johnstoni
Well-Known Member
There are many factors as to why an animal does not use the exhibit space.
I don't think you can make the assertion that an individual 'likes' to be in its holding area simply because you witness it choosing to occupy that space repeatedly. Olfactory, aural and visual over-stimulation from visitors, vehicles or adjacent species, or lack of shade, shelter from wind or rain etc can all contribute to an animal choosing a barren holding area rather than being out on exhibit. Also, if an area is shared on rotation, a less confident animal may not be comfortable in a space which smells strongly of other individuals it is not directly mixed with.
With the level of cooperation between institutions these days, is there really any need to hold 5 okapi or 7 Indian rhino if you have to rotate them on exhibit? Are the off-exhibit holding spaces as large?
Temperate zoos holding tropical/desert/warm grassland species already have a problem keeping their animals outdoors through the winter, with temperature and light levels being low.
I haven't seen animals on rotation since London zoo did it with its antelopes until the 1990s. Even then, the animals not given access to the outside paddock were still on display. I find it slightly disingenuous for any institution to present an animal as if, to the average visitor, it occupies the display area most of the time, rather than as one of a relatively identical 'cast' of individuals of the same species. I think this kind of rotation is completely different from managing a breeding group in a largely off-exhibit facility, with a display enclosure attached simply to demonstrate a small part of the group and the work of the zoo. Which is it at the Bronx?
I don't think you can make the assertion that an individual 'likes' to be in its holding area simply because you witness it choosing to occupy that space repeatedly. Olfactory, aural and visual over-stimulation from visitors, vehicles or adjacent species, or lack of shade, shelter from wind or rain etc can all contribute to an animal choosing a barren holding area rather than being out on exhibit. Also, if an area is shared on rotation, a less confident animal may not be comfortable in a space which smells strongly of other individuals it is not directly mixed with.
With the level of cooperation between institutions these days, is there really any need to hold 5 okapi or 7 Indian rhino if you have to rotate them on exhibit? Are the off-exhibit holding spaces as large?
Temperate zoos holding tropical/desert/warm grassland species already have a problem keeping their animals outdoors through the winter, with temperature and light levels being low.
I haven't seen animals on rotation since London zoo did it with its antelopes until the 1990s. Even then, the animals not given access to the outside paddock were still on display. I find it slightly disingenuous for any institution to present an animal as if, to the average visitor, it occupies the display area most of the time, rather than as one of a relatively identical 'cast' of individuals of the same species. I think this kind of rotation is completely different from managing a breeding group in a largely off-exhibit facility, with a display enclosure attached simply to demonstrate a small part of the group and the work of the zoo. Which is it at the Bronx?