I believe that this organisation could be revolutionary in many ways if well supported but it could take a long time for me to prove that! I am just one person against many critics.
Firstly you mention 'domesticating species' as one of your aims. I'm not sure this fits with your other statement of maintaining species for future re-release. You can't breed changes into an animal to make it a better pet and then justify that on conservation grounds.
Domestication projects have to be handled sensitively and COMPLETELY separately to the conservation projects. We cannot breed for genetic diversity AND domestication in the same programmes. However, species such as the Gambian Pouched Rat, a popular companion animal, would in my opinion benefit greatly from being domesticated as soon as possible. Not only does it make the bonding and handling of these rats easier, it means that less wild caught animals will be sold because they will only be sought after for new bloodlines. Who would have a wild 'pet' giant rat when you can have a domesticated one? This surely benefits both the species and people wishing to keep them.
I am not sure I understand your point entirely. Suffice to say I see no reason why this organisation cannot achieve both insurance populations AND domestication projects where the most popular species that are privately kept can be bred for tameness.
Going on from that, while I'm happy to see enthusiasts getting together to create breeding programs, I don't think the keeping of exotics as 'pets' is something to be encouraged.
The word 'pet' is not ideal (and i presume you refer to my campaign 'Pet4Life) but you have to understand that this organisation is pitched at serious, specialist keepers. The word 'pet' is used in a campaign aimed at casual alternative pet keepers.
I am not trying to encourage or promote exotic species as pets. Quite the opposite is true. I am trying to manage and control the trade in exotic pets as best I can by bringing breeders together in a common purpose.
Remember that the reason (so far as I can see it) that SO MANY animals are wild caught for the pet trade is because the animals that do come into the UK are not managed. They simply get sold via various outlets as pets with a portion that may end up with breeders. But then what? The breeders breed them, buy others which they THINK are unrelated. But are they?
These animals are bred according to popularity and if that wains then breeders stop bothering with that species which proceed to die out in the UK. Then they have to be imported all over again.
CENSR has the potential to stop all of this chaos. It can manage the private populations of animals coming into the UK so that people can choose to buy UK CB, not wild caught. Right now, you can often never know whether the animal you are buying is wild caught or not.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with people keeping exotic species privately. I understand your frustration as this is not regulated and animals needs are not always met. However, some private keepers can and do offer a better quality of life and better facilities for their charges than do some zoos. So it is not a case of promoting or quashing private keeping, I just believe it is a case of attempting to manage it.