In recent years the trends seems to be to exhibit the critically endangered Amur leopard. But to me it seems a loss to other Leopard subspecies. Other subspecies such as the Javan leopard and Arabian leopard (both of which are also critically endnagered) seems to be shoved to one side to make room for the 'rarest cat in the world', And while I'm pleased that the plihgt of the amur leopard is more well known and safe guarded by zooo breeding. i can't but think that perhaps the zoo community should work as equally hard for other endagered leopard subspecies such as the Javan, persian, Sri Lankan (basically msot subspecies apart from african).
Does anyone else feel this is the case? I would love to see a greater variety in subspecies displayed at zoos, but udnerstand that zoo's would not want to exhibit 'another leopard' when they already have the 'rarest cat in the world' (by the way im not disputing the rarest cat in the world thing, but its at practically every zoo ).
Does anyone else feel this is the case? I would love to see a greater variety in subspecies displayed at zoos, but udnerstand that zoo's would not want to exhibit 'another leopard' when they already have the 'rarest cat in the world' (by the way im not disputing the rarest cat in the world thing, but its at practically every zoo ).