Lafone
Well-Known Member
I think it’s important that the planning system is fair; it’s not right that we treat every greenfield site as sacrosanct regardless of its ecological use when we have such a severe housing shortage. Regardless, I think it’s better this is discussed in a specialist thread.
If you reference the link you'll see there is no requirement or desire to make greenfield (or brownfield, you seem to treat both the same as you referenced brownfield sites as irrelevant earlier) 'sacrosanct', merely to protect nature and you should feel free to continue the 'discussion' wherever you wish.





