Rhea shot dead WHY?

adrian1963

Well-Known Member
From the telegraph this week -

A female rhea called Chris has been shot dead by a gamekeeper after a month on the run in the Hertfordshire countryside, the Daily Telegraph has reported.

The 6ft-tall ostrich-like creature had become a regular visitor to the Barkway Park Golf Club near Royston but was killed by deer manager Stuart Howe with police fearing the rapid runaway was a potential traffic hazard.

The rhea had escaped from the home of her owner Jo Clarke, who told the Telegraph she was angry the bird had been shot dead despite giving up hope of her returning.

"I knew this would happen in the end. But there was no need to shoot her," Mrs Clarke said, criticising claims the sharp-clawed rhea posed a threat to the public.

"She was never going to hurt anyone," she added. "All this stuff about them ripping a man's arm off with their claw is nonsense.

"They are very shy and like to eat weeds. She would just have run away if you approached her."

Golfers had apparently become happily accustomed to seeing the different kind of birdy on their course over the past few weeks.

"The golfers here sort of adopted it and used to enjoy seeing it grazing near the golf course," club captain Mike Rodgers told the newspaper.

"We were quite fond of the bird. It was never a particular nuisance and kept well away from golfers."

Mr Rodgers added: "It’s sad that someone had to shoot it, but if it was a traffic hazard, I understand that."

Mr Howe, who shot the rhea on Monday, told the newspaper it would not have been possible to capture the bird. He said the rhea meat would be used to make gourmet sausages.


My question is WHY?

And please don't quote the obvious traffic problems because in that case shouldn't we get game keepers to SHOOT the following for the same reason's

Dogs, Cats, Deer, Cattle, Sheep, Horses, Ducks, Geese, Swans, Foxes, Rabbits, Badgers and even People on the Rhea front as quoted by the golfers it WASN'T causing any problems.
 
Simple answer as so often to my mind- lies with the sensationalistic press reporting of "how it could disembowel a man with it's six inch claws". Once people read things like - that any thing is doomed, in the name of health and safety it must be destroyed.

As the average person can't tell a pigeon from a crow a "deadly" bird has no chance the last one who escaped in Suffolk was shot by the RSPCC with a tranqualiser dart and died
this one a game keeper

I may be wrong here but i didn't think birds could be tranquilized with dart guns I always believed the bone/lung structures didn't allow the tranqualiser to work I thought they needed to be sedated with gas. Am i wrong? http://www.zoochat.com/editpost.php?do=editpost&p=769633
 
Last edited:
Because they could not catch her, she was a traffic hazard because drivers would not be used to seeing a rhea in a field and could be distracted by looking at her.
 
Because they could not catch her, she was a traffic hazard because drivers would not be used to seeing a rhea in a field and could be distracted by looking at her.

I wonder if they thought of driving it into, or encircling it with nets? Too much bother to organise?
 
No, more like 4 feet tall.

There's a big difference in ratites between normal standing posture, and when they draw themselves up to their full height....often when threatened. So yes, a rhea could quite feasibly reach 6', just as a big male ostrich can easily reach 10'.
 
... Are there many cases of a rhea attacking anyone? I've heard of cassowaries and ostriches going after people, but never a rhea.
 
... Are there many cases of a rhea attacking anyone? I've heard of cassowaries and ostriches going after people, but never a rhea.

I keept rheas in the past and they are not agressive at all, they are very shy and preffer to stay away from people! Males can get a litle bit "nervous" during breeding season but is just that...nothing compared to cassowaries and ostriches.
 
I wonder if they thought of driving it into, or encircling it with nets? Too much bother to organise?

People within the decision making process are often clueless (that includes magistrate, council and police and a vet service which has never dealt with anything but domestics or pets).

This incident is a prime example of how bureaucrats often seem to decide animal welfare issues, the fate of a wild / exotic species and how not to go about doing wildlife management or animal capture.

I would say leave it up to the experts ...
 
Whenever the media reported that the rhea had ‘6-inch claws capable of disembowelling a human’, I couldn’t help but wonder if they were getting rheas confused with cassowaries?
 
Whenever the media reported that the rhea had ‘6-inch claws capable of disembowelling a human’, I couldn’t help but wonder if they were getting rheas confused with cassowaries?

Based upon this weekend's Aescalupian Snake story, I wouldn't be surprised if the UK media were getting rheas confused with Velociraptor....:rolleyes:
 
Based upon this weekend's Aescalupian Snake story, I wouldn't be surprised if the UK media were getting rheas confused with Velociraptor....:rolleyes:

Interesting you should mention that … the size of Velociraptor is a far cry from the models used in Jurassic Park. So, we have Steven Spielberg and non-investigative journos to blame for this whole debacle.
 
Back
Top