Twycross Zoo Twycross Zoo News 2011 #2

I regret that so few UK zoos now keep orangs. We inhabit a strange country, where the biggest holder of gorillas on the planet has only spasmodic contact with joint collection planning, and everything else flows from that.

If JAF took over direction of the Western gorilla population in UK/Ireland, just how many other facilities would remain? I'd suggest Jersey, Dublin, Bristol; and Paignton's bachelor group is fulfilling an important function. I can't help thinking that the rest would be turned over to other great ape species.
 

Nice to see they have finally posted them,also interesting to note that 2 of the 3 trustess that supposedly resigned,during this year were both long standing and respected members of the TZA,which I for one don't find very strange at all!As for the financial side I will leave that for members of this forum far better qualified than me to comment on.
 
Visited today, very busy, but far more enjoyable to my last visit, I think I've worked out what to do now, if I just circle the outside of the zoo then it's a lovely place, avoid the inside monkey cells and it's fine (apart from the giraffe's area).

I got a question to anyone in the know, the tapir, what is that all about, why is she always amost impossible to see (no viewing apart from thru a window into her indoor pen)? However when I was driving out of the zoo, I just looked to my left and put my brakes on hard because there she was outside on the grass by the fence! She came up to me allowed a few snaps, sniffed my hand and then moved off! What a beautiful lady.
(dont know if she is a lady!).
So why have such a beautiful animal and then not display her for everyone to see?
 
I got a question to anyone in the know, the tapir, what is that all about, why is she always amost impossible to see (no viewing apart from thru a window into her indoor pen)? However when I was driving out of the zoo, I just looked to my left and put my brakes on hard because there she was outside on the grass by the fence! She came up to me allowed a few snaps, sniffed my hand and then moved off! What a beautiful lady.
(dont know if she is a lady!).
So why have such a beautiful animal and then not display her for everyone to see?

The malayan tapir is a she (madge), and basically her exhibit is like that due to the possibility of some sort of zoonotic virus which she may (and most of the UK population may) carry. This has also happened at london a few years back.

https://www.zoochat.com/community/posts/264815 - See after post 42
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK thanks for that, it would be nice if the zoo at least put a notice up explaining, or noted her existance.
So there isn't a test to see if she has a virus or not? And does she have to live her life out on her own?
 
She has been tested a few times I believe,after the first positive test with them all coming,back negative i know a few people are starting to think that the first test was a false positive,but the zoo is rightly being very cautious over it!
 
I was at the zoo on Saturday, and just assumed they didn't have any Malayan Tapirs any more.

That's a natural assumption. I was lucky that at first I saw her sleeping in her hut, then on the way out of the zoo there she was grazing in her paddock.
 
The figures make rather depressing reading . A £2 million plus bank loan was taken out to complete Himalaya and there were very low cash balances at the end of 2010 . The future aims sound good , I just hope they can be achieved .

Indeed, very depressing reading, there's a lot of positive "jam next year" talk but the 2010 figures are very far from good and there will have to be very significant improvements to survive and prosper.

As complex accounts can be difficult to interpret because it's not always possible to tell where numbers have been allocated or offset I'll just point out a handful of straightforward salient points:

1. Overall the organisation made a £667,480 loss (compared with a £349,640 profit the previous year);
2. This included a one-off grant from HSBC for £400,000;
3. Both sales and profit from "retail and catering" have fallen (profit down by £80,000) which I'd consider disappointing given Himalaya was open for a large part of the year;
4. The accounts proudly trumpet the fact that visitor spend on retail and catering has increased -it has, but less than 1% per visitor;
5. Amounts received via gift aid has fallen (by about £57,000) even though admissions have increased (by about £311,000) -this would seem to suggest that increased prices have resulted in more people refusing to pay the extra to qualify for gift aid or a significant change in the visitor mix;
6. Advertising and publicity increased by about £224,000 to £480,378, this increased total gate take by around £274,000 (whilst retail and catering take was down about £24,000);
7. Cash in bank has fallen by £1,261,837 to £185,895. In addition there is a £148,173 overdraft (none last year);
8. Total bank borrowings repayable in 2011 (including the above overdraft, which theoretically can increase ) is £333,251. Furthermore there is £860,261 repayable in 2012!
9. The accounts also state that a £750,000 loan facility has been arranged for 2011. It's conceivable, but not certain, that this may be used to cleared some of the other borrowings;
9. At the end of 2009, total bank borrowings were only £70,000.

Whilst there may be various reasons that profit and losses might fluctuate, the borrowings are a stone cold, sobering, immutable fact.

Basically it would appear that the zoo has taken a "speculate to accumulate" strategy and incurred significant borrowing to do so. In my opinion 2011 will be a "make or break year" and I look forward to seeing those accounts.

Finally, anyone with some knowledge of accountancy might be interested to know the accounts show net current liabilities of £666,366 where there were previously net current assets of £1,062,046.

Don't shoot the messenger!
 
Last edited:
Indeed, very depressing reading, there's a lot of positive "jam next year" talk but the 2010 figures are very far from good and there will have to be very significant improvements to survive and prosper.

As complex accounts can be difficult to interpret because it's not always possible to tell where numbers have been allocated or offset I'll just point out a handful of straightforward salient points:

1. Overall the organisation made a £667,480 loss (compared with a £349,640 profit the previous year);
2. This included a one-off grant from HSBC for £400,000;
3. Both sales and profit from "retail and catering" have fallen (profit down by £80,000) which I'd consider disappointing given Himalaya was open for a large part of the year;
4. The accounts proudly trumpet the fact that visitor spend on retail and catering has increased -it has, but less than 1% per visitor;
5. Amounts received via gift aid has fallen (by about £57,000) even though admissions have increased (by about £311,000) -this would seem to suggest that increased prices have resulted in more people refusing to pay the extra to qualify for gift aid or a significant change in the visitor mix;
6. Advertising and publicity increased by about £224,000 to £480,378, this increased total gate take by around £274,000 (whilst retail and catering take was down about £24,000);
7. Cash in bank has fallen by £1,261,837 to £185,895. In addition there is a £148,173 overdraft (none last year);
8. Total bank borrowings repayable in 2011 (including the above overdraft, which theoretically can increase ) is £333,251. Furthermore there is £860,261 repayable in 2012!
9. The accounts also state that a £750,000 loan facility has been arranged for 2011. It's conceivable, but not certain, that this may be used to cleared some of the other borrowings;
9. At the end of 2009, total bank borrowings were only £70,000.

Whilst there may be various reasons that profit and losses might fluctuate, the borrowings are a stone cold, sobering, immutable fact.

Basically it would appear that the zoo has taken a "speculate to accumulate" strategy and incurred significant borrowing to do so. In my opinion 2011 will be a "make or break year" and I look forward to seeing those accounts.

Finally, anyone with some knowledge of accountancy might be interested to know the accounts show net current liabilities of £666,366 where there were previously net current assets of £1,062,046.

Don't shoot the messenger!

Yes it does unfortunately make depressing reading,profits from the retailing are LESS , after the great expense of building Himalaya which was open for most of this trading year, one encouraging thing I did notice, however, is that they still maintain a healthy figure of approximately 500,000 visitors a year although I think I am correct in stating that admission prices are about double what they were ten years ago, taking into consideration inflation and V.A.T. increases this is still a large increase, I also noted that they would like to build up a cash reserve of three million pounds in case the zoo has to close due to foot and mouth disease or any other reason, therefore am I to assume that, god forbid, the zoo had to close due to foot and mouth, as it did for a month in 2001, there is currently no money in the bank to tide them over this period of no income, the zoo did not get any compensation from the government last time to compensate them for their financial loss, so how would they feed the animals and pay the wages if this situation arose again?, very precarious.
 
I also noted that they would like to build up a cash reserve of three million pounds in case the zoo has to close due to foot and mouth disease or any other reason, therefore am I to assume that, god forbid, the zoo had to close due to foot and mouth, as it did for a month in 2001, there is currently no money in the bank to tide them over this period of no income, the zoo did not get any compensation from the government last time to compensate them for their financial loss, so how would they feed the animals and pay the wages if this situation arose again?, very precarious.

Given that when foot and mouth last hit the zoo could have stayed shut for,I believe well over 12 months before it would be in need of money,the fact that they now have no reserve,is just terrible.I knew the zoo was not looking good but too me the picture is now looking alot worse than I feared it was.
 
I've just noticed, per the website, that Twycross charges for children under three years of age to enter the zoo. Whilst it is only £1 it's something I've never noticed at a zoo before. Is this unique in UK zoos?

What's next? Being charged to "spend a penny"?
 
Last edited:
What's next? Being charged to "spend a penny"?

Or to spend 30 cents under the gaze of a stern toilet monitor lady if you're at a German zoo...


;)
 
I've just noticed, per the website, that Twycross charges for children under three years of age to enter the zoo. Whilst it is only £1 it's something I've never noticed at a zoo before. Is this unique in UK zoos?

What's next? Being charged to "spend a penny"?

Probably, but at least you can look at the aviary while you are "spending it":)
 
Or to spend 30 cents under the gaze of a stern toilet monitor lady if you're at a German zoo...


;)

To be honest I was expecting that reply from someone:)

I wonder what'd happen if someone's waters broke during a visit and a baby was delivered, would they be asked to pay an extra pound?:D
 
To be honest I was expecting that reply from someone:)

I wonder what'd happen if someone's waters broke during a visit and a baby was delivered, would they be asked to pay an extra pound?:D

Current admission charges for children at other British zoos, London and Whipsnade under 3 free admission, Chester 2 and under free, Edinburgh under 3 free, Colchester under 3 free, Blackpool under 3 free, Twycross biting the hand that feeds its animals.
 
Back
Top