Don't forget the gorgeous fish/reptile paludarium. I think I may have enjoyed that singular display more than the bear exhibit (not that I didn't enjoy the bear enclosure). This section was probably the best part of my visit there.The planned acquisition of viscacha fell through, so although the rest of the species list isn’t the most exciting, the guinea pig mini-village is endearing and the cotton-top tamarin display in the women’s restroom is particularly unique to say the least.
Don’t forget the 1941 African Plains—the first application of Hagenbeck’s panorama concept in the US—still pretty outstanding 82 years later.
And none of those Hagenbeck-inspired (or even Hagenbeck-designed) exhibits incorporated the iconic predator/prey illusions of the Hamburg original, while the lion/nyala setup at the Bronx pulls it off brilliantly. Milwaukee’s late 50’s version of the concept was lessened by formulaic repetition and distractingly abstract and visually-overpowering rockwork.Yep. A lot of those exhibits aged out and got repurposed in places like Detroit, Columbus, and Cincinnati (to a lesser extent). Bronx's really stands the test of time.
And none of those Hagenbeck-inspired (or even Hagenbeck-designed) exhibits incorporated the iconic predator/prey illusions of the Hamburg original, while the lion/nyala setup at the Bronx pulls it off brilliantly. Milwaukee’s late 50’s version of the concept was lessened by formulaic repetition and distractingly abstract and visually-overpowering rockwork.
Columbus did it again (much more successfully) with Heart of Africa.Bronx is the only one I've seen in which I had to concentrate to see that the animals were separated. Columbus tried the predator/prey concept and it was less than impressive. Cincinnati kind of half tries it in the new Africa complex with lions and the main yard, but again, it's pretty obvious.
2. Expedition Peru: Trek of the Andean Bear
Nashville Zoo, TN
Opened: 2018
Size: 1.5 Acres (0.6 Hectares)
Inhabitants: Andean Bear, Southern Pudu, Cotton-top Tamarin, Guinea Pig and a variety of South American ectotherms.
There is no shortage of fantastic Andean bear habitats in Europe, but in America tropical bears in general have often gotten the shaft in favor of the much more readily available North American bears. Without much competition, this exhibit is the absolute best of its kind for Andean bears in the United States by a relatively wide margin. The bear habitat is beautifully landscaped and features several cascading waterfalls alongside tastefully done rockwork. A large 15 foot tall artificial tree trunk is the centerpiece that provides impressive climbing opportunities. The exhibit is viewed through both dry moats and large windows inside of a spacious lodge that includes underwater viewing. That building is part of a small Peruvian village recreation that’s complemented by various satellite habitats to help round out the area. The planned acquisition of viscacha fell through, so although the rest of the species list isn’t the most exciting, the guinea pig mini-village is endearing and the cotton-top tamarin display in the women’s restroom is particularly unique to say the least.
![]()
@Moebelle
![]()
@Moebelle
![]()
@geomorph
![]()
@geomorph
![]()
@geomorph
![]()
@Zooplantman
Similar Exhibits: None
Well keep in mind there's a difference between being a "must see" exhibit and being one of the best exhibits in the country. I'm sure there is a number of attractions (this being one of them), that wouldn't be included in a list of the best zoo exhibits in the country, but are included because they achieve something unique that nowhere else is able to. After the first exhibit of the thread, I created my own list of 99 Zoo exhibits that I'm guessing would be included (so far I'm two for two for correct guesses), and I certainly included a few exhibits that I (and most people) would not include in a list of best exhibits, but due to their uniqueness or their historical value, do warrant inclusion as a must-see exhibit. This was a point of debate in last year's 50 exhibits thread also, especially surrounding Central Park Zoo, as some zoos made the list for reasons other than being the "best".This inclusion may start a debate…
I'd very curious to see how your list compares to mine, so if you'd like you can send it to me and I'll let you know how accurate it is (unless you don't want me to tell you). This goes for anyone else as well, as it really is fun to see others opinions.After the first exhibit of the thread, I created my own list of 99 Zoo exhibits that I'm guessing would be included (so far I'm two for two for correct guesses), and I certainly included a few exhibits that I (and most people) would not include in a list of best exhibits, but due to their uniqueness or their historical value, do warrant inclusion as a must-see exhibit
To be fair, the real pioneer was the Antwerp Zoo which started this concept in 1948, though, as is more often the case, the Americans supersized it. The system was abandoned in Antwerp recently, but this is how it looked there:
![]()
@Skukuza
Execution wise the Bronx example is much more impressive and I like the use of concrete![]()
Well, let’s talk about the cetaceans part. I’ll skirt around the ethical question because you did and not doing so could derail the thread. Fun fact: they used to have false killer whales in there (with the dolphins, I think, but before my time).
Agreed. Animal welfare comes before human entertainment. An exhibit with poor animal welfare cannot be considered a great or must see exhibit.I'll come out and say it. We all know what has happened with dolphin deaths at the Indianapolis Zoo. Over three dozen dolphins have died in this exhibit. Can any exhibit with this kill record be considered a great exhibit, no matter how spectacular it is from a human visitor perspective? It's an important question if we are being honest about the animal welfare dimension of an exhibit.
I don't know what I'm missing here, but I've read through this several times and I still can't see why it is "must see" - especially when you have followed it up after the photos by saying "Similar Exhibits: There are countless African savanna complexes across the continent, far too many to name here and several that will appear on the list later on."4. Heart of Africa
Columbus Zoo, OH
Opened: 2014
Size: 43 Acres (17.5 Hectares)
Inhabitants: Masai Giraffe, Grant’s Zebra, African Lion, Cheetah, Vervet Monkey, Dromedary Camel, Ostrich, various antelope and more.
American zoos are stereotyped for their love of thematic man-made creations in their exhibits. Although that’s a fairly broad generalization, it’s exhibits like these that prove that’s not entirely inaccurate either. The real challenge is if you can integrate the thematics without a negative impact on animal welfare, which this complex has done an excellent job of. A crashed jet plane through the window of the lion exhibit or a patio barbecue overrun by a group of vervets may not be everyone's cup of tea, but they do create memorable vistas for guests and enrichment for the animals. The beautiful multi-acre savanna avoids this style entirely and the rolling hills make it appear as if the exhibit goes on forever, obscuring the adjacent suburban neighborhood. It essentially serves as a continuous backdrop to the other enclosures which limits up-close viewing opportunities, but flows effortlessly with the lion habitat and a smaller giraffe yard in the foreground. The waterhole habitat is a jack-of-all-trades display rotating through dozens of different species. Depending on the time you come by, you can find everything from warthogs to aardvarks to hyenas. For the amount of space the zoo had to work with, it does make one wish more species were present and it’s a shame further plans for hippos, rhinos, baboons and other species never materialized. Either way, what has been realized is fantastic and proves that theming can be done right, even when it’s a tad over the top.