Asian Small-clawed Otters wild in the UK?

Chlidonias

Moderator
Staff member
15+ year member
While looking up some other material, I happened to come across a surprising note on the IUCN page for Small-clawed Otter saying "Introduced: United Kingdom (Great Britain)". The reference for this was Jefferies, D.J. 1989. The Asian short clawed otter Amblonyx cinerea (Illiger) living wild in Britain. Otters (Earsham) 2(3): 21-25; and Jefferies, D.J. 1991. Another record of an Asian short-clawed otter living free in Oxford with notes on its implications. Journal of the Otter Trust 2(5): 9-12.

This took me somewhat by surprise because to my recollection I had never heard of this before. I had a quick google and found the following article from 1996.
Asian otters thrive in chilly Oxford river | The Independent
Britain has a new species of carnivore, living and breeding in the wild. But farmers and country folk can take comfort: this is no sheep-eating Beast of Bodmin. The Asian short-clawed otter, found from India eastwards to Borneo and Java, has established itself on rivers and canals near Oxford after escaping from captivity. Sightings over 10 years have satisfied naturalists that a small population has managed to breed successfully.

Unlike the semi-mythical carnivores of Bodmin and Dartmoor, there is proof of this creature's existence. The bodies of two of the otters have been found, killed by cars as they tried to cross roads.

The otter, which is half the size of its British counterpart and has a noticeable "tidemark" running from eye to ear, is the latest in a long line of creatures to have gone native after being introduced by man and deliberately or accidentally released. The list includes the rabbit, brought to Britain by the Normans, the grey squirrel, introduced as a pet in the 19th century, and several species of deer, including muntjac, sika, Pere Davids and Chinese water deer.

More recent escapees include wallabies in the Peak District, mink, which went native in Devon in the Fifties after being farmed for their fur and now number 100,000, and coypu, which arrived in Britain in theThirties and were exterminated because of the damage they caused to drainage systems in East Anglia.

Despite stronger controls on the keeping of wild animals, exotic pets are more popular than ever before and wildlife parks have proliferated, leading many naturalists to fear that more alien species are moving into the countryside. One theory is that the short-clawed otter may have escaped from a park owned by the Virgin Airlines boss, Richard Branson.

The short-clawed otter's successful establishment in the wild has taken conservationists by surprise. Don Jefferies, Britain's foremost otter expert, said: "It is a tropical species so we thought they probably would not breed. However, what happens if we have another really cold winter, like 1962-63, is another matter."

The first hint of an escape came in the early Eighties, when a local resident told Dr Jefferies that otters were breeding again in the Upper Thames Valley and sent him a photograph of one on a log to prove it. The native otter had become locally extinct in the Seventies because of hunting and the use of organochlorine pesticides. When Dr Jefferies measured the log, and compared it with the otter in the picture, he decided it was the much smaller Asian species.

Reports since then, including two of otters killed on the roads in 1986 and 1991, suggest that three or four generations of otters may have bred in the wild.

According to Dr Jefferies, the escape of the short-clawed otter and its breeding success have provided an "unplanned experiment" in water cleanliness, proving that the waters of the Thames were "sufficiently unpolluted to allow inhabitation by otters of whatever species and that [the native otter] was absent solely because there was none left to occupy the area".

However, a report to be published later this month by the Vincent Wildlife Trust shows that the native otter is now returning to many areas from which it has been absent for several decades, and threatening to push the Asian otter from its new-found ecological niche.

In Asia the two species of otter co-exist by eating different foods - the bigger species eats fish, the smaller one insects - or occupying different parts of a river system. However, Dr Jefferies believes the British otter, as it returns, may either kill its smaller rival or force it into less hospitable waterways, making it much harder for it to survive.

Several other exotic species of pet, including porcupines, gerbils and hamsters, established a foothold in the wild in Britain but died out or were exterminated later. Mongolian gerbils were released by a film company on the Isle of Wight in the early Seventies and colonies of golden hamsters have appeared in Bootle, Bury St Edmunds and Barnet. American red-eared terrapins and bullfrogs are among the latest intruders.

Dr Jefferies added: "Every time an alien species escapes there are people who talk about how useful it might be. They said the coypu might keep vegetation under control, for instance. Instead it chomped its way through long rows of sugar beet and made colossal holes in the banks. There is not one alien introduction I can think of that doesn't cause a problem. If the Asian short-clawed otter did disappear, I would not regret it."


Then I found a 2008 pdf entitled "The status of scarce non-native birds and mammals in England" with the following:
Since first being recorded in the wild in 1981, there were regular but infrequent sightings of short-clawed otters, up to the mid 1990s. The principal locations for sightings were the rivers and canals around Oxford; although others have been in Bath and Kent. On two occasions an adult was observed with cubs. Following the 1990s, there has been a lack of records in the Thames Valley region. It has been suggested that the reintroduction and recovery of native otters Luta lutra may have resulted in the killing or displacement of local short-clawed otters (Strachan & Jeffries 1996 and Jeffries 2003 cited in Baker & Hills 2008). This was regarded as likely as the recovering otter population was considered to have eliminated the local mink population within two years (Jeffries 2003 cited in Baker & Hills 2008).

And thus an interesting tale came to an end. Or do the Small-clawed Otters still live there, and the locals are assuming they are just Common Otters...?
 
An otter is an otter so its very probable that the asian could maintain some small pocket populations without detection by locals; remembering that most people can go their whole lives without seeing a live otter and that even most studies rely upon evidence of activity instead of actual live sightings.

Many people have trouble telling a cheetah from a leopard so an asian from a native otter would be beyond most for a sighting in the wild; though I suspect most could readily see the differences if they were placed side by side.

For me this highlights the problem with non-natives in todays world; we might identify them but unless they pose a threat or cause a serious problem they can go ignored without much attention and no drive to remove from the wild. Of course once a species is found to be highly invasive initial small populations can quickly expand to numbers which prove to be expensive to then remove
 
I'm surprised to read that the reintroduction of Lutra lutra might help to decrease the local mink population. We have populations of both (as well as various other small mammalian predators) living along one another where I live, and so far I haven't heard anything from the local biologists that could confirm this assumption.

Will the Asian short clawed otter be part of a future [EU-despite the Brexit] list of potentially invasive species European zoos will not be allowed to keep?
 
Will the Asian short clawed otter be part of a future [EU-despite the Brexit] list of potentially invasive species European zoos will not be allowed to keep?


It has not been assessed and it is not on the list of 95 species that are recommended to be addressed first, so unless the UK thinks it is a concern and does the risk assessment themselves to be proposed to the other member states I do not see it ending on the list.
 
I'm surprised to read that the reintroduction of Lutra lutra might help to decrease the local mink population. We have populations of both (as well as various other small mammalian predators) living along one another where I live, and so far I haven't heard anything from the local biologists that could confirm this assumption.

I've heard this suggestion on many occasions, as it happens - mostly this is from anecdotal accounts, but there has been at least one study which has come to this conclusion. I don't have the book with me at present as I am not at home, but the Natural History Society of Northumberland did a study on the mammals, reptiles and amphibians found within Northumberland, Tyne and Wear, and County Durham some years ago and published a book containing the results. Within, I seem to recall the suggestion that recovering populations of L. lutra are displacing and decreasing the introduced mink population was discussed and given some credence by the figures published. When I get home I shall post the relevant information into this thread.

On a more personal anecdotal level, I am told by older family members that the River Tees and River Skerne - both of which pass through Darlington - used to be particularly infested by American Mink in the 1980's and early 1990's. In the intervening time, both the European Otter *and* the Eurasian Water Vole have returned to these rivers, and the American Mink population is said to have fallen significantly. The return of the latter will certainly be due to the fall in mink populations; the question is whether the return of the former is the cause of the fall in mink populations. It is perhaps also pertinent to note that of the various mustelid species present as breeding wild populations in the United Kingdom I have still never seen an American Mink despite many years of looking for them throughout the north-east of England and the Scottish borders - yet have seen species which are allegedly harder to see such as Pine Marten, European Otter and European Badger with no difficulty.

(In a digression from this point, but something of a return to the original thread topic, the book also contains a list of exotic species recorded within the region - and notes the brief existence of a small Smooth-Coated Otter population in County Durham! Again, when I get home I will post the relevant information into this thread)
 
(In a digression from this point, but something of a return to the original thread topic, the book also contains a list of exotic species recorded within the region - and notes the brief existence of a small Smooth-Coated Otter population in County Durham! Again, when I get home I will post the relevant information into this thread)
this account notes a single escaped individual at Stanley in the 1960s:
Escaped Mammals – The Natural History Society of Northumbria
 
this account notes a single escaped individual at Stanley in the 1960s:
Escaped Mammals – The Natural History Society of Northumbria

That is actually the precise account I was thinking of - although my recollection had been (incorrectly) that a pair had been mentioned.

It seems the entire book I mentioned earlier has now been uploaded to the NHSN website, so I can now quote the relevant passage from the American Mink account:

A survey commissioned by the Environment Agency in 2006 of Water Vole in the region also looked for Mink signs (E3 Ecology and Durkin, 2006). Survey results suggested that the numbers of Mink signs from the 300 survey sites had reduced in 2006 compared to the numbers of signs found from the same sites during a national survey in 1989/1990 (Strachan and Jefferies, 1993); however statistical analysis of this data was not possible. The reduction of Mink signs could be as a result of increased Mink control or from an increase in Otter Lutra lutra presence in most of the catchments in the region. Mink are less adaptable to hunting in the water than Otters and so expend more energy in catching aquatic prey (Dunstone, 1993). Perhaps Otters are better at exploiting the aquatic environment compared to Mink and are possibly out-competing Mink in some areas? Perhaps Mink are exploiting terrestrial habitats more in areas where Otter presence has increased? Evidence to support these hypotheses would require further investigations.
 
Back
Top