African Record

Hix

Wildlife Enthusiast and Lover of Islands
15+ year member
Premium Member
The following is an extract from a book titled The Beauties of Nature and Art Displayed in a Tour Through the World and published in 1774. The extract is titled African Record and the author is unidentified.

I post it here as I think some people may find it interesting reading.

The spelling is reproduced as written.

:p

Hix


“Negroland and Guinea abound with elephants, lions, and many other wild beafts already defcribed. The river-horfe, crocodile, and alligator, are frequent in the river Gambia, together with a fifh refembling a fmall alligator, called Guana, which is eaten by the inhabitants bordering upon the river, and is efteemed a delicious fifh.

In thefe parts of Africa, as in moft hot fandy countries, there are a great many fnakes and other venomous reptiles. Mr.Moore tells us, that the natives are much afraid of the black fnakes, which he himfelf has feen three yards long, and as big as the fmall of his leg. He was alfo told of feveral other venomous fnakes, particularly fome with a comb upon their heads, which they pofitively affirm to crow like a cock. This perhaps is what we call a bafilifk, or cockatrice, concerning which many ftrange things have been reported, that are now generally looked upon as fabulous. There are likewife fnakes with two heads growing out of one neck; but thofe our author fays he never faw. He fhot a green fnake about two yards long, but in the thickeft part not above three inches in circumference. This kind of fnake, he was informed by the natives, is not at all venomous; but they have fo many that are fo, that they feldom go without a remedy about them, in café they fhould be hit by any of thefe poifonous animals.

At a town about a mile from Brucoe, Mr. Moore found a very large fcorpion, being full twelve inches long. Thefe creatures are reckoned very venomous; and were a perfon to be ftung by fo large a one as this, our author believes it would be immediate death. He has known feveral people ftung by fmall fcorpions, which wound is fo extremely painful, that for at leaft twelve hours the perfon ftung cannot fleep; but about that time the pain abates, and foon after is quite over. It is remarkable, that notwithftanding the violence of the pain, the fwelling is very little.

Guinea hens and partridges abound in thefe countries; and it is obfervable, that the latter have often two large fpurs upon each leg. There are likewife plenty of wild geefe and ducks, the former of which are larger than ours, and have long fpurs growing out of the middle joint of the wings, with which they will beat a dog. The ducks are nearly as large as the geefe, and the feathers of both are black and white.

About Joar a remarkable bird is found, about the fize of a pigeon, having four wings. It never flies but in the evening, and may therefore be properly ranked among the bat kind. Another extraordinary bird, called Gabbon by the Mundingoes, and Gofsreal by the Portuguefe, is very frequent there. They meafure upwards of fix feet from the toes to the extremity of the breaft, and are efteemed delicious eating.

The mufquetoes, fays our author, are the greateft plague to a perfon of any vermin on the river. They are even worfe than fome fmall flies, and from their minutnefs called fand-flies, which are fo little as hardly to be difcerned. Thefe, if any wind be ftirring, are not able to bite; but the mufquetoes mind neither wind nor anything elfe, giving a perfon continual difturbance, efpecially in the night-time. They may be compared to our Englifh gnats, but are much more troublefome; when they bite, the part itches very much; and if you fcratch it till it bleeds, you run the rifk of having a fore; and when it is healed, the place always appears of a blackfifh colour.

The buggabuggs, as the natives call them, are a pernicious and deftructive vermin where-ever they get an entrance. There way of travelling is to make a hollow pipe or tube of dirt, much like an arch of a vault, under which they march without being feen. They are a fort of white ants, and are very expeditious at their work; for in twelve hours they will make their tube, and travel eight or nine yards to get to a cheft, box, or barrell. Wherever they get, they make ftrange havoc, efpecially in woollen cloathes. In fhort, nothing comes amifs to them, for they feed as hartily upon wood as anything elfe; and what is moft remarkable, fays our author, is, that they eat the infide only of a cheft or table, fo that when they have entirely deftroyed it by eating the very heart and fubftance of the wood, it appears to the eye to be ftill found. They cannot bear the fun, which feems to kill them for a time, but after fun-fet they are obferved to recover their ftrength and vigour. People are obliged to watch thefe creatures very carefully, and to take meafures to prevent their coming to their chefts, which is done by putting them on ftands with the legs of them well daubed with tar; and if the tar be not fpread over anew at leaft once a week, it is ten to one but thefe infects pay them a vifit.”
 
The following is an extract from a book titled The Beauties of Nature and Art Displayed in a Tour Through the World and published in 1774. The extract is titled African Record and the author is unidentified.

I post it here as I think some people may find it interesting reading.

The spelling is reproduced as written.

:p

Hix

The letter 's' wafn't invented back then? :D

It reminds me of when we were learning C++ (a programming language). Some of the commands ended with an 'f' (like printf and scanf), and some classmates and I went through a phase of sending emails to each other with every word ending in 'f'. :D :D "Hellof Nanoboyf... etc"
 
That is pretty interesting. With it being nearly 240 years old, just getting to places like Africa would have been an really epic journey in itself. The spelling is a bit awkward though, I wonder why 'f' was used instead of 's' so frequently?. I can imagine that reading this aloud would require more saliva than your average few paragraphs.
 
Does anybody have any idea what the pigeon-sized, 4-winged species he is referring to here is? Or the large 5 footed bird called "gabbon" or "gofsreal"?

"About Joar a remarkable bird is found, about the fize of a pigeon, having four wings. It never flies but in the evening, and may therefore be properly ranked among the bat kind. Another extraordinary bird, called Gabbon by the Mundingoes, and Gofsreal by the Portuguefe, is very frequent there. They meafure upwards of fix feet from the toes to the extremity of the breaft, and are efteemed delicious eating."
 
The spelling isn't using the letter f, it is a long s. It resembles an f when written but is pronounced as s. It is a distinction that no longer exists in written English.

The four-winged bird is a standard-winged nightjar.

The text doesn't say the "gabbon" has five feet, it says it measures five feet in length/height. I don't know what it was but a bustard seems likely, or maybe a crane if it is referring to height.
 
Last edited:
Actually, its six feet, and I would have thought it was an ostrich. Can't think of anything else that close to that tall. I'm assuming the reporter was exaggerating somewhat.

And Chlidonias is correct about the long s/f thing. When written it looks like a cursive f (or one in a fancy font).

I've seen an old picture from the 1800's of an Australian Owlet-Nightjar, labeled with the old name of Australian Goatsucker.

:p

Hix
 
Actually, its six feet, and I would have thought it was an ostrich. Can't think of anything else that close to that tall. I'm assuming the reporter was exaggerating somewhat.
oops, it was indeed six feet!! That's what you get for putting an f in front of it :p

I guess it must be an ostrich then.
 
I've been having a quick browse through The Beauties of Nature and Art Displayed in a Tour Through the World and I have to say that this really is a remarkable book, thirteen volumes in all covering pretty much the entire world and dealing in zoology, geology, botany, culture, etc etc. And written in 1774-5!! I really wouldn't mind owning this myself.

As was the fashion of the time, there is a very lengthy subtitle:

"The Beauties of Nature and Art Displayed in a Tour Through the World; Containing
I. A General Account of all the Countries in the World, remarkable for either their Natural or Artificial Curiosities; their Situations, Boundaries, Extent and Divisions; their Rivers, Air, Soil, chief Cities &c.
II A particular Account of the most curious natural Productions of each Country, in the Animal, Vegetable and Fossil Kingdoms; of remarkable Mountains, Caverns, and Volcano's; of Medicinal and other singular Springs; of Cataracts, Whirlpools, &c.
III. An Historical Account of the most remarkable Earthquakes, Inundations, Fires, Epidemic Diseases and other public Calamities, which have, at different Times, visited the Inhabitants.
IV. Extraordinary Instances of Longevity, Fertility, &c among the Inhabitants; together with an Account of their most celebrated Inventions, Discoveries, &c.
V. Particular Descriptions of the most remarkable public Buildings, and other singular Productions of Art.
VI. Curious Remains of Antiquity; remarkable Laws, Customs and Traditions of the Inhabitants; together with a Summary View of the most extraordinary Revolutions among them."
 
I imagine it would be a bugger to read with all those f ' s !

:p

Hix
 
If I am in a good mood, I will let a select group of you flip through my original copy of Birds of America that I bought at auction in 2010. :D You don't have to worry about ye olde English: just enjoy the illustrations.
 
I think the description of the imperial scorpion is pretty clear - except that it is not particularly venomous, although it looks as if it ought to be. Likewise the spur-winged goose is pretty recognisable.

Alan
 
I imagine it would be a bugger to read with all those f ' s !

:p

Hix
I don't find it a problem, except for a few instances where the word is very short and can look roughly similar to another word (e.g. fix and five). Otherwise your brain should be able to automatically recognise the word based on the overall arrangement of letters. Although apparently Australian python forumers can't manage this, am I right? :D
 
I don't find it a problem, except for a few instances where the word is very short and can look roughly similar to another word (e.g. fix and five). Otherwise your brain should be able to automatically recognise the word based on the overall arrangement of letters. Although apparently Australian python forumers can't manage this, am I right? :D

Sounds like bullfhit to me. :D
 
Although apparently Australian python forumers can't manage this, am I right? :D

Probably not. I haven't been there for a while and it appears the two languages widely spoken were jibberish and txt.

And probably bullfhit, too. :)

:p

Hix
 
Back
Top