Philadelphia Area Trip

ConcernedThirdParty

Well-Known Member
I just found out that I nee to go to Philadelphia this week to help a relative with a complicated move. I will be flying out a few days early to have a few days to explore the city since I have never been to the area before.

My two definite destinations are the Philadelphia Zoo and the Adventure Aquarium across the river in New Jersey. I expect to easily make it to the Elmwood Park Zoo too.

The Brandywine Zoo across the border in Delaware is not far but at only 5 acres I’m not sure it is worth the trip even with a few rare mammal species.

I’m also considering the New Jersey State Museum, Penn Museum, and will probably stop by the Independence National Historical Park at least briefly.

Any thoughts on these places or other decent attractions in the area, as well as general info on traveling in the area would be much appreciated.

Many of these places seem to require advanced booking so I know I am short on time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVM
Other attractions you might consider depending on your interests are the Academy of Natural Sciences (oldest natural history museum in the US) or Longwood Gardens (perhaps the premier botanical garden in the US with an immense conservatory). There are Revolutionary War sites throughout the area but in a short visit I'd just stick with Independence National Historic Park and pair that with a wander around Center City. I personally wouldn't bother with Brandywine Zoo but if you do go Longwood Gardens is in the vicinity. If you're interested in wildlife viewing an hour drive east gets you to coastal marsh and pine barrens habitats in S. New Jersey with good birding and herping. It's a bit farther drive to the north or west to get to Appalachian habitats.
 
If you're already planning Philadelphia Zoo and Adventure Aquarium and want to add another couple of activities, I would suggest purchasing a Philadelphia CityPass to save money.
Philadelphia CityPASS

I actually did this a little while back and visited the zoo and aquarium and also Museum of the American Revolution and Eastern State Penitentiary which were both enjoyable non-zoo activities. I've visited Franklin Institute in the past but I was much younger and don't remember much about it, probably more of a place for kids. Academy of Natural Sciences has a ZooChat gallery and they seem to have a nice taxidermy collection.
 
Thanks for the tips. The Academy of Natural Sciences definitely sounds like it is worth a trip. I was already considering a CityPass and will probably go with that.
I will post updates as things happen.
 
I just got back from my trip. I made it to the Philadelphia and Elmwood Park Zoos, the Adventure Aquarium, and the Academy of Natural Sciences which I will write my analyses of and post here in the coming days. Reciprocal AZA Membership admission pricing at the Elmwood and Philadelphia Zoos made the City Pass more expensive so I ended up skipping it. If anyone has a membership to an AZA facility, I strongly recommend checking the reciprocity list before travelling.
 
Adventure Aquarium Analysis Part 1

This was my first time at the Adventure Aquarium. This is one of the larger public aquariums I have been to, other than the Shedd which I would consider my “Home” Aquarium.

As previously reported, signage is definitely lacking here so I may fill in information if necessary. Their font choices are questionable and often difficult to decipher. Latin names are present on most of the signs, but the “common” names used often seem to be of their own invention. They often have a descriptive blurb about the species like “Fast Swimmer” where the common name would normally be on a sign with the common name in smaller font below. For this reason, I will not be attempting a full species list. @Astrotom3000 Did one in April that was better than anything I might come up with now.

Also, I call this an analysis not a review because I try to take a more technical approach and also will only cover things I think are interesting rather than try to assign a value to the facility as a whole. There will be areas I just don’t talk about because I don’t have any meaningful commentary on them.

The first exhibit you are likely to see in here is the Piranha Falls. I think this is ironic as this one tank manages to exemplify the pros and cons of the entire facility. It is a reasonably sized tank for larger amazonian fish. I would guess maybe 20,000 gallons in volume. The tank is munch narrower at the bottom and this is done with a series of 1-3 foot vertical drop offs in the concrete bottom for a maximum depth I would estimate at 8-10 feet. The viewing window only while about 20 feet long only exposes the top 3 feet of the tank. This which makes actually viewing the bottom, of the tank impossible.

The main inhabitants of this exhibit are of course Red-Bellied Piranhas (Pygocentrus nattereri). Their website claims over 100 are present. I’m not sure it is actually that many but there are certainly several dozen. About a dozen species were listed on the signs but the only other ones visible were a couple Black Pacu / Tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum), a handful of Banded Leporinus (Leporinus fasciatus) and one very bored looking Ocellate Stingray (Potamotrygon motoro) that didn’t move from the top of one of the drop-off ledges the whole time I was there (I made 2 passes through the aquarium over about four hours).

The top of the tank is open air reaching about 30 feet to the ceiling. The background is a rock wall with a combination of real and fake plants creating a nice jungle effect. The lighting and soundtrack changes throughout the day to simulate changing weather. While this is a nice backdrop it really just feels like wasted space. If this area were to be sealed in with acrylic or netting, it would make a perfect environment for a variety of reptile or bird species many of which are kept in less-than-ideal environments elsewhere in the facility. Indeed, immediately behind you when viewing the falls is a rotational parrot exhibit that looked like it belonged in a Rainforest Café not an AZA accredited institution.

Proceeding down the hall are some turtle tanks. The Diamond Back Terrapin and Snake-Neck Turtle tanks are adequate but not exceptional. The Common Snapping Turtle tank was a little on the small side but probably would have been fine if someone hadn’t seen fit to add a massive fake tree stump the negated most of the usable swimming area for a rather large member of this already large and active species. This theme of one or two poor decisions that go uncorrected and end up ruining an otherwise decent exhibit repeats itself in other parts of the aquarium. Also down this way is a lonely kookaburra; a group of these social birds would be another great option for the area above the Piranha Falls.

Before the next piece, for the record, I have only ever seen two penguin exhibits (for any species of penguin) that I thought seemed to have sufficient size. The African Penguins in San Diego’s Africa Rocks and the Humbolt Penguins at the Philadelphia Zoo (more on those in an upcoming post) both have wide and deep pools and a decently sized land area.

The only other place I have seen Blue Penguins is at the Birch Aquarium in San Diego. That one seemed a little on the small side but was massive compared to this one. Even for the tiniest of the penguins, three feet of water depth just seems lazy. That said the penguins did seem happy and well looked after. A few were in molt and looking shaggy but that’s just part of life for penguins.

I lucked out and arrived just as they started feeding which was a great experience. The way they feed is first each penguin gets a single fish with an added vitamin that is specific to the individual (they check the bird’s bands before adding it). Afterwards, everyone is allowed to return and get the rest of their meal. Most of the penguins understand the system and are very cooperative, going to wait at the back until the next stage after getting their vitamin. There are a couple of individuals that like try to steal the other’s vitamins and generally cause chaos throughout the process though. Overall, this was a very engaging and amusing experience.

The African Penguin exhibit outside was closed for maintenance, with the animals out of sight but from what I could tell, the setup looked fairly average for the species.

Next is the Pirates Passage. This area is the most like a traditional aquarium. While I’m not too fond of this type of theming, families and kids tend to love it, so I get it. Here, a variety of colorful and interesting tropical saltwater fish reside in species appropriate habitats. There is a difference between husbandry and exhibitry however. The walkway is very dimly lit. While this is a common method to reduce in-habitat lighting needs and help to hide the visitors from the animals, even with this the habitats are too poorly lit for proper viewing (This isn’t Into the Deep in Monterrey where species are light sensitive). As a result, the whole hallway just feels dreary.

In keeping with the pirate theme, the sound track is of a continuously creaking wooden ship. This would be fine but the volume was set way too loud. Not the “it hurts my ears” kind of too loud but instead the “speakers are turned up too high and are starting to distort” kind of too loud. In keeping with our theme of simple but critical fixes, if they would fix the sound system and improve the lighting, this would probably be a really nice exhibit.

This is getting too long for a single post so part 2 will follow shortly.​
 
Last edited:
Adventure Aquarium Analysis Part 2
The Ocean Realm tank is truly incredible. At 760,000 gallons it is massive. The placement and design of the viewing areas for the exhibit are very well done. Just to the side of the main tank is an unusual mixed species display of Moon Jellies (Aurelia aurita) and Plastic Bags (Petroleus turtlkilicus) (I didn’t know those were animals but I guess you learn something new every day).

Despite being among the oldest exhibits here it is probably the best one. I was very sad that Anchor the Great Hammerhead had died and just a little over a week before my visit. The Sea Turtles are definitely the stars of the show here now. While I was going through 6 or so divers were scattered through the tank scrubbing algae from the fake corals and rocks with brushes. The turtles did not like this. Every 30 seconds or so, one of turtles (weighing several hundred pounds) would headbutt a diver and demand that they stop working and brush them instead. A few seconds of chin and shell scratches would deter them for about minute before they would return for more. I was hilarious and adorably reminiscent of a cat sitting on the keyboard to demand attention.

That said, there are issues here too. I’m reminded of the show Tanked where every time someone asks for a shark tank, they say it needs to be big and it needs to be round. Otherwise, the sharks will bump their noses while swimming. While the AA certainly has the size down, they really messed up on the shape. At this scale true roundness is unnecessary, (many flat sides with very slight angles are usually good enough). Ocean Realm however, is essentially a square but with a few extra sharp angled protrusions added for good measure.

The only sharks visible today were the Silky Sharks (Carcharhinus falciformi) and both of the ones I saw had visible marks on their snouts from crashing into things. Even with some very interesting inhabitants it does have a kind of empty feeling and seems understocked. I wonder if now that its largest inhabitant has passed, they will start adding sharks of more reasonable sizes.

Despite its issues though, I think this one of the best shark tanks I have seen and has real potential to be even better.

Jumping over to the other massive shark tank, at over 500,000 gallons, the Shark Bridge / Shark Tunnel has a lot of the same pros and cons as Ocean Realm. The shape of the tank is bizarre and it seems to affect the health of the more sensitive shark species.

The Sand Tiger / Gray Nurse Sharks (Carcharias taurus) are the definitive stars of the show here. I’m not sure why these do so well in captivity but they show none of the signs of stress that some of the smaller species do. These things are an incredible sight to see. The tend to congregate in the deepest area near the largest viewing window which makes for and eerie but amazing experience.

The tunnel is probably the least interesting part of the exhibit since its placement near the top and way to the side means that sharks tend to avoid it. ALL of the smaller fish seem to hang out here though (probably because the sharks avoid it).

The Shark Bridge is by far the most unique part of this exhibit. Watching the Sand Tigers lurk below with just a couple layers of mesh keeping you dry is quite the experience. Once again however, I sense a lack of foresight here. The walkable porting is about 12 inches wide and winds back and forth for a few dozen feet over the water. For this reason, small children and the physically impaired cannot go on the bridge. They had to add a layer of finer mesh after the fact because people were dropping things into the water. I just wonder if an acrylic bottomed viewing platform would have been a better investment.

As noted by @Astrotom3000 , The Grotto and Creature Feature are decent looking and interesting despite being geared more towards children. This is probably the best display of smaller fish in the whole facility and contains a number of the most popular species like Clowns, Tangs, and Triggers. I have no other notes to add here really.

This is the end of part 2 of my analysis. I will post Parts 3 and 4 in the coming days. Those will cover Frogs: Nature’s Messengers and Hippo Haven as this has already gotten very long and I expect those parts to be controversial.​
 
Last edited:
one very bored looking Ocellate Stingray (Potamotrygon motoro) that didn’t move from the top of one of the drop-off ledges the whole time I was there (I made 2 passes through the aquarium over about four hours).
Question: How do you determine that a stingray "looks bored"? Not saying that stingrays, or any animals, can't experience boredom, but without any quantifiable data to back it up this inference seems like a stretch. To the best of my knowledge, inactivity is a fairly natural component of a stingray's behavioral repertoire.
 
I actually loved that the aquarium put plastic bags in the same tank with the jellies. People always talk about how sea turtles can eat plastic bags thinking they are jellyfish, but when I saw the two floating in water together it gave me a whole new level of appreciation for how similar looking they are.
 
Question: How do you determine that a stingray "looks bored"? Not saying that stingrays, or any animals, can't experience boredom, but without any quantifiable data to back it up this inference seems like a stretch. To the best of my knowledge, inactivity is a fairly natural component of a stingray's behavioral repertoire.

I said it looked bored because that was the best adjective I could come up with not that it was actually bored (though it could have been). Perhaps that was too generous and I should have said sad instead.

Generally Amazonian Rays are kept in wide open tanks with sandy bottoms, not a series of not a series of sharp vertical drops leading to narrow horizontal ledges without enough gravel to fully cover the concrete surfaces.

In more ideal conditions, rays will spend much of their time actively cruising along the bottom. This is a natural foraging behavior; their senses are similar to sharks and their food (mostly mollusks and crustaceans) would live in the sand in nature. When they do stop, they bury themselves in the sand as a defense mechanism.

I actually loved that the aquarium put plastic bags in the same tank with the jellies. People always talk about how sea turtles can eat plastic bags thinking they are jellyfish, but when I saw the two floating in water together it gave me a whole new level of appreciation for how similar looking they are.

Agreed. This wasn’t meant as a criticism, I was just pointing out the novelty of it (the dog Latin was mine not theirs). I have seen the bags used as filler in tanks that used to hold jellies, but this was definitely a more deliberate and meaningful take.
 
Back
Top