San Antonio Zoo San Antonio Zoo News 2015

judging on first impression photos this exhibit looks like a sad rush of an exhibit in an attempt to pull in attendance.. They really overdid themselves with this single stall "hut", they even added a mounted fan. I understand giraffe are warm climate animals and TX is pretty warm but this is just sad.

Giraffes Debut at San Antonio Zoo - Online - November 2015

The exhibit doesn't look that different from what was there when I visited the zoo in 2010, thus adding to a long line of subpar enclosures at San Antonio Zoo. Also, the article mentions an emu but is that true or did the writer mean to say ostrich?
 
It appears to be the same barn as before, but with extensive landscaping changes.
 
Yes it appears it is the same zebra/antelope/ostrich yard that was always there (and also held giraffes in the past). They just dug out one corner and put in a cement watering hole as far as I can tell. Plus a substandard giraffe barn that I have a hard time believing meets AZA standards. Paging David Brown for clarification...
 
Yes it appears it is the same zebra/antelope/ostrich yard that was always there (and also held giraffes in the past). They just dug out one corner and put in a cement watering hole as far as I can tell. Plus a substandard giraffe barn that I have a hard time believing meets AZA standards. Paging David Brown for clarification...

Giraffe barn from August 16th, 2010:

http://www.zoochat.com/603/giraffe-barn-199119/

Here is an image of the exhibit at that time:

http://www.zoochat.com/603/topi-ostrich-marabou-stork-exhibit-199105/

Another photo of the "Savanna":

http://www.zoochat.com/603/topi-ostrich-marabou-stork-exhibit-199118/
 
I'm going tomorrow to see what it's like (school is a drag, can't go today). Their website mentions giraffes, zebras, and assorted birds and hoof stock. A video by a local news station mentions Thomson's gazelles, cranes (probably grey or black crowned), and ostriches. The concept art on their website shows zebras, and they appear to be Hartmann's mountain zebras, but as it is concept art, nobody can know. I never received a response from the zoo on what the assorted hoof stock was, but someone mentioned that they emailed the zoo and topi was one of them. Topi is still listed in their list of animals. I can be hopeful, right? I will be writing a review and have photos within the next few days (yay for first review).
 
I visited today, and I'm disappointed to say that it looks to me like it is, indeed, a rushed and underwhelming job. The barn is the same as the old one that Snow Leopard pictured above. It's been remodeled somewhat - now the windows are much, much bigger and you can see the giraffes inside from a fair distance away. There's some new landscaping that has, as reported above, added a water hole. The water hold and the landscaping look pretty nice, really, so I don't mean to sound like I'm complaining about them.

My biggest gripe is that the platform they've built for people to stand on to feed the giraffes also contains, of all things, a pretty big new picnic area. I'm not good at guessing area, and the fact that I'm a little put off by the whole thing might be causing me to think it's worse than it really is (I really am sorry if that's making this report unreliabe), but it sure looks like it's almost a quarter of the land that was once the 'savannah' that Snow Leopard has pictured above. I've always thought this zoo had more than enough cafes and restaurant areas, and now the savannah exhibit is much, much smaller than it was before. I know the zoo is hard up for money and feeding giraffes will bring in some good business, but I'm sad to see the endeavor shrink the size of this exhibit by so much. I was really pretty disappointed when I saw it.

For a long time now, I've been hoping that the area that's now the savannah/giraffe exhibit would be merged with the next-door elephant exhibit to make a better sized (and more up-to-date) exhibit for elephants, which is what I heard a few keepers saying was a possibility a few years ago. But the new giraffe feeding/picnic area platform looks like it's been designed to be pretty permanent, so I guess that idea is long gone. I guess the larger elephant exhibit thing would have cost too much anyway. I know most zoos are hard up for money.

Sorry for whining so much, and sorry if I've made it sound worse than it is. I don't mean to be alarmist. I grew up in San Antonio and feel a pretty strong nostalgic connection to the zoo. I was really excited to see Africa Live Part 1, and was hoping to see future changes to the zoo meet a similar standard of quality. But Africa Live part 2 seemed strangely cluttered and poorly thought out, then the zoo took up a pretty enormous area with another restaurant and a carousel (not bad things, just expensive things that don't improve exhibits), and has concentrated its efforts since then on repainting buildings in garish colors before concocting this bizarre giraffe encounter. I'm sure it's not as bad as I've made it out to be, but it sure seems frustrating.

Back on topic. According to the news this morning, they're going to reintroduce the other animals - plains zebras, topi, ostrich - after the giraffes have gotten used to their new environment. The zebras are currently living in what was the larger of the two rhino enclosures.

Anyway, sorry to babble so much.
 
According to some docents (who unfortunately did not seem very knowledgeable, and barely knew they had reticulated giraffes instead of another species), there will be 10 species when all have been introduced. I do not know the exact species list, but as confirmed is: reticulated giraffe, grant's zebra, Thomson's gazelle, topi, ostrich, and cranes. They mentioned "lots of cranes" so that makes me think of east and west African. However, the zoo also holds wattled, blue, and demoiselle cranes which are all native to Africa. Marabou storks are a possibility as well. When I mentioned hartebeest, the man also agreed but I have trouble believing that he knew what a hartebeest was. What other species might they add?
 
I visited Monday and thought the new giraffe exhibit was just to get attendance. They said it would be completely open even though they were still working on the feeding area and giraffes weren't even allowed in the yard as they were by their house with a gate separating them from the main area. The pool is ok, but it doesn't make up for the lack of trees (The trees they had looked more like decoration than for the giraffes). I was quite disappointed with the exhibit, and even though this is the zoo I grew up going to, this exhibit is just a rush and not worth the money. I hope that the zoo can rebuild and get back on track. Don't hate on me just stating my opinion.
-BossMayhem250
 
I visited Monday and thought the new giraffe exhibit was just to get attendance. They said it would be completely open even though they were still working on the feeding area and giraffes weren't even allowed in the yard as they were by their house with a gate separating them from the main area. The pool is ok, but it doesn't make up for the lack of trees (The trees they had looked more like decoration than for the giraffes). I was quite disappointed with the exhibit, and even though this is the zoo I grew up going to, this exhibit is just a rush and not worth the money. I hope that the zoo can rebuild and get back on track. Don't hate on me just stating my opinion.
-BossMayhem250

I figured the same, on the attendance thing. Giraffe feeding is now incredibly common in US zoos and I'm sure it makes a good amount of money. (feeding giraffes is pretty cool, and to my knowledge there's not much risk to the guests or the animals, so long as there is proper supervision, at least) Giraffes are popular on their own, but the feeding alone is sure to entice a lot of people to visit.

I care about the zoo too, but yeah, some of their decisions can be a little frustrating. I guess they're pretty hard up on funds right now, so they're focused more on profitable ventures. I suppose I can't criticize 'em for it, but still, it would be nice if they worked on having nicer exhibits.
 
I figured the same, on the attendance thing. Giraffe feeding is now incredibly common in US zoos and I'm sure it makes a good amount of money. (feeding giraffes is pretty cool, and to my knowledge there's not much risk to the guests or the animals, so long as there is proper supervision, at least) Giraffes are popular on their own, but the feeding alone is sure to entice a lot of people to visit.

I care about the zoo too, but yeah, some of their decisions can be a little frustrating. I guess they're pretty hard up on funds right now, so they're focused more on profitable ventures. I suppose I can't criticize 'em for it, but still, it would be nice if they worked on having nicer exhibits.

It may not hold the world class exhibitry, but given the meagre funding and locality SAZ remains a fine establishment. If the big zoos would be faced with similar financial constraints they would certainly not do any better ...
 
I'm really hoping that we can get funds before Lucky passes, so we have enough money to build a new elephant exhibit and rhino exhibits. The rhino exhibit is not that bad, but the rhino tears up the grass every time they replant it or it dies, the rhino seems like he could be on the verge of passing as well. The system they had with the gates made sense but now with the lone rhino, it doesn't matter anymore, and takes up space. I'm also wondering if apes will ever return to the zoo, the gorilla just didn't fit in and the exhibit wasn't the best. The zoo could easily make itself a top zoo with good exhibits coming (Africa Live III) and with the first 2 phases of Africa Live being fairly successful and good exhibits, it would be nice to cap it off with a finishing touch.
 
Yes, it certainly needs funding but I can see it getting much better. I feel that if they were to redo anything (besides elephant and rhino habitats) that it should be Amazonia. There is too much chain link in it.
 
Back
Top