ANyhuis
Well-Known Member
with reference to snowleopards recent post
oregon $10 1,600,000 visitors
seattle $16.50 1,000,000 visitors
atlanta $19 700,000 visitors
The visitor income of these places is roughly the same .
True, but ONLY when you consider gate admission. With all of those extra people in the zoo, Oregon is benefiting far more from sales of food, souvenirs in the gift shops, and rides. For example, in our book's position, the Oregon Zoo has the best train ride in the USA. If a large chunk of those 1.6 million visitors are riding the train, that's a lot of income.
Regarding some of the other comments, SnowLeopard is right about Columbia, SC -- there's not much else to do there. Another advantage for their Riverbanks Zoo is its highway access. They have perhaps the best interstate highway access of any zoo. You just take the exit and ..pow! You're at the Zoo!
I would slightly disagree with his "there's nothing to do in Portland", though. While it doesn't quite match Seattle for things to do, Portland still has many tourist attractions, with museums, gardens, boat tours on the Columbia River, various mountain and waterfall hiking opportunities, and the beautiful Oregon Pacific coast only a couple hours away. My sister used to live there, so whenever one of us came to visit, there were plenty of choices for things to do. Portland is simply going to their zoo at a superior rate, compared to Seattle.