Probably, for anyone that can count!![]()
Not necessarily clever-clogs
Probably, for anyone that can count!![]()
Not necessarily clever-clogsThey could just look like 8!
I was only pointing out that if anyone had looked in the tank, they would have seen 3-5 sharks, so the number of sharks would be obvious.![]()
I was only pointing out that if anyone had looked in the tank, they would have seen 3-5 sharks, so the number of sharks would be obvious.![]()
I once heard a child (of about 7) ask her mom why there were so many different types of monkeys. The mother’s response was “because there are so many different types of people.” And they say we don’t need to teach evolution in our public schools!
I once heard a child (of about 7) ask her mom why there were so many different types of monkeys. The mother’s response was “because there are so many different types of people.” And they say we don’t need to teach evolution in our public schools!
It's worth remembering, when getting outraged, the general level of literacy is not what one would expect!
Whoa Nanoboy and Maguari, you guys are blowing my mind! Are you saying without people measuring, observing and naming plants and animals the whole construct of species is moot? It's like the name of the rose and, if a tree fell in the woods; all rolled into one!![]()
Frankly all the more reason to be outraged, just in a different direction... no-one should be allowed to reach school leaving age unable to cope with an unfamiliar five-letter word.
From my limited exposure in recent years I've noticed literacy teaching seems to be tending towards a letter-by-letter approach rather than taking words or syllables at a time, and I'm sure this isn't actually helping long-term, as it slows reading down and makes a new word a more complicated prospect - T-A-P-I-R then think how to say it rather than TAP-IR which deals with the sound of the world as you go along (you may not get the pronunciation right first time, but you'll get the word out). Just an interested layman's view, but it pains me seeing adults still spelling words out letter-by-letter.
Anywho, wildly off-topic and I could be well wide of the mark so I'll stop there.
The main function of taxonomy is to allow us to get our head around the diversity out there, but it's unlikely to ever present it definitively.
I do very much agree with this statement. I am also pleasantly surprised our conversation has taken such a philosphical turn. My original intent for the post was to express my discontent for the appauling state of science education in the Untied States. I think we are now touching on material worth a whole new thread.
I wouldn't mind a punkish goth chick wearing a tail talking to me when I was at the zoo.....
(....I think I may have said too much)