2030 nature targets agreed in December may already be slipping out of reach

UngulateNerd92

Well-Known Member
10+ year member
Premium Member
As recently as December 2022, 196 countries signed an agreement promising to “live in harmony with nature” by 2050 and to “halt and reverse biodiversity loss” by 2030.

Previous research has shown that coordinated action at the global scale is urgently needed to meet such goals. As conservationists, we’re also aware of a lag between when environmental changes like rising temperatures are observed by scientists and when organisms respond. We wanted to find out how this “ecological lag” might affect the world’s chances of stemming the loss of nature by the end of this decade.

Biodiversity – that is, the variability among living things, such as the number of species in a patch of forest – is declining globally, driven by humanity’s demand for resources. Habitat loss, harvesting, climate change, pollution and invasive species are the major driving forces behind this ecological reorganisation. For example, species found on mountains are moving upslope where it is cooler to counteract the effects of higher temperatures in their historical distribution.

2030 nature targets agreed in December may already be slipping out of reach
 
This same thing happened with the goal to double tiger populations by 2022 and we all know how well that worked. So I think it's safe to say these goals made by governments rarely will be met.

Then again, these are politicians were talking about here.
 
This same thing happened with the goal to double tiger populations by 2022 and we all know how well that worked. So I think it's safe to say these goals made by governments rarely will be met.

Then again, these are politicians were talking about here.

With the way our economic system is designed (globally), it seems like there are no incentives to meet these goals and that these goals might be mere lip service. I don't mean to sound cynical, but that is just my perception.
 
Back
Top