elephantking
Well-Known Member
There are many indoor jungles in americas zoo's. Here are some of them please vote and post why u picked the exhibit
Jungleworld might be ok but what about the size of the jaguar enclosure, surely that's not impressive?
http://www.zoochat.com/547/bronx-zoo-jungle-world-41122/
-it is full f foliage so much you can never see the gibbons and they can intereact with many species including tapir
, if it were outdoors they could only use it half the year
Jungle World has Black Panthers (or Black Leopards) not Jaguars, it is part of Wild Asia so Jaguars would be out of place. The exhibit is small (I saw it recently) but far from the smallest I've seen.
Yeah sorry I knew they were black but forgot which type, but whatever they are I find the size of the area far to small for them and I felt really sad looking at them.
Sure there are also worse for big cats that I've seen, Berlin (East) for example.
I would say if it is that hard to see them it is not a good exhibit; it may or may not be keeping the gibbons well, but it's not exhibiting them well. For that you need to be able to see them!![]()
While Jungleworld's gibbon exhibit is large and densely vegetated, so that gibbons can and do occasionally disappear from sight, there are three separate viewing perspectives that surround the space, trails of artificial vines that are intermittently visible through openings in the canopy, and a "feeding tree" enrichment device, all of which make it pretty likely that you will see gibbons if you take the time to look for them. And the great thing is that when you do see them, you see gibbons as GIBBONS, fantastically adapted to life in a rainforest, not just as a a strange animal living in a cage with ropes (or on a small island with a nice mowed lawn and ropes), as is usually the case in most zoos. And compared with most of the other gibbon exhibits that do attempt to display them in a naturalistic setting, Jungleworld's attention to detail (accurate replications of Dipterocarp trees, lianas, arboreal ant nests, Raffelisias, eroded streambanks etc.) plus a great mix of other animal species, set it apart from the rest. It is hands-down the best gibbon exhibit I've ever seen, from both animal and public perspectives.
This is all fine (and I very much look forward to seeing Jungle World one day), but elephantking said it was a great exhibit because you 'never see the gibbons', which is to me clearly nonsense. If that were the case, it couldn't be a great exhibit. A great gibbon exhibit shows off the gibbons (and their natural behaviour) - which it can't if you never see them. That was my only point.
There is more to it than space. While Tierpark Berlin cages may be old (I haven't been there since 2004 so I'm not sure what it's like now) it does not equal being bad. Big cats have and do live long lives there, they wouldn't if they were not being taken care of.
I have no desire of turning this into yet another debate; there have been plenty of them already. The school of thought that more size equals more qualify of life for the animals is not one I agree with. There are numerous examples of animals only using a small portion of their exhibits. The most important thing is how they are taken care of.
Don't forget Dallas World Aquarium in downtown Dallas - with its huge indoor Amazon rainforest, river, and free-roaming birds, reptiles, and mammals.
Lied Jungle and it's not close for me, and yes I have been to JungleWorld.