washaw

Elephant Odyssey - Opening Day

  • Media owner washaw
  • Date added
It is finally open, today we got to see the $45 million Elephant Odyssey exhibit at the San Diego Zoo.
I am talking about just a few days after it opened.

As far as I can tell, the zoo promoted the exhibit for at least two months after opening. I'm not in Miami, so I'm not seeing the billboards, etc.

Anyway, you'll find Ron McGill interviewing on Amazon and Beyond now as much as he did last year.

So that's the one example?
 
Well, if you think about Amazon & Beyond was only advertised in Miami. On my news channel the other day they were showing a clip of Elephant Odyssey, and I live all the way in Florida thousands of miles from San Diego. Nowhere was Amazon & Beyond advertised.
 
Well, if you think about Amazon & Beyond was only advertised in Miami. On my news channel the other day they were showing a clip of Elephant Odyssey, and I live all the way in Florida thousands of miles from San Diego. Nowhere was Amazon & Beyond advertised.

Probably because San Diego is the self-titled world's best and therefore has to market itself to a larger number of people...
 
Probably because they have created a great elephant exhibit that is setting new standards for zoo elephant care.
 
Probably because they have created a great elephant exhibit that is setting new standards for zoo elephant care.

No way no how! The elephants may be well cared for the staff and all, but setting new standards? That is a bit over the top...
 
If San Diego cared so much about the welfare of its elephants, they would have done a NC and given them the whole 7 acre site, or whatever it was, and say "Hey, look at our elephants - the happiest in the world". But they didn't do that, that's for the wild animal park's job, they said "Hey, look at our elephants - they're in a re-created pleistocene environment". As such, they failed, yes, maybe the welfare is good (incidentally, we don't yet know) but the whole thing looks like a habitat for the desert elephants of namibia (and a bad one at that), not pleistocene california.
 
If San Diego cared so much about the welfare of its elephants, they would have done a NC and given them the whole 7 acre site, or whatever it was, and say "Hey, look at our elephants - the happiest in the world". But they didn't do that, that's for the wild animal park's job, they said "Hey, look at our elephants - they're in a re-created pleistocene environment". As such, they failed, yes, maybe the welfare is good (incidentally, we don't yet know) but the whole thing looks like a habitat for the desert elephants of namibia (and a bad one at that), not pleistocene california.

Are you saying that the WAP elephants are in a better exhibit for them than are the zoos elephants?

You can certainly argue that the zoo has too many species for how much land it has, but unless it cuts back on its species, it can't dedicate 7 acres to elephants. I also think they have plenty of space considering it's not an expanding herd.
 
Are you saying that the WAP elephants are in a better exhibit for them than are the zoos elephants?

You can certainly argue that the zoo has too many species for how much land it has, but unless it cuts back on its species, it can't dedicate 7 acres to elephants. I also think they have plenty of space considering it's not an expanding herd.

2.5 acres is a plenty large elephant habitat, and so far in this debate I find myself agreeing with you.
 

Media information

Category
San Diego Zoo
Added by
washaw
Date added
View count
9,027
Comment count
63
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Share this media

Back
Top