Over the last couple of years, I've been able to look at some zoos I have visited before in a bit of a different light, owing to the fact that I now try to keep full species lists for most zoos I visit. During this time, some of the zoos I've been able to visit that I am now looking at a little differently are the zoos of Chicago and the Twin Cities (for those who don't know that's Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota).
I, as others have before me, made some obvious observations comparing the zoos of these two cities. Both have a smaller, more popular zoo in the center of the city which receives lots of funding and has had multiple new exhibits in recent years. Each city also has a much larger (but less popular) zoo in the suburbs outside the city that hasn't had a new exhibit in years due to a lack of funding. Each city also has a major aquarium.
In Chicago, this is Lincoln Park Zoo, Brookfield Zoo, and Shedd Aquarium. In the Twin Cities, this is Como Park Zoo, Minnesota Zoo, and Sea Life Minnesota.
One thing that became apparent when I was getting species lists for these facilities was that it seemed like these sets of zoos had opposite approaches to "overlap species" - what I'm calling a species kept in more than one zoo in the city. In the Twin Cities, it seemed that none of the zoos really have any overlap in species at all. In contrast, I felt like in Chicago I just kept seeing the same species over and over again. How true is this? Did it just appear that way in my mind, or is there really something going on here? Let's take a closer look at my species lists and find out.
I, as others have before me, made some obvious observations comparing the zoos of these two cities. Both have a smaller, more popular zoo in the center of the city which receives lots of funding and has had multiple new exhibits in recent years. Each city also has a much larger (but less popular) zoo in the suburbs outside the city that hasn't had a new exhibit in years due to a lack of funding. Each city also has a major aquarium.
In Chicago, this is Lincoln Park Zoo, Brookfield Zoo, and Shedd Aquarium. In the Twin Cities, this is Como Park Zoo, Minnesota Zoo, and Sea Life Minnesota.
One thing that became apparent when I was getting species lists for these facilities was that it seemed like these sets of zoos had opposite approaches to "overlap species" - what I'm calling a species kept in more than one zoo in the city. In the Twin Cities, it seemed that none of the zoos really have any overlap in species at all. In contrast, I felt like in Chicago I just kept seeing the same species over and over again. How true is this? Did it just appear that way in my mind, or is there really something going on here? Let's take a closer look at my species lists and find out.