Latin Names

chimpman

Well-Known Member
10+ year member
Has anyone out there ever read or owned a copy of Latin Names Explained: a Guide to the Scientific Classification of Reptiles, Birds & Mammals written by A. F. Gotch and published in 1996 by Facts on File (ISBN 9780816033775). I want to know what the contents of the book are before I decide to buy it.
 
I have the volumes on reptiles and mammals (they were originally published as 3 separate volumes). It is basically a dictionary of animal names and a brief explanation on their origin.
 
I always wondered how Latin names were chosen for species. Who chooses the name? Who approves it? If you discover it, can you really name the species after yourself?
 
Can't name an species after yourself, but you can name it after friends and relatives or celebrities. But, if you describe the species, you get to name it in the published literature.
 
I always wondered how Latin names were chosen for species. Who chooses the name? Who approves it? If you discover it, can you really name the species after yourself?
when a scientist describes a new species (i.e. publishes a description of it in a scientific journal) he/she/they choose the name for the species. The language isn't always Latin (lots of "Latin" names are actually derived from ancient Greek for example) but it is always latinised. There is a commitee called the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) [see here: http://iczn.org/]who have final say on all nomenclatural issues. There is a similar body for describing plants.

Basically you can name an animal in any way you want or after any feature (e.g. colour, range, shape, after real people, after mythical characters, etc etc), although some names will be disallowed for various reasons. In the past certain zoologists have named animals after themselves but it is not the done thing. You can certainly name it after any other person you want to. Quite often the person/people describing the species aren't the ones who discovered it, so they can name it after the discoverer.


You'll probably like this site: Curiosities of Biological Nomenclature
 
Last edited:
Has anyone out there ever read or owned a copy of Latin Names Explained: a Guide to the Scientific Classification of Reptiles, Birds & Mammals written by A. F. Gotch and published in 1996 by Facts on File (ISBN 9780816033775). I want to know what the contents of the book are before I decide to buy it.
I would certainly recommend it, but it does depend on what you want it for.

As jbnbsn99 says, it is basically a dictionary of scientific names.

It will say something like Woodfordia maculata: genus named after Arthur Woodford who discovered the first specimen in 1894 in his underpants while relieving himself in the upper Amazon Basin. Species maculata from Latin "spotted"

(That's just made up of course, but you get the general idea).
 
when a scientist describes a new species (i.e. publishes a description of it in a scientific journal) he/she/they choose the name for the species. The language isn't always Latin (lots of "Latin" names are actually derived from ancient Greek for example) but it is always latinised. There is a commitee called the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) [see here: http://iczn.org/] who have final say on all nomenclatural issues. There is a similar body for describing plants.

Basically you can name an animal in any way you want or after any feature (e.g. colour, range, shape, after real people, after mythical characters, etc etc), although some names will be disallowed for various reasons. In the past certain zoologists have named animals after themselves but it is not the done thing. You can certainly name it after any other person you want to. Quite often the person/people describing the species aren't the ones who discovered it, so they can name it after the discoverer.


You'll probably like this site: Curiosities of Biological Nomenclature

Thanks for the reply and the websites. The curious taxonomy is indeed quite hilarious. I wonder what that says about my sense of humour? :D

According to the ICZN:
""First of all you need to identify a new species, found either in the field or in a museum, and support that identification of its uniqueness using data on the morphology (physical features) or genetics. The species needs to be clearly, repeatedly different from other species that it might be related to.

You then publish the findings in a scientific journal, ideally one that is peer-reviewed. This means that other specialists subject your work to critical scrutiny, improving the scientific reliability all around.

At this point you can give it a name, that you feel reflects well on the discovery - naming it for a special feature, for the place it occurs, or in honour of someone you respect. If you publish it according to the rules, the name sticks for perpetuity."

Dr Ellinor Michel, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature"

Historically, there must have been some pretty funny stories about naming disputes between rival scientists, and even scientists within the same research group.

It also reminds me of a scene from the movie 'Armageddon' when the guy first discovers a huge asteroid on a collision course with earth and calls NASA:

Karl: Sir, I'm retired navy, I know all about classified. But one more thing. The person that finds her gets to name her right?
Dan: Yes-yes that's right, that's right.
Karl: I wanna name her Dottie after my wife. She's a vicious life-sucking bitch from which there is no escape.

:D:D
 
I have the volumes on reptiles and mammals (they were originally published as 3 separate volumes). It is basically a dictionary of animal names and a brief explanation on their origin.

I would certainly recommend it, but it does depend on what you want it for.

As jbnbsn99 says, it is basically a dictionary of scientific names.

It will say something like Woodfordia maculata: genus named after Arthur Woodford who discovered the first specimen in 1894 in his underpants while relieving himself in the upper Amazon Basin. Species maculata from Latin "spotted"

(That's just made up of course, but you get the general idea).
Thanks for the information about this book/book series. I’m glad I asked rather than just buying it/them. It isn’t what I wanted so it would have been a disappointment when they arrived if I’d just ordered them.
 
Where scientific names originate is, in itself, an interesting subject. That wasn't, though, what I was trying to find. I had put some keywords into search on Amazon. It came up with this series of books. The type of book I was seeking is one on scientific names. There are, as I'm sure you know, a set of internationally agreed conventions on scientific names. For example, that they are printed in italic script, they must be Latin or latinised words, etc. I do know about scientific names. I think the only thing I am not sure about is how we pronounce scientific names. I just wanted to get a book about scientific names even though I don't actually have a need for one.
 
These books are great for learning scientific names. What you are really looking for though, is a book on taxonomy or the history of taxonomy.
 
In what way are they good for learning scientific names? Do you mean learning for example that Pan paniscus is the scientific name for the bonobo? Alternatively, do you mean it would explain how this species acquired its scientific name?

I suppose, yes, it could be a book on taxonomy; however, my interest would certainly include the broader subject of systematics.
 
They give a little one paragraph or so explanation and origin of each name.
 
Back
Top