Edinburgh Zoo Zoo at risk over animal welfare concerns

ZooLeopard

Well-Known Member
Zoo at risk over animal welfare concerns - Scotsman.com

SCOTLAND'S flagship zoo has been threatened with the removal of its operating licence after inspectors found it had failed to address a series of animal welfare and safety failings that date back at least five years.

In a major publicity coup, Edinburgh Zoo announced last month that it is to become the new home of two giant pandas from China as part of an international breeding programme.

But a highly critical inspectors' report from September- released under Freedom of Information legislation - reveals concerns that zoo managers had not acted upon previous advice on four key areas. They include the big cat enclosure, which was found to be in a state of disrepair; the sea lion enclosure where animals were reported to be suffering from eye infections; a main food store infested by vermin; and problems with the zoo's veterinary hospital.

The report notes that a potentially dangerous defect picked up during a previous inspection - after a small child had wriggled through a gap in the fence surrounding the rhino enclosure - had now been fixed by plugging the gap with potted plants.

But it adds that some of the problems raised after an earlier inspection by the Scottish Government in 2006 had still not been attended to during a follow up inspection by Edinburgh City Council last year.

Animal welfare campaigners yesterday insisted the zoo should not be spending millions of pounds on bringing pandas to Scotland while it was failing to meet some of its basic licence requirements.

In their report, sent to zoo bosses last September, the inspectors from Edinburgh City Council's community safety department express "disappointment" that there had been "very limited progress" on their concerns despite them being highlighted five years ago and with managers given a deadline of next year, when its licence is due for renewal, to complete the necessary work.

The report warns: "Unless some of this work is started soon it is difficult to see how the zoo will meet the 2012 deadline and therefore avoid the substantive risk of having restrictions imposed or the licence removed."

Following the 2006 report, the zoo was allowed to keep its licence as it explained it had plans to develop the zoo, which would lead to improvements.

Yet when it was inspected midway through the six-year licence period in 2009, inspectors again raised concerns that most of the issues had not been addressed.

The latest report, of last year, tells managers that improvements need to be made to the sea lion enclosure, which houses three Patagonian sea lions from Norway - Sofus, Miranda and Mona - as they needed frequent treatment for eye infections. The inspectors said: "The accommodation and water management for the sea lions must be brought up to modern standards, so as to include facilities for separation, isolation and restraint of the animals, and a high standard of water treatment and hygiene. An alternative strategy would be to cease to keep sea lions. Either way, this must be resolved within the lifetime of the current licence (which expires in 2012)"

The zoo was also told that parts of its big cat enclosures had not been repaired to "a satisfactory standard" and must be upgraded to ensure the safety of staff and the welfare of the cats. The veterinary area "remain unchanged from last year" except for the addition of more equipment and increased use, which had made problems identified earlier worse. The central food store also remained unchanged, allowing "ingress of rainwater and vermin". Stock and equipment was being stored on top of chill-cupboards "presenting hazards to staff in gaining access to, and working on, these storage areas".

Liz Tyson, director of the Captive Animals' Protection Society, which applied or the reports, said: "We would argue that the agreement to bring the pandas to the UK when a report from less than six months ago raised the same concerns as in 2006 is extremely worrying. This is particularly true when considering that the inspectors explicitly warn that it is difficult to see how the conditions of the licence will be met in time for the renewal in 2012."

Edinburgh Zoo's chief operating officer, Gary Wilson, said that managers were working with inspectors to complete the measures required. He added that many of the points noted in the 2009 report fell within an area due to be demolished as part of the zoo's masterplan, delayed due to planning issues and the dip in property values. The zoo was now implementing a £150,000 investment plan, agreed with by the inspectors. He said: "This investment is over and above the capital investment proposed for the giant panda project and we are 100 per cent confident that all conditions of the licence will be met before the current licence renewal."

The pandas, Tian Tian and Yangguang, are coming to Edinburgh as part of a breeding programme to safeguard the endangered animal, of which only 1,500 exist in the wild in China. The bears will be the first of their species to live in the UK for 17 years and the zoo is seeking commercial sponsors to help offset the potential multi-million-pound cost.
 
I suspect they may well stop keeping sea lions as to bring the current facility up to the standards required by the inspection would require a huge capital investment. Hope I am wrong.

As to comments of CAPS - who actually care what they think as they know nothing about animal welfare and husbandry; it was set -up by a veterinary nurse who opposed animals in entertainment - primarily circuses. However, they have moved on to criticise animals in zoos, aquariums and the exotic pet trade. Like Born Free they basically want all animal collection shut-down so their options should be viewed as being far from objective or impartial. :rolleyes:

The Scotsman seems to be taking the same dislike for Edinburgh Zoo as The Independent has for London Zoo - only the later had to print a correction for it's misreporting of a Zoo Inspection Report on ZSL.

I would consider the panda arriving at Edinburgh should give the much need boost in gate takings which should contribute to more improvements in the zoo's structure and plans. With the current economic climate I sadly think many other zoos and attractions will be having problems over the next few years.
 
They cannot continue ignoring to keep up the standards, therefore no wonder visitors turned back from visiting the zoo. They need to sort out their priorities to focus on improvements at the zoo to avoid the attendances' falling this season, otherwise they cannot afford the large overheads.
At last resort, the Head of Animals, Conservation and Education may need to go and should ask someone from Chester Zoo to jump in and rescue the sinking ship!
 
At last resort, the Head of Animals, Conservation and Education may need to go and should ask someone from Chester Zoo to jump in and rescue the sinking ship!

Sinking ship:confused:, i don't think so, yes the sea lions are still in their pool at the bottom of the zoo, but if push comes to shove and most importantly for the animals themselves, i am sure they will be moved if need be.
Edinburgh is on the verge of being flung into what after a few flat years could be a much needed period of financial stability for the zoo and wider society, with the arrival of the giant pandas.
Money may then become available to tackle the above mentioned issues.

BTW does anyone know or heard of a mixed penguin/Patagonian sea lion exhibit:rolleyes:
 
Sinking ship:confused:, i don't think so, yes the sea lions are still in their pool at the bottom of the zoo, but if push comes to shove and most importantly for the animals themselves, i am sure they will be moved if need be.
Edinburgh is on the verge of being flung into what after a few flat years could be a much needed period of financial stability for the zoo and wider society, with the arrival of the giant pandas.
Money may then become available to tackle the above mentioned issues.

BTW does anyone know or heard of a mixed penguin/Patagonian sea lion exhibit:rolleyes:

See what happened to London Zoo being faced with closure in the 1980s due to dwindling visitor numbers. Saved from a government endowment of £10 million made to the zoo in 1988.
The cost may need a few million pounds required to cover Edinburgh Zoo's backlog of repairs and to secure it's financial future. If these changes could prove to be sufficient to bring running costs down to manageable proportions.
 
Two thoughts.

1. Several years ago the National Zoo (Washington DC, USA) had similar criticisms. They hired a new director and got turned around and I am sure Scotland's main zoo can do the same.

2. Due to the enormous cost of getting giant pandas from China ($1 million US per year, not counting exhibit costs), no modern zoo has ever made money by having pandas. Even though visitor numbers increase, they do not increase enough to cover costs. Pandas are a losing proposition financially and making money is NOT why zoos now have them.
 
Two thoughts.

1. Several years ago the National Zoo (Washington DC, USA) had similar criticisms. They hired a new director and got turned around and I am sure Scotland's main zoo can do the same.

2. Due to the enormous cost of getting giant pandas from China ($1 million US per year, not counting exhibit costs), no modern zoo has ever made money by having pandas. Even though visitor numbers increase, they do not increase enough to cover costs. Pandas are a losing proposition financially and making money is NOT why zoos now have them.

I agree with secpnd part of this
I must admit after reading many reports on zoos who have had panda's in the past. hardly any if any at all have made any profit I have visited this zoo a few years ago and I really hope they can sort everything out but I feel over the next couple of years we may find a few more of our big zoo's looking for extra funding just to keep thier heads above water. With all the rising costs of food, electric, water rates, gas, labour costs and the lack of money for the general public to spend.
As has been said on here and other sites the next few years are going to be tough on family attractions in general so I think alot of the planned improvements not just here but at other zoo will be put on hold
 
Last edited:
Simply absurd. A few minor recommendations not (yet) acted upon, and it gets blown up out of all proportion by idiotic pressure groups and journalists who should know better. The sealion pool may not be ideal, but it's been pretty serviceable for just shy of a hundred years. Edinburgh Zoo in crisis? I don't think so. The improvements it has made over the past ten or so years, in terms of new exhibits, new species, and renovations to old exhibits, are as marked as the improvements at any zoo in the country.
 
My thoughts are split on this subject.
I only hope the Panda's arrival increases the gate receipts by such a huge amount that the rest of the Zoo benefits with investment, but the old phrase all the eggs in one basket springs to mind or even clutching at straws!!

Surely a fundemantal role of collections in this country is to reach a basic standard and the "Big Boys" of our zoos like Edinburgh should at least be aware of the power that failure to comply to Zoo inspection findings gives anyone with an axe to grind, an even sharper blade!!

I fear that many aquatic exhibits are not totally modern but that does not make them bad.

We look at an attraction from a base value and that is as a paying visitor.
We like Edinburgh (not the famous hill of course) but it is what it is.

The pot plant incident sounds like someone making a mountain out of a molehill, as I cannot name any collection we have visited where access to at least one exhibit is impossible.

I think don't panic, do the good housekeeping, invest every penny over the Panda costs wisely and we may well yet be able to let our great great great grandchildren visit in the future what is a Zoo with character and worth.
 
It sounds very like the problems Chessington encountered just a few years back with licencing and the Local Council, over the Gorilla housing etc. Weren't their sealions involved too?
 
This kind of bad publicity will more than likely spell the end of any possibility of finding a substantial sponsor for the panda's.
 
It sounds very like the problems Chessington encountered just a few years back with licencing and the Local Council, over the Gorilla housing etc. Weren't their sealions involved too?

The gorilla accommodation issue is still being addressed although I believe the new extension is finished. The fact the Chessington got bought out by Merlin complicated and delayed matters but was probably a good thing in the long-term from an animal welfare point of view with Merlin already being zoo owners.

It was always planned to add salt to the sea lion exhibit on recommendation from our veterinary consultants IZVG and I think the inspectors added that to the inspection report just to underline that they felt it would be a good idea. As I have said elsewhere eye health in seals and sea lions considerably improves in salt water and I know that Whipsnade salt their sea lion pool.

Not sure what the situation is now as I haven't been back there since I left in 2006 but plan to get across there this year to see friends and colleagues there.
 
Back
Top