I don't think the building will be kept. I'm disappointed that a lot of the fish will be leaving the zoo.
A real shame to wipe another part of the zoo’s history away.
Listed on ZTL as new arrivals at Chester are two new lizard species and a new subspecies.
Frog-eyed Sand Gecko (Teratoscincus keyerrlingii)
Leptein's Spiny-tailed Lizard (Uromastyx aegyptia leptienii)
Middle Eastern Short-fingered Gecko (Stenodactylus doriae)
The Sailfin Lizard is now listed as Sulawesi Salifin Lizard (Hydrosaurus doriae)
Any idea which chimps was born to babu and Meg and how many chimps they have had all together ?The first was a female named Phyllis who arrived in 1942. She passed in 1945. Another female, Topsy, arrived in 1948 before passing in 1958.
In 1950 the first so called 'group' arrived; males, Elmer, Simon and Solomon and females, Meg and Babu. The first offspring born at Chester in 1956 were from those two females.
Listed on ZTL as new arrivals at Chester are two new lizard species and a new subspecies.
Frog-eyed Sand Gecko (Teratoscincus keyserlingii)
Leptein's Spiny-tailed Lizard (Uromastyx aegyptia leptienii)
Middle Eastern Short-fingered Gecko (Stenodactylus doriae)
As usual, some interesting new species (hopefully to come on show!).These all came from the Sharjah Breeding Centre For Endangered Arabian Wildlife, UAE.
Babu had the following surviving offspring:Any idea which chimps was born to babu and Meg and how many chimps they have had all together ?
As usual, some interesting new species (hopefully to come on show!).
I don't think the building will be kept. I'm disappointed that a lot of the fish will be leaving the zoo.
They were discontinued because of doubts about their subspecies ancestry. I would suggest a generic population is better than none…..Please also note: Chester Zoo with a significant population of Yemen origins' Arabian gazelle and a successful program over decennia ultimately allowed that population to go on phase out and eventually die out (BIAZA did have a specific ex situ conservation breeding program for this species) completely.
Interesting how standalone aquariums seem to be increasingly rather taboo for modern zoos, with the same reasoning for their removal (cost,structural). A similar, rather more extreme, example being London
Interesting how standalone aquariums seem to be increasingly rather taboo for modern zoos, with the same reasoning for their removal (cost,structural). A similar, rather more extreme, example being London
Yes, I am / was well aware of this conviction on the part of zoo animal management.They were discontinued because of doubts about their subspecies ancestry. I would suggest a generic population is better than none…..
They were discontinued because of doubts about their subspecies ancestry. I would suggest a generic population is better than none…..
I think that the original group was divided between Chester and Dudley, I can remember seeing two old animals at Dudley early. 1990sThe irony being that, as far as I know, it was eventually determined that a) Arabian Gazelle was indeed a valid taxon and b) the captive population had been pure.
Yes, I can personally attest to this as I investigated with a geneticist working at the time in the UK on the Arabian gazelle species that this is and was the case. It continues to boggle my mind and absolutely .... speechless how anyone may have missed vital information. That vital information was all in the erstwhile BIAZA studbook.The irony being that, as far as I know, it was eventually determined that a) Arabian Gazelle was indeed a valid taxon and b) the captive population had been pure.