I'm sorry but you can't compare a zoo to a zoo-theme park. The £81 was not for a zoo.
It is like comparing the price of a portion of chips to a portion of fish and chips.
Would make more sense if zoo-theme parks had different prices,with seperate entrances,i am sure more zoo folk would then visit these collections, thus adding to there yearly income.
I agree with you 100% on that fact, although separate entrances would probably not work because the majority of zoo-theme parks have the rides and animal exhibits mixed amongst each other. I think a wristband system would be useful so that people who have paid for the rides and zoo are given a wristband and these are checked by the ride supervisors. Have you written a letter to the park with your thoughts and suggestions?
I have just sent Flamingo land an email with my wristband idea and explaining that many people would just like to visit the zoo and are not prepared to pay for a theme park as well. Obviously 1 email from me is not going to make any difference but if a lots of zoo chatters get on board then they may pay attention.
But what about the people who are interested in the rides and not the animals? should they be offered a discount?
But what about the people who are interested in the rides and not the animals? should they be offered a discount?
To be honest its a miracle the zoo is there at all..because there was virtually no interest in it from what i could see.99% of people were there for the rides.I wouldnt worry about them if i were you Johnny.
If it was possible to do that then yes they should but unfortunately the layout of these kind of attractions would make this nearly impossible. It is possible to stop people getting on a ride but quite hard to stop people looking at a lion or walking past a giraffe.
Two days ago myself,my girlfriend and her 9-year old daughter had to pay a whopping £81 for the three of us to enter Flamingo Land! Is this a UK record for three people [including one child]?