Sumatran Tiger Updates:
Per an Auckland Correspondence, one year old Cahya will soon be Christchurch bound.
Her parents will also be re-paired; with the hope for them to produce a larger litter this time around.
Thank you for sharing.
Even at 22 months of age, Cahya remains one of the zoo’s most popular attractions; but I’m thrilled that her transfer will enable Auckland Zoo to breed again. With three exhibits (and the separation of Zayana and Cahya inevitable), Auckland Zoo’s keepers were adamant no breeding recommendation would follow until Cahya left.
Auckland Zoo have one of the best tiger complexes in the region, so it’d be great to see it fully utilised via a larger litter. Zayana herself was a quadruplet and litters of 3-4 aren’t uncommon in this subspecies.
Ramah was always planned to remain at Auckland due to his temperament; but I’m glad Zayana will be as well. She’s one of the most confident tigers I’ve seen in captivity and her daughter has clearly taken her lead in that regard. I regularly see both females up close by the glass, completely unphased by even large crowds.
While I'll miss Cahya, this is very good news for the species. At last genetically valuable Reggie will be paired, and it's great news that Ramah and Zayana will be breeding again.
It’ll be interesting to see how Auckland Zoo’s visitors perceive this transfer. Unlike the majority of ZooChatters (and of course staff) who acknowledge the bigger picture and the multiple positives this transfer will have; the general public often fail to see the bigger picture and complain their favourite animal is leaving.
Either way, I’m sure a new litter of cubs (which could come as soon as the first half of 2026) will cheer them up!
Reggie is long overdue a breeding recommendation. It came as a surprise to me that Scout was recommended for transfer to Hamilton instead of him back; but I acknowledge they both descend from the same wild born founders, so in the broader sense it was irrelevant which male went (even if Reggie is the only living offspring of his mother).
The animals are usually owned by the zoo they're at; not by the overarching program. As a result, the zoos tend to have the last say. More often than not, they tend to agree - as the moves are for the greater good of the entire population. And if they refused such a move, it would likely leave a bad taste in the mouth of others and those who run the program.Although I did hear from a senior keeper that zoos do have some input into the decisions around transfers, and she said that if Charlie and Melur were ever recommended to be transferred elsewhere, the zoo would refuse because of the strength of the bond between this pair of orangutans (although such a scenario is now very unlikely given their ages).
Many zoo visitors indeed don't see the bigger picture and feel saddened that they are losing favoirte animals, which is understandable in a way. But the majority don't realise that animals don't belong to the zoo as such, but to the various international breeding programmes. Although I did hear from a senior keeper that zoos do have some input into the decisions around transfers, and she said that if Charlie and Melur were ever recommended to be transferred elsewhere, the zoo would refuse because of the strength of the bond between this pair of orangutans (although such a scenario is now very unlikely given their ages).
I'm hoping that Auckland will decide to retain Bahmi, though!
This certainly hits the nail on the head.To state the obvious, the impact on the hierarchy is something to consider across many social species.
That’s correct. It’s very much a consultative process, where zoos can decline to send an animal or give feedback on a more suitable candidate.
When Auckland Zoo’s Sumatran tiger Nisha died in 2006, the species coordinator recommended one of her sisters at Hamilton Zoo transfer up. Genetically speaking, it didn’t matter which one came, so Hamilton Zoo recommended Molek on the basis she was more confident than her sister and would adapt better to the change.
I’m similarly aware of chimpanzee transfers that were recommended and then the sending zoo asked to send a different female because of the impact the removal of that offspring would have had on its mother. To state the obvious, the impact on the hierarchy is something to consider across many social species.
@Jambo @Zoofan15 - thanks for clearing that up about the breeding programmes - looks like I was indeed mistaken about who owns the animals, but it does seem like zoos have the last say. And it makes sense that transfers also do depend on animal temperament, which was why Daya was recommended for Auckland (easy-going nature, gets along well with other females and with infants and juveniles).
These are Bornean orangutans.she said that if Charlie and Melur were ever recommended to be transferred elsewhere, the zoo would refuse because of the strength of the bond between this pair of orangutans (although such a scenario is now very unlikely given their ages).
I'm hoping that Auckland will decide to retain Bahmi, though!
These are Asian elephants.Another example is Auckland Zoo importing Anjalee. Andrew Coers led the search to identify a companion for Burma, with a strong focus on identifying a female who would be a good personality match for Burma. Kashin was mismatched to both Ma Schwe and Burma and took years to warm to the latter.
It was clear upon Anjalee’s arrival what a great choice had been made. They formed a near instant friendship and while they never developed the closeness you’d expect to see between related females, they were excellent companions for each other. The only downside imo was that their ages meant their energy levels were mismatched. Anjalee was a great companion to Burma; but had she arrived 20 years earlier, she’d have been even better!
How many Spider Monkeys does this leave Auckland with now?The two female spider monkeys who transferred to Wellington Zoo were Kiara (2018) and Jeanie (2018).
How many Spider Monkeys does this leave Auckland with now?
Elephant exhibit update:
After the Dinosaur exhibition (a temporary exhibition) wrapped up on 31/10/2025, I was hopeful we’d hear news of a permanent redevelopment of the old elephant exhibit.
Disappointingly, Auckland Zoo have announced another temporary exhibition will occupy this space from 18/12/2025 (this time a display of art work from visitors).
Auckland Zoo have had long enough to devise a permanent replacement for the elephants, so presumably they’re awaiting funding/approval for this redevelopment.
From socials:,
We're asking people of all ages to share your art, photography, or poetry with us for our 'In Your Nature Community Art Trail’ that will open at the Zoo on 18 December. This is open to our whole community and can be anything from finger painting to fine art!
We’ll be accepting photograph or written submissions of drawings, sculpture, paintings, poetry and of course beautiful photography. Submissions open today (3 November) and can be made up until Friday 21 November.
With the Dinosaur Discovery Track winter activation finished, we're now preparing this space for our temporary art trail which will be free for all visitors to enjoy with their Zoo ticket.
That's a nuisance. I was hoping Auckland Zoo would get back on track with its primary purpose - animal exhibits!
I am curious why they don't just mix cheetahs in with the rhinos in Burma and Anjalee's old space - or incorporate a cheetah expansion.We all were. In the past, Auckland Zoo have done some decent temporary exhibitions including historic elephant photos (displayed in the Elephant House) and an exhibition celebrating the zoo’s centennial year (displayed in the Domes); but an exhibition that’s predominantly gonna be kids artwork sounds downright tedious. Not to mention its further stalling on the redevelopment of the elephant exhibit, which was vacated 12 months ago now.
In a comment on a post, the zoo have stated the elephant exhibit will be developed as part of the Africa Safari Track. This is a statement that’s been made in the past, so it’s unclear if this reflects recent meetings held by senior management on the zoo’s masterplan; but if so, implies a Savannah expansion is still in the works. At a minimum, I hope this includes future provision for Waterbuck; and the retention of Hamadryas baboon. Enough species have already been phased out, with more to follow (pinnipeds etc).
I am curious why they don't just mix cheetahs in with the rhinos in Burma and Anjalee's old space - or incorporate a cheetah expansion.