forests. This is a serious deficiency that could even impact their AAZA accreditation from what I have been told. It is great this is being resolved and the new exhibit looks like it will be outstanding.

The next biggest need would be to resolve the pachyderm building and this is where phase 2 begins. I think the plan for the renovation and reuse of the pachyderm building as a viewing gallery is perfect and the zoo's plan for the east African forest to the south and savanna to the north is great. It makes perfect sense that if this is to be done that Australia would have to be redone almost simultaneously. It also makes sense to bring the elephants and rhino exhibits online and a new lion exhibit all building up to the zoo's centennial in 2034. All this seems well thought out and makes perfect sense to me. Where I begin to question things is after this...

What concerns me about the plan
-I wonder why redoing the north entry gate, walkway and plaza and building the new sea lion and penguin habitats is taking priority over resolving the old bear grottos? I don't dislike anything about the actual plans and I think expanding the Wild Encounters into the bear grottos and the species to be exhibited there are all great but it is the phasing I question. It seems much less complicated to execute the plan for the old bear grottos than to redo the north entrance and build the sea lion and penguin habitats especially since their habitats are already in good shape. The old bear grottos however are just a gapping void and blemish currently and according to the master plan will remain so for over another decade. There must be some logic behind this decision but what it is eludes me.

I think it makes sense to build the new lion habitat in phase 2 as planed, relocate the sloth bears to the bear grottos and incorporate that with Wild Encounters also in phase 2. Then use the big cat grottos for just the Amur tiger, leopard, and snow leopard until their new exhibits are complete in phase 3. Obviously the sea lion habitat has to be done before the new dolphin mangrove and the new penguin exhibit completed before the Living Coast is transformed into an Amazon exhibit. So the new sea lion and penguin exhibits should be done at the end of phase 2 or beginning of phase 3 but after the bear grottos.

-I would like to see a little more emphasis placed on Asia, the largest and most diverse continent. The space given to Asia is too small at 3.6 acres not counting some additional areas like the Asia area at Tropical Forests, Clouded Leopards Forest, and the Asian species that will be in the old bear grottos compared to over 25 acres given to Africa. South America gets over 5.2 acres, North America over 16.4 ac, and even Australia gets 3.5 ac. I know I'm biased but would love to see an amazing Amur tiger and leopard habitat complete with some representative prey species and innovative ways to stimulate natural hunting behaviors. This could still happen as the plans evolve more and become more flushed out for phase 3.

General comments and questions
-I'm surprised how much the zoo is actually planning on building and developing to the west, especially west of Salt Creek. Some of this is in the floodway so compensatory storage and protection for the animals and facilities will need to be taken into account. This certainly does greatly expand the footprint of space the zoo has for active use and takes advantage of natural features the zoo has.

-I'm thinking the $500 million is just for phase 2. Tropical Forest alone cost $66 million. I can't imagine all of this being $500 million. Just for the elephants alone will probably be close to $200 million.

-What will happen to the big cat grottos? I hope they still are used for animal exhibits in some fashion and not just swallowed up by the amphitheater. Outdoor enclosures for the clouded leopards and ocelots for example would be great.

-What is the plan for elephants, rhinos, hippos, Nile crocodiles, etc. in the winter and bad weather and viewing them?

- Will dolphins be in both the Seven Seas and new mangrove exhibit? Will it be the same dolphins in both? If so how will they move back and forth?

Overall I am really excited about this bold visionary plan and an excited to experience the next decade or two and the transformation of Brookfield Zoo Chicago.
 
The renderings for the Nile hippopotamus exhibit look horrible. There will be a serious lack of grazing space and it will be impossible to hold an appropriately-sized group.

Are the plans calling for a bachelor group of elephants, a matrilineal herd, or both?

Everyone seems to be very excited about Tropic World. I'm expecting I will be very disappointed, even though it will definitely be an improvement for the apes. The building itself is going to be even more understocked than it already is and the focus is clearly geared toward primates. I see no reason why a variety of large, terrestrial mammals can't be moved for the exhibit. For example, the Brazilian tapirs could make use of the outdoor South American primates enclosure and the indoor South America room.

I agree with @birdsandbats that the Amazon River exhibit is going to be underwhelming with the Shedd Aquarium's Amazon Rising close by.
 
Do you know what the issues are with the interior of the pachyderm house? I haven’t seen anything said and while it feels old, it was renovated not all that long ago to allow guests to walk through the entirety of the center section, so I’ve been surprised it seems closed indefinitely despite those changes.
Mainly structural issues; the building is just old and maintaining it has eaten up a lot of capital investment in recent years. Most of the inhabitants don't have proper off-show areas either.
Somewhat relatedly, do you read the Winter Zoo plan as indicating that elephants will be off exhibit during the winter? Either way, their housing looks smaller than the current pachyderm house, which is a bit concerning in a climate where they could spend nearly half the year mostly indoors.
I wouldn't read too much into that. The other African houses aren't included on that map either, probably because they are slightly out of the way compared to the main trail. It wouldn't make much sense to have a publicly viewable elephant barn if you didn't allow people in during the winter. :p While the building itself is smaller, the space allocated to elephants will be much greater and there will be two separate barns. I also imagine the final design for the area will include a larger barn in some capacity.
-What will happen to the big cat grottos? I hope they still are used for animal exhibits in some fashion and not just swallowed up by the amphitheater. Outdoor enclosures for the clouded leopards and ocelots for example would be great.
The amphitheater will extend into the space. Outdoor Fragile Kingdom exhibits would be great, but having them in such close proximity to a loud amphitheater space would not be conducive to welfare.
-What is the plan for elephants, rhinos, hippos, Nile crocodiles, etc. in the winter and bad weather and viewing them?
The elephant will have a publicly viewable barn. While not explicitly mentioned, there is a possibility the hippos and crocodiles will have indoor exhibits within the revamped pachyderm house.
- Will dolphins be in both the Seven Seas and new mangrove exhibit? Will it be the same dolphins in both? If so how will they move back and forth?
Actually a very good question, perhaps the outdoor pools will connect the two? It isn't mentioned anywhere and I do hope the dolphins will get to choose where to spend time between the two buildings.
The renderings for the Nile hippopotamus exhibit look horrible. There will be a serious lack of grazing space and it will be impossible to hold an appropriately-sized group.
It is just a rendering, not a final design or to-scale blueprint as other members have said. The final space will likely have a larger land area.
Are the plans calling for a bachelor group of elephants, a matrilineal herd, or both?
I believe I read somewhere there will be capacity for two elephant herds, presumably both bulls and a breeding herd.
Everyone seems to be very excited about Tropic World. I'm expecting I will be very disappointed, even though it will definitely be an improvement for the apes. The building itself is going to be even more understocked than it already is and the focus is clearly geared toward primates. I see no reason why a variety of large, terrestrial mammals can't be moved for the exhibit. For example, the Brazilian tapirs could make use of the outdoor South American primates enclosure and the indoor South America room.
It really won't be all that different. Additional African monkeys will replace the gorillas and three groups of orangutans will rotate between the indoor and outdoor exhibits, so there will always be at least one indoors. There's also a possibility some of the monkeys will split time between the indoor and outdoor exhibits, as I often only see one or two species out together at a time. The zoo is moving away from exhibiting large terrestrial mammals indoors year-round and bringing them back to the building would be a step backward husbandry wise -- it wouldn't surprise me if the anteater moves to the Pantanal/Atlantic Forest exhibit in the future.
I agree with @birdsandbats that the Amazon River exhibit is going to be underwhelming with the Shedd Aquarium's Amazon Rising close by.
It'll definitely be tough to beat, but we don't even know the details of what this exhibit will look like or what it will include so is it really fair to judge? :p
 
The elephant will have a publicly viewable barn. While not explicitly mentioned, there is a possibility the hippos and crocodiles will have indoor exhibits within the revamped pachyderm house.

I'm not doubting you I just haven't seen or heard any information about an indoor publicly viewable barn for the elephants or other species mentioned. Where did you find this info?
 
I'm not doubting you I just haven't seen or heard any information about an indoor publicly viewable barn for the elephants or other species mentioned. Where did you find this info?
If you look at the Gateway to Africa site plan, you can see a large building to the right of elephant/rhino habitat A. There’s a guest path that leads through it.

IMG_8093.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8093.jpeg
    IMG_8093.jpeg
    99.7 KB · Views: 100
Is anyone else concluding the proposals for Andean flamingos, sun bears, and African forest buffalo are only there for the master plan itself seem more creative, and that no actual effort will be made to acquire them? Out of those three, sun bears would be easiest to obtain. Malayan sun bears and African forest buffalo are both somewhat common in Europe, but far more regulations for importing ungulates exist compared to carnivores. Getting Andean flamingos would be similarly difficult to getting African forest buffalo, albeit for different reasons.

It is just a rendering, not a final design or to-scale blueprint
Hence why I referred to it as the renderings for the Nile Hippopotamus exhibit.

The final space will likely have a larger land area.
I hope to be pleasantly surprised by a good hippopotamus exhibit, but I'm not holding my breath. There is no real way of knowing the probability of the exhibit having an adequate land area, so we will just have to wait and see.

I believe I read somewhere there will be capacity for two elephant herds, presumably both bulls and a breeding herd.
Is more information publicly available other than what is included in the presentation? I wasn't sure based off of that presentation because the rendering depicts a matrilineal herd, but the caption describes a scene specifically with a bull.
 
That's so disappointing. :(
Don't get me wrong- I'd love to be proven wrong, but this is just my best guess based on the AZA's SAFE and the species readily available in zoos. I'd especially love to be wrong since flamingos are the perfect animals for a zoo to import a rare species- as given their colonial nature it takes a lot fewer institutions to have a successful, sustainable captive population than it would for a solitary or pair-living species.
 
I'm pretty sure while the new outdoor stuff is being worked on, the zoo will also be renovating indoor sections in those areas, seems a little silly to not work on Habitat Africa: The Savannah while they have that whole space under work, same for Australia, feel Tropic World will be getting an indoor renovation soon enough too, probably during a summer after Tropical Forests is done
Really hoping the Asian Section ends up including Giant Salamanders, they were in the Swamp for a bit so I'd love to see them back, I'm sure we may see some more Asian stuff come in as time goes on
Feel we also got a few empty spots on the plan that could get exhibits at some point too
 
I'm pretty sure while the new outdoor stuff is being worked on, the zoo will also be renovating indoor sections in those areas, seems a little silly to not work on Habitat Africa: The Savannah while they have that whole space under work, same for Australia, feel Tropic World will be getting an indoor renovation soon enough too, probably during a summer after Tropical Forests is done
Really hoping the Asian Section ends up including Giant Salamanders, they were in the Swamp for a bit so I'd love to see them back, I'm sure we may see some more Asian stuff come in as time goes on
Feel we also got a few empty spots on the plan that could get exhibits at some point too
I may be wrong but I think the zoo still has the salamanders.
 
The zoo has received a pair of crested capuchins and an additional tufted capuchin, both of which are now on-exhibit in Tropic World. The zoo is now one of only three or four holders of crested capuchin in North America and the only one in the midwest.

x.com
I'm wondering because of the announcement's wording if Zephyr, the other tufted capuchin from the Ochsner Park Zoo, passed away.
 
Lot’s of skepticism on relocating penguins to the front. Denver just did this and it’s incredibly smart, especially for what the zoo is going for - “Connect. Care. Conserve.”

In most job interviews for keeper positions, they’ll ask, “if you were to start a zoo tomorrow, what three animals would you start with?” Penguins should always be on that list.

Incredibly charismatic and something almost every guest is going to look out for on their visit. Putting them by the gate starts the visit off on the right foot with a positive experience and connection. Outdoor penguin exhibits at the entrance have been becoming more of the norm (already mentioned Denver plus Akron and Cheyenne). That’s your “connect.”

Building a new exhibit also gives the zoo the opportunity to create a better encounter space. You have a better chance of filling that encounter space if it’s the first thing people are upsold at the start of the day, and more of the morning slots will be full when the afternoons are already sold out from people who pre-booked. That’s your “care.”

Finally, penguins have some of the easiest conservation messaging. What can people do right now to help? Shop sustainable fish. Donate. SANCCOB (for African penguins of course) or whatever organization the zoo supports/donates. Brookfield also does plenty of their own field work with Humboldt’s that they can reference. That’s your “conserve.”

I love The Living Coast. I remember its opening year and its true glory days with the water wall and moon jellies in the first large tank. It’s not getting back to that. I’m glad there’s an emphasis on giving animals outdoor access and that should include the penguins. The Living Coast will be a tough loss for my nostalgia, but it’s a no-brainer for a zoo that only has a carousel and a gift shop at the entrance.
 
Back
Top