Some facts about the Aussie zoo industry

  • Thread starter Thread starter MRJ
  • Start date Start date

MRJ

Well-Known Member
15+ year member
Premium Member
Just been sent a copy of a “Report on the Economic and Social Contribution of the Zoological Industry in Australia”, commissioned by ARAZPA. There are some interesting facts some members of this group may be interested in. Figures mostly relate to 2007. The consultants surveyed in detail 20 zoos, including both government and non-government, and both ARAZPA and non-ARAZPA zoos, so the figures here are “blown up” to reflect the entire industry, and thus are only estimates.

Total income of zoos across Australia (government and private) was estimated at $424 million. It was estimated that for surveyed zoos about 30.7% of income was from entry fees, and about 27.2% was from state government grants. Next biggest was trading and franchise income at about 20.5%. The survey was a little heavy on government zoos, and elsewhere the consultants suggest that income from entry fees overall was about 40%.

There were an estimated 8.56 million visits to zoos annually, of which an estimated 3.3 million are overseas tourists. These were further divided into 3.45 million visits to zoos, 2.28 million to wildlife parks, and 2.28 million to aquariums and maritime parks (no definitions supplied}. Actual visitors (given that some will visit two or more zoos a year, or make multiple visits to one zoo) over 16 years of age was estimated at about 5.7 million individuals. This is about 35.6% of the population over 16, a figure that hasn’t changed in 10 years.

About 5800 people work full time in zoos, while about 2300 work part time. About 45% work directly with animals. There were also around 2200 volunteers, and over 160,000 members of friends organisations.

Per capita spending by states is also interesting: ACT $5.77, NSW $5.1, NT nil (strange), Qld nil, SA $1.98, Tas nil, Vic $2.24, WA $4.55, and overall $2.92. This effectively means that each government zoo visitor receives on average a $4.00 subsidy.

Food for thought.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the statistics! Definitely intriguing...
 
To me, this is one of the most significant and meaningful initiatives ever undertaken by ARAZPA - sorry, ZAA.
 
Our zoos do ok considering our population. I wonder if any of the queensland theme parks were included in this. Most likely not.
It may interest some that annual visitors to Seaworld where the whale killed it's trainer are on par with attendances for all of our zoos combined - but fair enough given the population difference.
 
To me, this is one of the most significant and meaningful initiatives ever undertaken by ARAZPA - sorry, ZAA.

Actually in the branding manual the acronym is still ARAZPA, ZAA is not to be used. Zoo Aquarium Association is effectively just being used as a shortened version of the full name. How successful that is remains to be seen.
 
"Branding manual" - haven't seen one of them!

However the ZAA acronym is actually used by [some] ARAZPA/ZAA/whatever it is staff.

And yes, time will tell how long this lasts - particularly as it was spawned without membership consultation.
 
"Branding manual" - haven't seen one of them!

However the ZAA acronym is actually used by [some] ARAZPA/ZAA/whatever it is staff.

And yes, time will tell how long this lasts - particularly as it was spawned without membership consultation.

Yes, it was only one page...! But you are right it is just second nature to turn it into an acronym. Wasn't ZAA some dodgie African airline? or am I getting things mixed up?
 
Table 1.1 Zoological Organisations in Australia -3

For SA, 4 Zoo's all being arazpa members. cited from -3 Ibid

Whats Ibid? and why is this figure so wrong?

And written above it
Of the 107 zoos, 39 are members of ARAZPA and 68
are not members. Of the non members, 20 belong to
the ARAZPA affiliated organisation called Australasian
Regional Association of Zoological Parks and Aquaria
of Queensland (ARAZPAQ). For the purposes of this
report these 20 members of ARAZPQ are treated as non
members of ARAZPA.
The table below describes the number of zoos in
Australia by state and territory and also by the number that
are ARAZPA members and non members.
Other contributors to the zoological industry include
academia, government research facilities, government
regulators and non-government organisations (NGOs
).
 
Last edited:
Table 1.1 Zoological Organisations in Australia -3

For SA, 4 Zoo's all being arazpa members. cited from -3 Ibid

Whats Ibid? and why is this figure so wrong?

And written above it
).

You've misread the table. It says four ARAZPA members (that would be Adelaide, Monarto, Cleland and Gorge) and four non-ARAZPA members (Urimbirra, Parndana, Bredl's and Humbug Scrub?).

The Victorian figures are probably awry though - they should read seven ARAZPA members (although calling Melbourne Museum a "zoo" is a stretch) and 4 non-members (Melbourne Aquarium, Mansfield, Kyabram and Phillip Island). There could be other small parks I'm unaware of too.
 
ZYBen said:
Table 1.1 Zoological Organisations in Australia -3

For SA, 4 Zoo's all being arazpa members. cited from -3 Ibid

Whats Ibid? and why is this figure so wrong?
'ibid' is a short form of the term 'ibidem'; it means "in the same place". When used in documents or scientific papers, it means that the reference is the same as the reference stated directly prior (so that the author doesn't have to keep repeating the same reference).
 
You've misread the table. It says four ARAZPA members (that would be Adelaide, Monarto, Cleland and Gorge) and four non-ARAZPA members (Urimbirra, Parndana, Bredl's and Humbug Scrub?).

The Victorian figures are probably awry though - they should read seven ARAZPA members (although calling Melbourne Museum a "zoo" is a stretch) and 4 non-members (Melbourne Aquarium, Mansfield, Kyabram and Phillip Island). There could be other small parks I'm unaware of too.

Ah ok, well even if i have read them wrong they are still a bit iffy, theres many more than that.
 
The Victorian figures are probably awry though - they should read seven ARAZPA members (although calling Melbourne Museum a "zoo" is a stretch) and 4 non-members (Melbourne Aquarium, Mansfield, Kyabram and Phillip Island). There could be other small parks I'm unaware of too.

When I did a marketing plan about 12 years ago I came up with a list of 63 collections open for public exhibition of animals to the public just in Victoria. Admittedly some were very small (one was an aviary in Caulfield Park) but there are a lot out there.
 
When I did a marketing plan about 12 years ago I came up with a list of 63 collections open for public exhibition of animals to the public just in Victoria. Admittedly some were very small (one was an aviary in Caulfield Park) but there are a lot out there.

Do you still have this list? I'm interested in collections past and present, so its being dated isn't a problem.

Did you include the likes of Collingwood Children's Farm and other domestic animal attractions? Personally I draw the line for a "zoo" that the principal focus of operation must be the exhibition of non-domestic animals. On that basis, I'd lean towards giving Ballarat Bird World (which I hope to visit when we finally get some decent weather here!) the status of "zoo", but Collingwood Children's Farm, which only has domestic animals, and Melbourne Museum which has a smattering of wildlife but is focused on museum exhibition, do not.
 
Do you still have this list? I'm interested in collections past and present, so its being dated isn't a problem.

Did you include the likes of Collingwood Children's Farm and other domestic animal attractions? Personally I draw the line for a "zoo" that the principal focus of operation must be the exhibition of non-domestic animals. On that basis, I'd lean towards giving Ballarat Bird World (which I hope to visit when we finally get some decent weather here!) the status of "zoo", but Collingwood Children's Farm, which only has domestic animals, and Melbourne Museum which has a smattering of wildlife but is focused on museum exhibition, do not.

Unfortunately I don't think so, it was on a computer long dead.

I included anywhere that exhibits "wild" animals, and excluded domestic-only collections. I would include the Museum, their collection is quite substantial these days. I think you have to include them even when the animals are only a minor attraction. For instance Phillip Island Raceway has a small fauna park, obviously a very small part of the business. If you include them you have to include the Museum.
 
Unfortunately I don't think so, it was on a computer long dead.

I included anywhere that exhibits "wild" animals, and excluded domestic-only collections. I would include the Museum, their collection is quite substantial these days. I think you have to include them even when the animals are only a minor attraction. For instance Phillip Island Raceway has a small fauna park, obviously a very small part of the business. If you include them you have to include the Museum.

I was under the impression that Phillip Island Nature Park had a reasonably substantial collection, but I've never been to the island - am I wrong?

I know that I'm taking this thread off-topic a little, and would encourage a moderator to split the thread. But I'm interested in seeing how many collections we can name. I know only of the following:
- Melbourne Zoo
- Werribee Open Range Zoo
- Healesville Sanctuary
- Ballarat Wildlife Park
- Halls Gap Zoo
- Moonlit Sanctuary
- Melbourne Museum
- Melbourne Aquarium
- Kyabram Fauna Park
- Mansfield Zoo
- Phillip Island Nature Park
- Ballarat Birdworld

Plus the following just discovered on Google:
- Cudgee Creek Wildlife Park, Cudgee
- Maru Koala Park, Grantville
- Jirrahlinga Koala Wildlife Sanctuary, Barwon Heads
- Wildlife Wonderland, Bass

The mind boggles at 50 more!?!
 
Last edited:
I was under the impression that Phillip Island Nature Park had a reasonably substantial collection, but I've never been to the island - am I wrong?

You have fallen for the confusion that often occurs on Phillip Island! Phillip Island Nature Park is not a zoo, but a semi-autonomous body that runs the public reserves on Phillip Island, including the Penguins and Churchill Island. It also runs the Koala Conservation Centre, which fits my definition of a zoo. (Churchill Island was also looking for wallabies under a display licence recently, so perhaps they qualify too). The three venues above are all ticketed, and the money raised runs the other reserves on Phillip Island.

Phillip Island Wildlife Park is a substantial wildlife park near Cowes, it has been in existence for about 50 years. I remember going there as a child, when they could only exhibit red kangaroos and not greys as they were prohibited from showing any wildlife indigenous to Victoria. They went through a major expansion about 20 years ago when David Hancocks of Seattle and Melbourne Zoos fame produced a master plan for them.

The park I was referring to is another small fauna park that is (or was) attached to the Phillip Island Grand Prix circuit.

Heading back towards Melbourne you are right there is Wildlife Wonderland (aka the Giant Worm) at Bass and Maru Koala Park & Mini-Golf Centre (to give it its full title) at Grantville. Then you come across Warrook Cattle Farm which also has a licence and a small collection.

Heading down the Mornington Peninsula you pass Moonlit Sanctuary at Pearcedale. At Balnarring there is Rain Hayne and Shine, officially a childrens farm with some wallabies, dingos and native birds. Then near Cape Schanck there is Ace Hi Ranch, who do advertise their fauna park. Losses on the Mornington Peninsula over the last 10 or so years are Arthurs Seat Fauna Park, Hastings Fauna Park (part of the caravan park that got swallowed in it's expansion), and Sorrento Aquarium. Going back further in time both Whistle Stop in Frankston and Leasureland Fair in Langwarrin had animals, while once there was a zoo in Rosebud that apparently held big cats.

Heading back towards the city, there is Munya Farm at Doveton, a council run facility that is mostly a childrens farm with some native birds, and Caribbean Gardens in Scorseby used to have animals in it's heyday, and may still have some. Heading eastwards along the Princess Hwy you come to Gumbuya Park at Tynong with it's extensive collection of pheasants and native animals.

How is that for a start?
 
Last edited:
How is that for a start?

I should add for down this way Bayles Fauna Park at .... Bayles. Kangaroos and emus, and a few deer. Plus bandicoots running free plus somebodys chickens last time I was there. Community run, it is basically a big fenced bush paddock, with an honesty box on the gate. For mutation lovers they had an interesting golden coat on their kangaroos.
 
Back
Top