Zoochat (Tea)Cup 2025

TeaLovingDave

Moderator
Staff member
15+ year member
Introduction

It is now just over four years since the last Zoochat Cup - a smaller scale affair initially planned by @CGSwans but eventually coordinated and operated by myself, focusing purely on Great Britain and Ireland and intended to test out some new mechanics for the Zoochat Cup concept - concluded in December 2020, and just shy of five years since the last full-scale Cup concluded in February 2020. The lack of any subsequent threads has been due, in large part, to both myself and CGSwans having found the pandemic years rather difficult when it comes to mental and physical energy, and hence the enthusiasm required to handle a project of this nature with the devotion and care which it would require.

However, as some reading this post may know, in early 2024 I became one of the custodians of the vast archive belonging to the Bartlett Society (an organisation focusing on the preservation of zoo history) and have been undertaking the sizeable task of cataloguing and sorting the archive on behalf of the Society ever since. A very welcome side-effect of this endeavour is that over the course of the past year, I have found my mental energy and enthusiasm for long-term projects has been gradually returning; as such, for a while now I have been considering the feasibility of resuming the Zoochat Cup, with the general hope of sparking the sort of in-depth discussion and debates which previous iterations encouraged, and which led to a massive increase in community morale and engagement.

By the start of December 2024, I had decided that the task of reviving the Zoochat Cup *was* one which I had both the enthusiasm and mental energy to undertake, and - after getting the blessing and go-ahead from @CGSwans - I have spent the last few weeks planning and working out the fine details :)

Focus and structure

To begin with, the 2025 Cup will focus on European collections only, with a similar structure to that devised by CGSwans for the two incarnations of the 2020 UK/Ireland Cup but on a larger scale; four initial divisions of six zoological collections each, where each zoo will play each other once. After this point, the top three collections in each division will move forward into a pair of semi-final divisions; within these divisions, each trio of collections will play only the three qualifiers from the other half of the draw and carry over the relevant results from their first-round matches with one another. The champion of each semi-final division will then finally go forward to the finals (the precise format of which I intend to reveal later) in order to face their counterpart and determine the final winner.

If anyone is confused about the above, I've quoted the full explanation of the original match structure concept from the 2020 threads below, although note that the collections cited do not indicate anything about the competitors this time round:

They will not play twice against the other qualifiers from their own division. Instead, they will carry the results from their matches against the other qualifiers forward. For instance, take the following scenario of results from a division:

Cotswold 4-1, 60%
Twycross 3-2, 55%
London 3-2, 52%
Jersey 2-3, 48%
Paignton 2-3 45%
Chester 1-4, 40%

.....

The three qualifying zoos are Cotswold, Twycross and London. Cotswold has topped the group, which is great. Well done Cotswold. But when we look at the results between those three zoos, we see that they didn’t quite dominate against the other qualifiers. The three matches between them were as follows:

Twycross 60 d. London 40
Cotswold 55 d London 45
Twycross 70 d Cotswold 30

While Cotswold topped the group, it’s actually now behind Twycross as it enters the second round, because Twycross performed best against the other qualifiers. The standings that the three zoos take with them are as follows:

Twycross 2-0, 65%
Cotswold 1-1, 44.5%
London 0-2, 42.5%

Once each of these zoos has played against the three qualifiers from the other division (let’s say Paignton, Edinburgh and Bristol. It doesn’t matter), the leading zoo wins the Cup. This is a fair system, because it ensures that in the second and final round, the six zoos each play each other once, but it avoids running additional matches between zoos that have already faced each other.

If all goes well and there is sufficient continued interest, enthusiasm and participation from the forum community for the task to feel worthwhile, I do have hopes to extend the Cup beyond Europe.... but we will focus on the task immediately ahead of us for the foreseeable!

Voting format

The issue of how best to strike a balance between allowing a fine degree of subtlety in voting and avoiding excessive complexity has been a recurrent issue in previous iterations of the Zoochat Cup; at various points CGSwans and/or myself have attempted a 3-vote system, a 3-vote system with optional bonus points, and a 5-vote system. I've given a lot of consideration to this point, and I have decided that we will once again be playing with a 5-vote system; it will be impossible to vote for a perfect tie, but it will allow more subtle judgements to be made and hopefully reflect a close-run match a lot more accurately.

In order to prevent the potential imbalance that overtly-biased votes represent, this all comes with one important caveat: if one gives a 5-0 vote, you MUST provide appropriate justification for this in-thread. Any such votes which are either unexplained, or break the rules of fair play in some fashion, will be void.

The other key point which should be made here is that you don’t need to have visited a zoo to vote - but naturally, if you *have* visited a collection and your vote is based on this experience, sharing your knowledge and insight within the relevant thread will be incredibly valuable, and provide a jumping-off point for those individuals who lack your experience to make their own minds up on the matter! As noted above, I very much hope that this thread and the various matches that will follow will form the hub of discussion, debate and above all the sharing of knowledge.

Participants

When drawing up a shortlist of zoological collections to take part in the Zoochat Cup, I was influenced by several considerations; naturally, I knew that I wanted to include a wide range of collections commonly held by members of this forum to be amongst the very best that Europe has to offer, but equally I also wanted to represent the diversity in history, design philosophy and culture which can be found throughout the zoological collections of the continent, and as such consciously limited the number of German collections I included. Perhaps just as importantly, my decision to limit the overall field to a total of 24 collections required some fairly brutal decisions - and I do not doubt that some of the omissions will be hotly contested!

One way in which I was able to somewhat mitigate this limitation is that I have once again incorporated the mechanic which @CGSwans devised for the last UK Cup regarding collections which fall under the aegis of a larger zoological organisation alongside a sister collection - this has allowed me to include a few extra collections which I felt needed to be included, although it should be noted that I have deliberately kept one such pair separate to prevent the risk of undue dominance in the overall competition.

As such the final shortlist of 24 competitors stands as follows:

  • Zoo Berlin
  • Tierpark Berlin
  • Leipzig
  • Cologne
  • Frankfurt
  • Wilhelma (Stuttgart)
  • Wroclaw
  • Zurich
  • Tiergarten Schoenbrunn (Vienna)
  • Zagreb
  • Copenhagen
  • Budapest
  • Burgers' Zoo (Arnhem)
  • Artis (Amsterdam)
  • Paris Zoo and Menagerie des Plantes
  • ZooParc Beauval
  • Prague
  • Plzen and Akva-Terra
  • Pairi Daiza
  • Antwerp Zoo and Planckendael
  • Chester
  • London and Whipsnade
  • Nuremburg
  • Basel

The overall split of zoological collections across the four initial divisions will be randomised, but in order to keep things interesting and avoid the risk of one single division being overly-loaded with stronger competitors, I have elected to select four seeds which will each be specifically-placed within a different league; these are shown in bold above.

Match Categories

As with previous iterations of the Zoochat Cup, the categories used within the competition matches will be randomly assigned, and will fall under three overall "genres" - taxonomic, geographic, and biome. I'll keep the precise categories a surprise for now, although those of you who recall previous competitions will doubtless be able to predict some/all of them!

---

My plan is to announce the divisional splits tomorrow, with the first two matches following in the evening. Until then, let me know if there is anything further that requires clarification - this *is* the longest post I have written for a long time, so I might well have missed something or other!

Finally, I hope you all enjoy the matches to come :)
 
Introduction

It is now just over four years since the last Zoochat Cup - a smaller scale affair initially planned by @CGSwans but eventually coordinated and operated by myself, focusing purely on Great Britain and Ireland and intended to test out some new mechanics for the Zoochat Cup concept - concluded in December 2020, and just shy of five years since the last full-scale Cup concluded in February 2020. The lack of any subsequent threads has been due, in large part, to both myself and CGSwans having found the pandemic years rather difficult when it comes to mental and physical energy, and hence the enthusiasm required to handle a project of this nature with the devotion and care which it would require.

However, as some reading this post may know, in early 2024 I became one of the custodians of the vast archive belonging to the Bartlett Society (an organisation focusing on the preservation of zoo history) and have been undertaking the sizeable task of cataloguing and sorting the archive on behalf of the Society ever since. A very welcome side-effect of this endeavour is that over the course of the past year, I have found my mental energy and enthusiasm for long-term projects has been gradually returning; as such, for a while now I have been considering the feasibility of resuming the Zoochat Cup, with the general hope of sparking the sort of in-depth discussion and debates which previous iterations encouraged, and which led to a massive increase in community morale and engagement.

By the start of December 2024, I had decided that the task of reviving the Zoochat Cup *was* one which I had both the enthusiasm and mental energy to undertake, and - after getting the blessing and go-ahead from @CGSwans - I have spent the last few weeks planning and working out the fine details :)

Focus and structure

To begin with, the 2025 Cup will focus on European collections only, with a similar structure to that devised by CGSwans for the two incarnations of the 2020 UK/Ireland Cup but on a larger scale; four initial divisions of six zoological collections each, where each zoo will play each other once. After this point, the top three collections in each division will move forward into a pair of semi-final divisions; within these divisions, each trio of collections will play only the three qualifiers from the other half of the draw and carry over the relevant results from their first-round matches with one another. The champion of each semi-final division will then finally go forward to the finals (the precise format of which I intend to reveal later) in order to face their counterpart and determine the final winner.

If anyone is confused about the above, I've quoted the full explanation of the original match structure concept from the 2020 threads below, although note that the collections cited do not indicate anything about the competitors this time round:



If all goes well and there is sufficient continued interest, enthusiasm and participation from the forum community for the task to feel worthwhile, I do have hopes to extend the Cup beyond Europe.... but we will focus on the task immediately ahead of us for the foreseeable!

Voting format

The issue of how best to strike a balance between allowing a fine degree of subtlety in voting and avoiding excessive complexity has been a recurrent issue in previous iterations of the Zoochat Cup; at various points CGSwans and/or myself have attempted a 3-vote system, a 3-vote system with optional bonus points, and a 5-vote system. I've given a lot of consideration to this point, and I have decided that we will once again be playing with a 5-vote system; it will be impossible to vote for a perfect tie, but it will allow more subtle judgements to be made and hopefully reflect a close-run match a lot more accurately.

In order to prevent the potential imbalance that overtly-biased votes represent, this all comes with one important caveat: if one gives a 5-0 vote, you MUST provide appropriate justification for this in-thread. Any such votes which are either unexplained, or break the rules of fair play in some fashion, will be void.

The other key point which should be made here is that you don’t need to have visited a zoo to vote - but naturally, if you *have* visited a collection and your vote is based on this experience, sharing your knowledge and insight within the relevant thread will be incredibly valuable, and provide a jumping-off point for those individuals who lack your experience to make their own minds up on the matter! As noted above, I very much hope that this thread and the various matches that will follow will form the hub of discussion, debate and above all the sharing of knowledge.

Participants

When drawing up a shortlist of zoological collections to take part in the Zoochat Cup, I was influenced by several considerations; naturally, I knew that I wanted to include a wide range of collections commonly held by members of this forum to be amongst the very best that Europe has to offer, but equally I also wanted to represent the diversity in history, design philosophy and culture which can be found throughout the zoological collections of the continent, and as such consciously limited the number of German collections I included. Perhaps just as importantly, my decision to limit the overall field to a total of 24 collections required some fairly brutal decisions - and I do not doubt that some of the omissions will be hotly contested!

One way in which I was able to somewhat mitigate this limitation is that I have once again incorporated the mechanic which @CGSwans devised for the last UK Cup regarding collections which fall under the aegis of a larger zoological organisation alongside a sister collection - this has allowed me to include a few extra collections which I felt needed to be included, although it should be noted that I have deliberately kept one such pair separate to prevent the risk of undue dominance in the overall competition.

As such the final shortlist of 24 competitors stands as follows:

  • Zoo Berlin
  • Tierpark Berlin
  • Leipzig
  • Cologne
  • Frankfurt
  • Wilhelma (Stuttgart)
  • Wroclaw
  • Zurich
  • Tiergarten Schoenbrunn (Vienna)
  • Zagreb
  • Copenhagen
  • Budapest
  • Burgers' Zoo (Arnhem)
  • Artis (Amsterdam)
  • Paris Zoo and Menagerie des Plantes
  • ZooParc Beauval
  • Prague
  • Plzen and Akva-Terra
  • Pairi Daiza
  • Antwerp Zoo and Planckendael
  • Chester
  • London and Whipsnade
  • Nuremburg
  • Basel

The overall split of zoological collections across the four initial divisions will be randomised, but in order to keep things interesting and avoid the risk of one single division being overly-loaded with stronger competitors, I have elected to select four seeds which will each be specifically-placed within a different league; these are shown in bold above.

Match Categories

As with previous iterations of the Zoochat Cup, the categories used within the competition matches will be randomly assigned, and will fall under three overall "genres" - taxonomic, geographic, and biome. I'll keep the precise categories a surprise for now, although those of you who recall previous competitions will doubtless be able to predict some/all of them!

---

My plan is to announce the divisional splits tomorrow, with the first two matches following in the evening. Until then, let me know if there is anything further that requires clarification - this *is* the longest post I have written for a long time, so I might well have missed something or other!

Finally, I hope you all enjoy the matches to come :)
I am really looking forward to all of these matches, and I hope you enjoy your nice delicious cups of tea. :) I read the past ZooChat Cup threads, they were all really good, it is great to see this competition revived!
 
ZooChat European Tea Cup ! 2025 stars very promising :) Thank you for willing to dedicate time and efforts to facilitate such a monumental task @TeaLovingDave ! I have been to all of the zoos of your final selection and will be happy to follow the matches. Many ZooChaters visited the collections in question post-covid and I hope it will be a lot of engagement and intresting discussions :)
 
I ‘watched’ the ZooChat Cup sub-forum the moment you announced this was coming - this is so exciting.

Been to 8 (or I suppose 7.5 - Antwerp but not Planckendael) of the 24 zoos, and naturally I especially look forward to participating in threads where they’re involved, but equally this could be a great chance to expand on my knowledge of the great European zoos that I am yet to visit.
 
Thanks very much for kick-starting this competition up again and I would agree that it boosts morale and community engagement on the site. You admitted to making "some fairly brutal decisions" and of course that means some excellent, famous zoos will be omitted (Doue, Dublin, Givskud, Hagenbeck, Hannover, Munich, Rotterdam, Zlin, etc.) but I like your choices and this will be yet another exciting 2025 thread to look forward to. :) Counting Antwerp and Planckendael as ONE makes things very intriguing as they are sister zoos but arguably could have each qualified for the final 24 on their own.
 
You admitted to making "some fairly brutal decisions" and of course that means some excellent, famous zoos will be omitted (Doue, Dublin, Givskud, Hagenbeck, Hannover, Munich, Rotterdam, Zlin, etc.)

Of which the latter five (Hagenbeck, Hannover, Munich, Rotterdam, Zlin) were on the initial long-list before I decided to reduce the overall field down to 24 zoological collections - of those you cited, the last two to be dropped were Munich and Zlin (both of which I am rather fond of) and the first to be dropped was, it might surprise you to hear, Hagenbeck!

As for the others you cite, my knowledge of Doue and Givskud is pretty-much nonexistent, and as such they were never really in consideration. Dublin - although an excellent zoo in my opinion - has an animal collection which is poorly-balanced for the purposes of the Zoochat Cup, with few birds and pretty much no ectotherms whatsoever.... which would pretty much mean that multiple zero-point matches would be a high likelihood.

The first matches will roll out tonight, but in the meantime to whet people's appetite for what is to come (and get people thinking about some of the brutal match-ups which we have ahead of us) here are the divisional splits:

HECK LEAGUE (A)


Chester
Artis
Zurich
Vienna
Basel
Paris / Menagerie

HEINROTH LEAGUE (B)

Prague
Copenhagen
Budapest
Zagreb
Wroclaw
Antwerp / Planckendael

FRÄDRICH LEAGUE (C)

Zoo Berlin
Frankfurt
Beauval
Cologne
London / Whipsnade
Burgers

BODINUS LEAGUE (D)

Tierpark Berlin
Pairi Daiza
Leipzig
Plzen / Akva-Terra
Stuttgart
Nuremberg

It probably won't surprise anyone who knows me that I have gone with a particular theme for the naming of the leagues!
 
Of which the latter five (Hagenbeck, Hannover, Munich, Rotterdam, Zlin) were on the initial long-list before I decided to reduce the overall field down to 24 zoological collections - of those you cited, the last two to be dropped were Munich and Zlin (both of which I am rather fond of) and the first to be dropped was, it might surprise you to hear, Hagenbeck!

As for the others you cite, my knowledge of Doue and Givskud is pretty-much nonexistent, and as such they were never really in consideration. Dublin - although an excellent zoo in my opinion - has an animal collection which is poorly-balanced for the purposes of the Zoochat Cup, with few birds and pretty much no ectotherms whatsoever.... which would pretty much mean that multiple zero-point matches would be a high likelihood.

The first matches will roll out tonight, but in the meantime to whet people's appetite for what is to come (and get people thinking about some of the brutal match-ups which we have ahead of us) here are the divisional splits:

HECK LEAGUE (A)


Chester
Artis
Zurich
Vienna
Basel
Paris / Menagerie

HEINROTH LEAGUE (B)

Prague
Copenhagen
Budapest
Zagreb
Wroclaw
Antwerp / Planckendael

FRÄDRICH LEAGUE (C)

Zoo Berlin
Frankfurt
Beauval
Cologne
London / Whipsnade
Burgers

BODINUS LEAGUE (D)

Tierpark Berlin
Pairi Daiza
Leipzig
Plzen / Akva-Terra
Stuttgart
Nuremberg

It probably won't surprise anyone who knows me that I have gone with a particular theme for the naming of the leagues!
Didn't expect the category names to be the surnames of past Berlin Zoo directors
 
Of which the latter five (Hagenbeck, Hannover, Munich, Rotterdam, Zlin) were on the initial long-list before I decided to reduce the overall field down to 24 zoological collections - of those you cited, the last two to be dropped were Munich and Zlin (both of which I am rather fond of) and the first to be dropped was, it might surprise you to hear, Hagenbeck!

As for the others you cite, my knowledge of Doue and Givskud is pretty-much nonexistent, and as such they were never really in consideration. Dublin - although an excellent zoo in my opinion - has an animal collection which is poorly-balanced for the purposes of the Zoochat Cup, with few birds and pretty much no ectotherms whatsoever.... which would pretty much mean that multiple zero-point matches would be a high likelihood.

The first matches will roll out tonight, but in the meantime to whet people's appetite for what is to come (and get people thinking about some of the brutal match-ups which we have ahead of us) here are the divisional splits:

HECK LEAGUE (A)


Chester
Artis
Zurich
Vienna
Basel
Paris / Menagerie

HEINROTH LEAGUE (B)

Prague
Copenhagen
Budapest
Zagreb
Wroclaw
Antwerp / Planckendael

FRÄDRICH LEAGUE (C)

Zoo Berlin
Frankfurt
Beauval
Cologne
London / Whipsnade
Burgers

BODINUS LEAGUE (D)

Tierpark Berlin
Pairi Daiza
Leipzig
Plzen / Akva-Terra
Stuttgart
Nuremberg

It probably won't surprise anyone who knows me that I have gone with a particular theme for the naming of the leagues!

Excited for this! Looked at the first group, thought that one was really tough, and then saw C and D :P. Going to be really interesting, looking forward to participating.
 
Didn't expect the category names to be the surnames of past Berlin Zoo directors

Although Zoo Berlin isn't quite my favourite zoo (Tierpark Berlin edges it out, in part because it was the first non-UK zoo I ever visited) the history of the collection is a particular interest of mine; for instance, to the best of my knowledge I own the largest collection of Zoo Berlin guidebooks outside Germany and Poland, including one with no known surviving copies other than my own.

As such, it's not that surprising a choice :D
 
The first two matches are up, and I think both have a lot of potential for discussion, debate and amiable argument!

European (Tea)Cup - League A - Artis vs Vienna

European (Tea)Cup - League C - Zoo Berlin vs London/Whipsnade

To ensure everyone has seen the final bit of rule-based housekeeping I forgot to cover previously (alongside a repetition of another important point) I have added it to the opening post of each match and replicate it below:

There are a lot of angles at which one may choose to approach the question of how to choose where to assign your votes - species, exhibits, conservation - but I will remind you all of one long-standing rule - future plans and developments at a collection are out of bounds for consideration, and it is the current status quo which we are discussing and voting on. For instance, if either Pairi Daiza or Beauval were to be assigned the category of "Primates" at some point, the upcoming Golden Snub-nosed Monkeys would not be permissible as a reason to vote for them until they have actually arrived. Similarly, if a large area is currently under construction or redevelopment, it is ineligible for consideration.

Another point which bears repeating from my introductory post: if one gives a 5-0 vote, you MUST provide appropriate justification for this in-thread. Any such votes which are either unexplained, or break the rules of fair play in some fashion, will be void.

You have three days to discuss, debate and vote - enjoy!

You will also note that (as usual) all votes are visible, and can be changed freely if you feel that the discussion has changed your feelings on a given issue!
 
I may not have ventured outside the US at all, but I love these ZooChat cups and reading up on the debates they generate, so I will definitely be following this even if I won't be participating directly. I hope something can be done for a North America version in the future.
 
I may not have ventured outside the US at all, but I love these ZooChat cups and reading up on the debates they generate, so I will definitely be following this even if I won't be participating directly. I hope something can be done for a North America version in the future.

Don't feel like you require first-hand knowledge and experience to participate! The opinion of an outsider is just as valuable - and of course, this is one reason why I want to encourage people to post their logic and reasoning for their votes, and hence assist others to make their own minds up on a given issue. If community interest remains strong enough for me to continue onto the rest of the world, I certainly won't let the fact I've never been outside Europe stop me from actively participating in the votes!

In other words, even if you don't immediately feel comfortable voting, please do take part in the discussions with your own thoughts and insight :) and you never know - you might eventually feel like voting too....
 
As someone who has little knowledge about European zoos in general, but would love to participate, it would be really helpful if people who have visited the respective zoos made nice posts outlining everything each zoo has to offer for a particular category.
 
Last edited:
As someone who has little knowledge about European zoos in general, but would love to participate, it would be really helpful if people who have visited the respective zoos make nice posts outlining everything each zoo has to offer for a particular category.

What in particular are looking for past what is already in those threads? I feel like people have already done a good job at this. The only thing I feel is missing at this point is a stronger argument for Artis, but if no one is willing to take that viewpoint it is hard to ask them to argue for that. Species lists and the galleries do exist as well if you want to look some things up for yourself as I do.
 
So, the first batch of results is in, with one match in particular very much coming right down to the wire:

Zoo Berlin vs London / Whipsnade - CARNIVORES

Zoo Berlin - 93/185 points - 50.270%
London / Whipsnade - 92/185 points - 49.729%

Artis vs Vienna - AFRICA

Artis - 56/145 points - 38.620%
Vienna - 89/145 points - 61.379%

And the next pair of matches - which, I think, hold the potential to be just as closely-fought and ripe for discussion as was the case in the opening matches!

European (Tea)Cup - League B - Prague vs Antwerp & Planckendael

European (Tea)Cup - League D - Pairi Daiza vs Plzen

A few reminders; firstly, that one does not require personal experience of a given collection (or indeed either collection within a particular match) to participate; secondly, even if the result seems fairly locked-in every vote really does count, as the fine margins in overall averages can play a big role deeper into the overall Cup; and finally, that if you are not willing to justify and explain a 5-0 vote it will be disregarded, so it is better that you do not waste your own time and mine by making it in the first place.
 
The second batch of results is in, after two matches full of precisely the sort of discussion and debate which I have been hoping for:

Prague vs Antwerp & Planckendael - HOOFSTOCK

Prague - 101/155 points - 65.161%
Antwerp/Planckendael - 54 points - 34.839%

Pairi Daiza vs Plzen - CARNIVORES

Pairi Daiza - 79/160 points - 49.375%
Plzen - 81/160 points - 50.625%

It should be noted that the latter of these two matches was deadlocked at exactly 80/80 points apiece (once the invalid 5/0 vote for Pairi Daiza was discounted) until 10 seconds before the match ended; having left it as long as possible in the hope a tiebreak vote would come along, I altered my vote to break the deadlock in the direction which would alter the overall percentages the least (I also considered changing my vote to a 5/0 Pairi to make it ineligible, but if I calculated things correctly this would have thrown the average out more).

And the third pair of matches, which I think will once again spark a lot of discussion and debate!

European (Tea)Cup - League A - Chester vs Artis

European (Tea)Cup - League C - London & Whipsnade vs Burgers

Enjoy!
 
Actually, I've just thought of a better solution for the Pairi/Plzen match deadlock - my tiebreak vote stands as regards Plzen being the official victor of the match, BUT the match percentages which will be carried over for the purposes of determining progression will revert to the 50% apiece which the two collections earned during the voting process :)

Pairi Daiza - 80/160 points - 50.000%
Plzen - 80/160 points - 50.000%
 
Actually, I've just thought of a better solution for the Pairi/Plzen match deadlock - my tiebreak vote stands as regards Plzen being the official victor of the match, BUT the match percentages which will be carried over for the purposes of determining progression will revert to the 50% apiece which the two collections earned during the voting process :)

Pairi Daiza - 80/160 points - 50.000%
Plzen - 80/160 points - 50.000%
So do I infer correctly that the match percentages are the first factor used to determine who advances, rather than a tiebreaker (equivalent of goal difference in football terms, which is how I initially interpreted it)? Therefore meaning it is in theory possible for a zoo to advance even with six defeats from six, so long as they were all by fine margins? No issue with this format (it is much fairer, although I do feel it makes 'upsets' less likely because the big zoos are unlikely to lose by high percentages), just curious because unless I have missed something, it has not been established previously.

Either way, may I ask why it was deemed necessary to break a deadlock. Surely a draw is a perfectly fine result, or does every match need a winner due to a detail I have missed? Again, not being critical of your format, just making sure that I fully understand it.
 
Either way, may I ask why it was deemed necessary to break a deadlock. Surely a draw is a perfectly fine result, or does every match need a winner due to a detail I have missed? Again, not being critical of your format, just making sure that I fully understand it.

I was curious about this as well. Draws happen in competitions and as long as it's not the playoffs/championship they don't worry too much if it is a tie as they have eventual tiebreakers when it comes to moving out of the pool.
 
I can't really participate much other than Group C, as I've been to four (technically five) of the six (seven) competitors there. Nonetheless, I'll be happy to share my thoughts as and when I can.
 
Back
Top