So why are the restrictions being considered?
Hopefully the agriculture companies will take notice and lobby to change this.I wonder if this will hurt the pet trade and agriculture industries as well.
Taking that into consideration, how likely do you think it is that they'll back down from those new policies?I think the decisions made by the airlines mostly has to do with recent bad press about pets being lost or killed on flights. The airlines then make blanket policy decisions that then affect the zoo and conservation industry unintentionally.
Not very because like it’s been said before, zoos do not make up a significant portion of their business even before the new policies. It will take an effort from multiple industries (agriculture, pet, etc.) and potentially the government to make any changes.Taking that into consideration, how likely do you think it is that they'll back down from those new policies?
The article did say they may have to take this to Washington, maybe taking advantage of the annual zoo meeting on Capitol Hill for this.Not very because like it’s been said before, zoos do not make up a significant portion of their business even before the new policies. It will take an effort from multiple industries (agriculture, pet, etc.) and potentially the government to make any changes.
I think it's more to do with all the issues they had recently over 'assistance animals'. People were trying to have their pets with them on flights by passing them off as support animals when they were nothing of the sort, as a result I believe the two airlines in question decided to prohibit any animals being brought on board. I'm sure I read somewhere about a woman flushing her hamster down the toilet after being told it could not be brought on board as an assistance animal and she didn't want to miss her flight because of it.