30×30: How Important Are Private Lands in Meeting Conservation Goals?

UngulateNerd92

Well-Known Member
10+ year member
Premium Member
Experts say expanding public lands won’t be enough to achieve science-based calls for more protected areas.

Sagebrush bulldozed for a housing development. A pipeline carved through grasslands. Forest felled for a road. Every 30 seconds in the United States, a football field-sized swath of nature is lost to development, according to research from the Center for American Progress.

This troubling trend runs counter to calls from scientists to protect more natural areas to mitigate against the effects of climate change and better protect plants and animals from extinction.

Current goals to protect biodiversity simply aren’t good enough, scientists say.

Targets set in the international Convention on Biological Diversity called for protecting 17% of land and 10% of the ocean by 2020. “These are interim measures that are politically driven but not science based and are widely viewed in the scientific literature as inadequate to avoid extinctions or halt the erosion of biodiversity,” according to research published in the journal Science Advances.

30x30: How Important Are Private Lands in Meeting Conservation Goals? • The Revelator
 
Back
Top