Sydney Zoo $36 million zoo with roaming African animals planned for Blacktown

As my next door countrymen will say: einfach Tee trinken.
Only: Seeing is Believing.
well, it will definitely open. I don't think there's really any doubt about that. Just what it will look like is the question. And what they will have on display when they do is anybody's guess.
 
For a mere 36mio AUD one cannot expect miracles.
Are they a member of ZAA (I expect not)?
How are they going about import/export regulations?
 
Pretty much.

It's not enough time and not enough money, and I still don't know how they imagine they're going to have all those big mammal species at opening.

Much still to be seen with this one I think.

Would really like to know where they are going to get the Hippos from??
 
I still wonder, as everyone has all through the thread, about how this zoo will look with only $36 million to build it.

I guess the zoo won't have any mock airplanes or fake Asian villages to distract visitors (and waste... uh, I mean spend money on).


The budget may be blown by the end of this exercise, but it seems very likely they'll forgo the embellishments and decorations of some of the larger zoos; fewer statues and unnecessary structures, less decoration, fewer interpretive structures and playgrounds (I'm guessing).

Also, I think it's a flatter site so would be easier and cheaper to build on.
 
I guess the zoo won't have any mock airplanes or fake Asian villages to distract visitors (and waste... uh, I mean spend money on).

How can they run a zoo with out the fake super markets old oil drums and wooden packing crates as well?
 
I really hope chimpanzees are on the agenda/still on the agenda. Taronga Zoo especially could do with the option of exporting some of their chimpanzees and the region as a whole would greatly benefit from the import of more females.
 
An interesting piece of this article from September relates to conditions placed by the state government upon the new zoo to restrict its impact on Featherdale's visitor numbers. The restrictions are for the first three years of operation, which seems like it will be little more than a stop-gap measure.

(The article is longer than the part I quote below).

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

Visitors to Sydney Zoo will not be allowed to touch a koala under strict conditions attached to its approval last week.

The state government’s planning and assessment commission added four conditions to its approval to prevent the zoo offering attractions of Doonside’s Featherdale Wildlife Park.

Featherdale owner, Elanor Investments Group, had opposed the zoo.

In addition to the koala rule (which applies for three years except for school programs), the zoo cannot have flying birds for the first three years so it does not include most of the birds at Featherdale.

The zoo must have at least two-thirds of its “exotic animals” in exhibits before opening to ensure it does not open as a native-only park. And so it does not offer the same native wildlife as Featherdale, it is required to have an aquarium, reptile house, insectarium and nocturnal house upon opening.

“Elanor is pleased that the commission has imposed additional consent conditions requiring the differentiation of the new zoo’s native offering from that of Featherdale and will ensure the continuity of the unique offering that Featherdale provides,” CEO Glenn Willis said.

He was pleased with the recognition of Featherdale’s “significant contribution to a range of educational, conservation and community engagement programs” over 43 years.
 
Re: Elephants: I wonder if they will partner up with Monarto and import a small founder herd of Africans. Interesting times ahead...
 
Taronga Zoo is suing over the name "Sydney Zoo":
Taronga Zoo, with its sweeping views of Sydney harbour from Mosman, is suing the operators of a planned second zoo in the city’s west over its proposed use of the name Sydney Zoo, claiming it is misleading and deceptive without the qualification it is in "western Sydney".

Plans for the $36 million cage-free Sydney Zoo in the Western Sydney Parklands at Bungarribee in Blacktown were revealed in 2015 and the venture received final planning approval in September last year.

The not-for-profit Taronga Zoo has launched a Federal Court bid to stop the proponents using the name Sydney Zoo on the grounds it is likely to mislead the public, including international and interstate tourists, into thinking the western Sydney attraction is the "long-established and well-known" Taronga Zoo and is "located in central Sydney".

It said Sydney Zoo, which will be located "over 33 kilometres from the centre of Sydney", chose its name "with the knowledge and intention that the geographic indicator of Sydney would increase the appeal" of its zoo to visitors, particularly tourists.

Taronga Zoo is located about 8 kilometres from the CBD and said the use of the term "Sydney zoo" by its rival amounted to a false or misleading representation that it was located in "central Sydney rather than western Sydney".
 
Back
Top