Queens Zoo Queens Zoo review 2025

snowleopard

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Premium Member
Queens Zoo review:

I visited this zoo on August 13th, and it was my first ever trip to the facility. What really surprised me was how small it was, easily seen in an hour although that includes just a few minutes in the farmyard zone. The amenities are bare bones, as there is a single set of restrooms about halfway through the zoo, along with a tiny cafe that serves pre-made sandwiches and a small gift shop. A food truck was the sole offering for lunch and drinks were in a cooler on the ground that a family would take to the beach. For an AZA-accredited, Wildlife Conservation Society establishment, I was a little taken aback.

The good news is that the zoo is of a high standard, with only around 15 exhibits but there is a clear theme of focusing on animals from North and South America. I liked how the outer walking loop was wide and paved, but the short pathways to each enclosure consisted of woodchip paths. My wife and I went in the ornate entrance gates and headed right, past Andean Bears, a delightful aviary for Thick-billed Parrots and Burrowing Owls, Chacoan Peccaries and Southern Pudu, before making it to the approximate halfway point where one can sip a soda and look out at American Bison and California Sea Lions.

Up next are exhibits for species such as Coyote, Elk, Great Horned Owl, Cougar, Canada Lynx, Bald Eagle and American Alligator, plus a waterfowl pond. That's the entire zoo, except for the impressive 1964 Aviary with a winding path that goes up and then down in a one-way fashion. I was happy to see the zoo full of visitors on a smoking hot afternoon, including a couple of summer camp groups, but it is very tiny indeed.

Afterwards, we walked through Queens Park and past the New York Hall of Science and we spent an hour inside Queens Museum, which has a lot of information about the 1964 World's Fair and an absolutely staggering achievement in the shape of a vast panorama model of New York City. It's a massive room and an incredible creation that's well worth seeing and it was built in the 1960s but updated with 60,000 additions to the year 1992. It must be one of the largest scale models on the planet. We then wandered over to the million-pound, gigantic steel 'Unisphere' sculpture and later on that night we went to our first ever Major League Baseball game (Mets vs Braves). From strolling through the neighborhood from the subway station to Queens Park, it's what I'd call a rough-looking area, but between the zoo, the hall of science, the museum and baseball stadium it's well worth visiting the borough of Queens. :)
 
Queens Zoo review:

I visited this zoo on August 13th, and it was my first ever trip to the facility. What really surprised me was how small it was, easily seen in an hour although that includes just a few minutes in the farmyard zone. The amenities are bare bones, as there is a single set of restrooms about halfway through the zoo, along with a tiny cafe that serves pre-made sandwiches and a small gift shop. A food truck was the sole offering for lunch and drinks were in a cooler on the ground that a family would take to the beach. For an AZA-accredited, Wildlife Conservation Society establishment, I was a little taken aback.

The good news is that the zoo is of a high standard, with only around 15 exhibits but there is a clear theme of focusing on animals from North and South America. I liked how the outer walking loop was wide and paved, but the short pathways to each enclosure consisted of woodchip paths. My wife and I went in the ornate entrance gates and headed right, past Andean Bears, a delightful aviary for Thick-billed Parrots and Burrowing Owls, Chacoan Peccaries and Southern Pudu, before making it to the approximate halfway point where one can sip a soda and look out at American Bison and California Sea Lions.

Up next are exhibits for species such as Coyote, Elk, Great Horned Owl, Cougar, Canada Lynx, Bald Eagle and American Alligator, plus a waterfowl pond. That's the entire zoo, except for the impressive 1964 Aviary with a winding path that goes up and then down in a one-way fashion. I was happy to see the zoo full of visitors on a smoking hot afternoon, including a couple of summer camp groups, but it is very tiny indeed.

Afterwards, we walked through Queens Park and past the New York Hall of Science and we spent an hour inside Queens Museum, which has a lot of information about the 1964 World's Fair and an absolutely staggering achievement in the shape of a vast panorama model of New York City. It's a massive room and an incredible creation that's well worth seeing and it was built in the 1960s but updated with 60,000 additions to the year 1992. It must be one of the largest scale models on the planet. We then wandered over to the million-pound, gigantic steel 'Unisphere' sculpture and later on that night we went to our first ever Major League Baseball game (Mets vs Braves). From strolling through the neighborhood from the subway station to Queens Park, it's what I'd call a rough-looking area, but between the zoo, the hall of science, the museum and baseball stadium it's well worth visiting the borough of Queens. :)
I always found Queens Zoo very charming, although I do agree that their guest services are the worst of the WCS. I do appreciate that despite having a similar focus on American species as the Bergen County Zoo across the Hudson, its collection and exhibitory is much different.
I’ve never been the museum there and honestly you have me intrigued to go visit next time I find myself in Queens. Also, my apologies that you chose the Mets as your first MLB game :p
 
although I do agree that their guest services are the worst of the WCS.

I would argue Prospect Park has this honor. In terms of eating options, at least Queens has the food truck to get a cooked meal at, while Prospect Park just has the similar cafe/gift shop to Queens with limited food options.

Honestly though, do either of these zoos need more than what is already there in terms of food options? An 1.5 hours is enough to likely see either zoo for both families, which means you can easily fit a visit in either before or after lunch. Adding more to either would likely be a further drain on money as due to the small size of these zoos not many would chose to have lunch at the zoo and higher personnel costs associated with staffing it.
 
I would argue Prospect Park has this honor. In terms of eating options, at least Queens has the food truck to get a cooked meal at, while Prospect Park just has the similar cafe/gift shop to Queens with limited food options.

Honestly though, do either of these zoos need more than what is already there in terms of food options? An 1.5 hours is enough to likely see either zoo for both families, which means you can easily fit a visit in either before or after lunch. Adding more to either would likely be a further drain on money as due to the small size of these zoos not many would chose to have lunch at the zoo and higher personnel costs associated with staffing it.
I will also add another WCS small zoo in Central Park has their main restaurant separate from the zoo, likely to capitalize on people visiting the entire park for the day. If a family can knock out a zoo in less than 2 hours, it really doesn’t need a restaurant imo and the services don’t impact my opinion on Queens too much
 
Here is the 140-foot high, almost one-million-pound steel structure called the 'Unisphere' that I mentioned in my review. It's a 5-minute walk from the zoo to see this 1964 object.

full


The heavily forested Aviary, also dating from 1964, is a highlight of Queens Zoo.

full


What's fascinating is how few California Sea Lions are at the Wildlife Conservation Society zoos. I can recall seeing at least 35 California Sea Lions all together at SeaWorld San Diego back in 2011, and some European zoos have a dozen or more sea lions in one pool.

I only saw 2 sea lions at Prospect Park Zoo, only 2 at Central Park Zoo, only 3 at Queens Zoo, only 2 in each of the 2 exhibits at New York Aquarium, and I think that Bronx Zoo had 4 California Sea Lions as that zoo has the largest sea lion pool. Very small numbers overall.

My rankings of the WCS California Sea Lion exhibits are as follows:

#1 - Bronx (largest and arguably the best of the lot)
#2 - Queens (very naturalistic backdrop)
#3 - New York Aquarium (two exhibits plus a sea lion show)
#4 - Prospect Park Zoo (tiny and with only 2 animals)
#5 - Central Park Zoo (also tiny and with only 2 animals)

California Sea Lion exhibit at Queens Zoo:

full
 
Here is the 140-foot high, almost one-million-pound steel structure called the 'Unisphere' that I mentioned in my review. It's a 5-minute walk from the zoo to see this 1964 object.

full


The heavily forested Aviary, also dating from 1964, is a highlight of Queens Zoo.

full


What's fascinating is how few California Sea Lions are at the Wildlife Conservation Society zoos. I can recall seeing at least 35 California Sea Lions all together at SeaWorld San Diego back in 2011, and some European zoos have a dozen or more sea lions in one pool.

I only saw 2 sea lions at Prospect Park Zoo, only 2 at Central Park Zoo, only 3 at Queens Zoo, only 2 in each of the 2 exhibits at New York Aquarium, and I think that Bronx Zoo had 4 California Sea Lions as that zoo has the largest sea lion pool. Very small numbers overall.

My rankings of the WCS California Sea Lion exhibits are as follows:

#1 - Bronx (largest and arguably the best of the lot)
#2 - Queens (very naturalistic backdrop)
#3 - New York Aquarium (two exhibits plus a sea lion show)
#4 - Prospect Park Zoo (tiny and with only 2 animals)
#5 - Central Park Zoo (also tiny and with only 2 animals)

California Sea Lion exhibit at Queens Zoo:

full
Here is the 140-foot high, almost one-million-pound steel structure called the 'Unisphere' that I mentioned in my review. It's a 5-minute walk from the zoo to see this 1964 object.

full


The heavily forested Aviary, also dating from 1964, is a highlight of Queens Zoo.

full


What's fascinating is how few California Sea Lions are at the Wildlife Conservation Society zoos. I can recall seeing at least 35 California Sea Lions all together at SeaWorld San Diego back in 2011, and some European zoos have a dozen or more sea lions in one pool.

I only saw 2 sea lions at Prospect Park Zoo, only 2 at Central Park Zoo, only 3 at Queens Zoo, only 2 in each of the 2 exhibits at New York Aquarium, and I think that Bronx Zoo had 4 California Sea Lions as that zoo has the largest sea lion pool. Very small numbers overall.

My rankings of the WCS California Sea Lion exhibits are as follows:

#1 - Bronx (largest and arguably the best of the lot)
#2 - Queens (very naturalistic backdrop)
#3 - New York Aquarium (two exhibits plus a sea lion show)
#4 - Prospect Park Zoo (tiny and with only 2 animals)
#5 - Central Park Zoo (also tiny and with only 2 animals)

California Sea Lion exhibit at Queens Zoo:

full
The aquarium, in Coney Island, also holds California sea lions - at the expense of walrus and fur seals, formerly held.
They to expand the sea lion exhibits at each of the zoos but contraction supersedes expansion
 
later on that night we went to our first ever Major League Baseball game (Mets vs Braves).

I have not been to a Met's game at Citi Field yet, but towards the start of July I got the opportunity to umpire a game at the stadium for an All-Star game between two top level college summer leagues. It was a great experience and the first time I got to umpire at a big league venue.
 
I have not been to a Met's game at Citi Field yet, but towards the start of July I got the opportunity to umpire a game at the stadium for an All-Star game between two top level college summer leagues. It was a great experience and the first time I got to umpire at a big league venue.
There is not even a sign at the 111th street station on the #7 line to mark the Queen Zoo can reached from that station
 
Back
Top