I enjoyed a visit to Dudley yesterday. My previous one was so disappointing that I waited more than 20 years before returning.
It was nice to see so many of the Tecton buildings restored and I thought that the quality of the new exhibits was very good. There is still plenty of room for improvement, but things are obviously on the right course.
Dudley is unique among British zoos because it is set on a hill with a ruined mediaeval castle at the summit. I thought that the new Castle Creatures display used this setting imaginatively, and although the zoological content is limited, the strong historical context must give it extra appeal to children. When I watched the end of the bird of prey display in the castle courtyard, it occurred to me that falconry is a splendid and appropriate use for this green space (the castle ruins are Grade I listed buildings of course, so there is very little more they can do there). I like the way the zoo is playing to its strengths, and the revamped chairlift is another example of this: although I have no head for heights and you'd never get me to go up in one of those

I also liked the Monkey Tails exhibit, although I only glimpsed two titis and a saki, the space for larger reptiles was welcome and I forgave the second dose of meerkats

. The chimp exhibit is fine, although the outdoor area would benefit from some shrubbery - but it is weird to watch a group of chimps wandering around in total silence: I presume this is because the chimps are an all-female group, with no excitable males or exuberant youngsters. It just felt quite wrong to me.
My favourite exhibit was the lemur walk-through; very often these displays are quite bare with poor views of the lemurs, but Dudley's is lush and leafy with animals appearing and disappearing apparently quite unconcerned by the human visitors. I said to the keeper that I could hear the ring-tailed lemurs in the foliage, but I could only see the occasional tail or limb which was nice because it reminded me of looking for guenons in an African forest.
Some of the older exhibits are still good. It was nice to see the flock of Barbary sheep looking well in their old enclosure and the sea lions make a good show, as the bull is a very impressive animal. I like the reptile house and the penguins too. I think the birds are the weakest part of the collection, some of the aviaries look rather scruffy and the choice of species seems fairly random. It is obvious that a lot of thought and money has been put into the new entrance area, making a very good initial impression, which is diminished down by the first exhibit - a small pool with eight flamingos (of two different species) - time travel straight back to the '60s

Two final comments. I remember the old Ape House as it was 40 years ago and so I do know how much has been done to improve it, but I don't think it is up to standard for adult orangs now. It would be fine for macaques or mandrills, but I don't think there is enough space or stimulation for orangs. I know a new building would be expensive, but it would be my top priority. Linked to this, all the buildings and houses seemed very dark inside, it was very hard to see the orangs at all when they were inside. The same was true of the chimps, the dens of big cats and even Monkey Tails. Perhaps the dull weather made this seem worse than it was, or perhaps the Monsoon Forest has raised my expectations of what an indoor display can look like.
Alan