Aardwolf
Well-Known Member
Thank you @Strathmorezoo - I'm no longer working with callitrichids, but I appreciate the offer, and enjoy hearing about your experiences with the species!
Of the four species of flamingos present in North American zoos, I’ve worked with the two most common species – Chileans at one non-AZA zoo, Americans at one-AZA zoo.
This was one situation in which I thought that the non-AZA facility had an advantage over the AZA, in that their birds were kept in a walk-through aviary (albeit not a very big one), whereas the AZA birds were in an open-topped exhibit. Not that it mattered in terms of flight – birds in both set ups were flight-restricted – but having birds in an aviary meant that they could be left outside 24/7 during warmer weather (and if you’re a Chilean flamingo, your definition of “warmer weather” can be pretty broad), whereas the flamingos in the open-top exhibit had to be brought in at night for predator protection. Like the aforementioned macaws, I would often stay late working on other projects so I could leave the flamingos out for longer in the summer. This, of course, resulted in several occasions in which I forgot the birds, went home, and then jumped out of bed later that night when I remembered them, and ran back to the zoo to put them up. Thankfully we never had any problems with predators.
Flamingo diets at both facilities consisted of a dry pellet chow (different brands at the different zoos) served in pans of water. These were among the few animals for which I never offered any dietary variation – no enrichment food items or anything. The chow could be tossed into their exhibit pool, but I often preferred to have it in separate bowls to reduce the contamination of the main pool. If I was building a flamingo exhibit from scratch, I’d probably have an entirely separate, smaller pool for feeding, nearby by separate from the main pool.
Flamingos are paradoxical birds to work with. On one hand, they’re overall very hardy, tough birds (especially the two species I’ve worked with, as well as greaters – less so the lesser), capable of withstanding many weather conditions and generally being in good health. On the other hand, they’re so clumsy and seemingly fragile that every day I was amazed that they didn’t all crash into a fence into a mangled, tangled heap. They also have a greater extent of neophobia (fear of new things) than almost any animal I’ve encountered. I’d frequently be walking the flamingos in for the night, then they’d all turn and balk, running back to the exhibit. After this would happen, I’d go back to the building and try to figure out what it was – a hose coiled too loosely? A shovel or rake left leaning against a wall? - that had spooked them. It would have to be corrected before the birds would go back in. Management of birds was relatively hands-off – occasional catch-ups for wing trims, injections, etc. Much like sloths, flamingos are pretty harmless, but there’s still something oddly unsettling about having one snap at you.
The most persistent health challenge for flamingos is their feet – they are very susceptible to bumblefoot, the infection of the foot pads that impacts of so many zoo birds. In their wild state, they spend much of their time on soft substrates (whereas many zoo ponds are, by nature, artificial and concrete-bottomed), and many zoos do a lot of experimenting with mats to see what type is the best for their feet. Once, in an eccentric mood, I decided to service and clean our flamingo exhibit and holding building barefooted, so I could feel what the different substrates felt like myself and identify things we might want to improve. To this day, colleagues gag when I tell them that I did that. Flamingos are… not clean, even by avian standards. That being said, their poop and leftover/spilled food all tends to be very wet, so it does clean very easily.
The flock of American flamingos at the AZA zoo was a bachelor flock, so obviously no breeding there, but the owner of the zoo where the Chileans were was determined to breed them. I sometimes think he was too determined – and above all, too impatient. He’d try a set-up for a year, then decide it wasn’t working and change things up, sometimes switching the enclosure entirely. I think that it would have been best to let the birds settle, get comfortable, and build on past successes rather than yo-yoing around so much. Comfortable birds breed better, especially when they feel safe and secure – why make yourself vulnerable sitting on a nest, investing in biologically expensive eggs, if you feel it’s likely that everything is going to get torn up in an instant? The one thing he wouldn’t try was allowing me to close the aviary to the public – it was a decent size, but the visitor walkway went right down the middle, so there weren’t many places that the birds could get much distance from the public (in a puckish mood, I was considered bringing in some hard-boiled eggs and leaving them in the exhibit overnight to see if I could trick him into thinking they laid, but decided against it. The man had no sense of humor). Ironically, our all-male flock of Americans at the AZA zoo did frequently build nests. We probably couldn’t have managed breeding there, however, what with birds being driven inside every night.
Social grouping is perhaps the key component of flamingo welfare in zoos, and at either zoo I felt like we could have doubled our flock size in the available space, and the birds would have been just as happy. It’s also the key factor for determining reproductive success in flamingo exhibits. It’s for this reason that I think flamingos – along with other colonial birds, such as penguins and puffins – make the best exhibits of any birds. There is always so much bustle and activity, so many chances to observe natural behavior, with social interactions being the best enrichment (with the exception of reproduction/rearing offspring). That, combined with how instantly recognizable they are to the public, help explains why they’re the classic entry-exhibit at so many zoos. You never have to wonder if the flamingos will be out on exhibit, or whether visitors will see them doing anything – ironically, the two most common flamingo species in zoos are more cold-tolerant than the most popularly kept penguin species, which means that there are some days when a zoo visitor may see flamingos out in winter, but the penguins are kept locked inside!
Of the four species of flamingos present in North American zoos, I’ve worked with the two most common species – Chileans at one non-AZA zoo, Americans at one-AZA zoo.
This was one situation in which I thought that the non-AZA facility had an advantage over the AZA, in that their birds were kept in a walk-through aviary (albeit not a very big one), whereas the AZA birds were in an open-topped exhibit. Not that it mattered in terms of flight – birds in both set ups were flight-restricted – but having birds in an aviary meant that they could be left outside 24/7 during warmer weather (and if you’re a Chilean flamingo, your definition of “warmer weather” can be pretty broad), whereas the flamingos in the open-top exhibit had to be brought in at night for predator protection. Like the aforementioned macaws, I would often stay late working on other projects so I could leave the flamingos out for longer in the summer. This, of course, resulted in several occasions in which I forgot the birds, went home, and then jumped out of bed later that night when I remembered them, and ran back to the zoo to put them up. Thankfully we never had any problems with predators.
Flamingo diets at both facilities consisted of a dry pellet chow (different brands at the different zoos) served in pans of water. These were among the few animals for which I never offered any dietary variation – no enrichment food items or anything. The chow could be tossed into their exhibit pool, but I often preferred to have it in separate bowls to reduce the contamination of the main pool. If I was building a flamingo exhibit from scratch, I’d probably have an entirely separate, smaller pool for feeding, nearby by separate from the main pool.
Flamingos are paradoxical birds to work with. On one hand, they’re overall very hardy, tough birds (especially the two species I’ve worked with, as well as greaters – less so the lesser), capable of withstanding many weather conditions and generally being in good health. On the other hand, they’re so clumsy and seemingly fragile that every day I was amazed that they didn’t all crash into a fence into a mangled, tangled heap. They also have a greater extent of neophobia (fear of new things) than almost any animal I’ve encountered. I’d frequently be walking the flamingos in for the night, then they’d all turn and balk, running back to the exhibit. After this would happen, I’d go back to the building and try to figure out what it was – a hose coiled too loosely? A shovel or rake left leaning against a wall? - that had spooked them. It would have to be corrected before the birds would go back in. Management of birds was relatively hands-off – occasional catch-ups for wing trims, injections, etc. Much like sloths, flamingos are pretty harmless, but there’s still something oddly unsettling about having one snap at you.
The most persistent health challenge for flamingos is their feet – they are very susceptible to bumblefoot, the infection of the foot pads that impacts of so many zoo birds. In their wild state, they spend much of their time on soft substrates (whereas many zoo ponds are, by nature, artificial and concrete-bottomed), and many zoos do a lot of experimenting with mats to see what type is the best for their feet. Once, in an eccentric mood, I decided to service and clean our flamingo exhibit and holding building barefooted, so I could feel what the different substrates felt like myself and identify things we might want to improve. To this day, colleagues gag when I tell them that I did that. Flamingos are… not clean, even by avian standards. That being said, their poop and leftover/spilled food all tends to be very wet, so it does clean very easily.
The flock of American flamingos at the AZA zoo was a bachelor flock, so obviously no breeding there, but the owner of the zoo where the Chileans were was determined to breed them. I sometimes think he was too determined – and above all, too impatient. He’d try a set-up for a year, then decide it wasn’t working and change things up, sometimes switching the enclosure entirely. I think that it would have been best to let the birds settle, get comfortable, and build on past successes rather than yo-yoing around so much. Comfortable birds breed better, especially when they feel safe and secure – why make yourself vulnerable sitting on a nest, investing in biologically expensive eggs, if you feel it’s likely that everything is going to get torn up in an instant? The one thing he wouldn’t try was allowing me to close the aviary to the public – it was a decent size, but the visitor walkway went right down the middle, so there weren’t many places that the birds could get much distance from the public (in a puckish mood, I was considered bringing in some hard-boiled eggs and leaving them in the exhibit overnight to see if I could trick him into thinking they laid, but decided against it. The man had no sense of humor). Ironically, our all-male flock of Americans at the AZA zoo did frequently build nests. We probably couldn’t have managed breeding there, however, what with birds being driven inside every night.
Social grouping is perhaps the key component of flamingo welfare in zoos, and at either zoo I felt like we could have doubled our flock size in the available space, and the birds would have been just as happy. It’s also the key factor for determining reproductive success in flamingo exhibits. It’s for this reason that I think flamingos – along with other colonial birds, such as penguins and puffins – make the best exhibits of any birds. There is always so much bustle and activity, so many chances to observe natural behavior, with social interactions being the best enrichment (with the exception of reproduction/rearing offspring). That, combined with how instantly recognizable they are to the public, help explains why they’re the classic entry-exhibit at so many zoos. You never have to wonder if the flamingos will be out on exhibit, or whether visitors will see them doing anything – ironically, the two most common flamingo species in zoos are more cold-tolerant than the most popularly kept penguin species, which means that there are some days when a zoo visitor may see flamingos out in winter, but the penguins are kept locked inside!

















